Advertisement

Approach for an Early Validation of Mechatronic Systems Using Idealized Simulation Models within the Conceptual Design

  • Frank BauerEmail author
  • Jürgen Gausemeier
  • Daniel Köchling
  • Felix Oestersötebier
Part of the Lecture Notes in Production Engineering book series (LNPE)

Abstract

The success of mechatronic systems is determined by the close interaction of mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, control engineering and software engineering. During the design processes developers often rely on established and proven solutions. In order to ensure the desired system behavior simulations are carried out. This leads to considerable modeling effort to create the necessary simulation model. In this paper an approach for early validation of mechatronic systems is presented. The aim is to reduce the modeling effort for simulation models and to allow early simulations of different concepts. Therefore idealized simulation models are combined to a simulation-ready Modelica model of the system. The model is generated (semi-)automatically based on information provided by the active structure, a shape model and a behavior model. All models are part of a coherent system that describes the principle solution. Adjustments and changes in the simulation model are transferred back into the partial model.

Keywords

Mechatronics Conceptual Design Model-Based System Design Principle Solution Dynamic Analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Döbler, T.: Simulation und Visualisierung in der Produktentwicklung. FAZIT-Schriftenreihe Band 12. MFG Stiftung Baden-Württemberg, Stuttgart (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Votintseva, A., Witschel, P., Regnat, N., Stelzig, P.E.: Comparative Study of Model-Based and Multi-Domain System Engineering Approaches for Industrial Settings. In: Vallecillo, A., Tolvanen, J.-P., Kindler, E., Störrle, H., Kolovos, D. (eds.) ECMFA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7349, pp. 20–31. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    The Association of German Engineers (VDI): Design methodology for mechatronic systems. VDI-Guideline 2206. Beuth-Verlag, Berlin (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., Grote, K.-H.: Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gausemeier, J., Lanza, G., Lindemann, U. (Hrsg.): Produkte und Produktionssysteme integrativ konzipieren – Modellbildung und Analyse in der frühen Phase der Produktentstehung. Carl Hanser Verlag, München (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anacker, H., Bauer, F., Dumitrescu, R., Gausemeier, J.: Computer support for the identification of solution patterns for the conceptual design of advanced mechatronic systems. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis (ESDA 2012), Nantes (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    IEC 61131-3: Programmable controllers – Part 3: Programming. Beuth Verlag, Berlin (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oestersötebier, F., Just, V., Trächtler, A., Bauer, F., Dziwok, S.: Model-Based Design of Mechatronic Systems by means of Semantic Web Ontologies and Reusable Solution Elements. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis (ESDA 2012), Nantes (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Modelica Association: Modelica® A Unified Object-Oriented Language for Physical Systems Modeling – Language Specification – Version 3.1, Linköping, Sweden (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paredis, C.J.J., Diaz-Calderon, A., Sinha, R., Khosla, P.K.: Composable Models for Simulation-Based Design. In: Engineering with Computers. Springer, London (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee, E.A., Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A.: Component-Based Design for the Future. In: Proceedings of the Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), Grenoble (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dynasim, A.B.: Dynamic Modeling Laboratory – Manual. Ideon Sciene Park, Lund (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank Bauer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jürgen Gausemeier
    • 1
  • Daniel Köchling
    • 1
  • Felix Oestersötebier
    • 2
  1. 1.Chair of Product EngineeringUniversity of PaderbornPaderbornGermany
  2. 2.Chair of Control Engineering and MechatronicsUniversity of PaderbornPaderbornGermany

Personalised recommendations