Advertisement

Procedural Model for the Virtual Commissioning on the Basis of Model-Based Design

  • Tanja SchmüdderrichEmail author
  • Ansgar Trächtler
  • Jan Brökelmann
  • Jürgen Gausemeier
Part of the Lecture Notes in Production Engineering book series (LNPE)

Abstract

There are many methods for the development of new products. One of them is model-based design. This article is dedicated to the usage of this design method for the reduction of the time required for the commissioning of manufacturing plants. For this purpose, the method of virtual commissioning is combined with the model-based design which makes it possible to create a procedural model. The presented approach assists the developer in order to save time during the actual commissioning and thus reduce costs. The presented approach is validated on an application example.

Keywords

virtual commissioning production system development modelbased design systems engineering 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Verein Deutscher Ingenieure: Design methodology for mechatronic systems. Beuth Verlag, Berlin ICS 03.100.40; 31.220(VDI 2206) (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ostersötebier, F., Just, V., Trächtler, A., Bauer, F., Dziwok, S.: Model-Based Design of Mechatronic Systems by means of Semantic Web Ontologies and Reusable Solution Elements. In: ASME (ed.) ASME 2012 11th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis (ESDA 2012), Nantes, France, July 2-4 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barth, M.: Automatisch generierte Simulationsmodelle verfahrenstechnischer Anlagen für den Steuerungstest. VDI-Verl., Düsseldorf (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wünsch, G.: Methoden für die virtuelle Inbetriebnahme automatisierter Produktionssysteme. Forschungsberichte IWB, vol. 215. Herbert Utz Verlag GmbH, München (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zäh, M., Wünsch, G., Hensel, T., Lindworsky, A.: Feldstudie - Virtuelle Inbetriebnahme. wt Werkstattstechnik Online 96(10) (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoffmann, P., Schumann, R., Maksoud, T.M.A., Premier, G.C.: Virtual commissioning of manufacturing systems a review and new approaches for simplification. In: Proceedings - 24th European Conference on Modelling and Simulation, ECMS 2010, pp. 175–181 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gausemeier, J., Schäfer, W., Anacker, H., Bauer, F., Dziwok, S.: Einsatz semantischer Technologien im Entwurf mechatronischer Systeme. In: Gausemeier, J., Rammig, F., Schäfer, W., Trächtler, A. (eds.) Wissenschaftsforum 2011. Intelligente Technische Systeme. 8. Paderborner Workshop Entwurf Mechatronischer Systeme, May 19-20. HNI Verlagschriftenreihe, Paderborn (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pahl, G., Wallace, K., Blessing, L.: Engineering design: A systematic approach, 3rd edn. Springer, London (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kufner, A.: Automatisierte Erstellung von Maschinenmodellen für die Hardware-in-the-Loop-Simulation von Montagemaschinen. Jost-Jetter, Heimsheim (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lochbiechler, M., Schmüdderrich, T., Brökelmann, J., Trächtler, A.: Methodology for Selecting the Modeling Depth of Object-Oriented Behavioral Models. In: WASET (ed.) Engineering and Technology, Zurich (July 2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tanja Schmüdderrich
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ansgar Trächtler
    • 1
  • Jan Brökelmann
    • 2
  • Jürgen Gausemeier
    • 2
  1. 1.Heinz Nixdorf Institute, Control Engineering and MechatronicsUniversity of PaderbornPaderbornGermany
  2. 2.Heinz Nixdorf Institute, Product EngineeringUniversity of PaderbornPaderbornGermany

Personalised recommendations