Advertisement

Do(PLM)Con: An Instrument for Systematic Design of Integrated PLM-Architectures

  • Jörg W. FischerEmail author
  • Bernhard Lammel
  • Dirk Hosenfeld
  • Deodatt Bawachkar
  • Bernd Brinkmeier
Part of the Lecture Notes in Production Engineering book series (LNPE)

Abstract

Today, the purpose of many PLM implementation projects is the realization of PLM-Architectures which aim on product data integration over the dimensions domain, business unit and product line along the Product Development Process. Currently, these projects are mostly addressed like IT-Projects for implementation of domain specific products (e.g. CAx, PDM- or ERP-Systems). Hence the implementation focuses on functional aspects. This focus usually lacks consideration of semantic and progression conception which are key aspects for PLM implementation. To improve this situation the Do(PLM)Con methodology was developed. It provides methods for abstract design of integrated PLM-Architectures including semantics and progression. The following paper will explain the terms semantics and progression in PLM and describe the Do(PLM)Con method as an instrument for systematic design of integrated PLM-Architectures.

Keywords

PLM Product Lifecycle Management PLM-Architectures Do(PLM)Con 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bergsjö, D., Catic, A., Malmqvist, J.: Implementing a service oriented PLM architecture using PLM Services 2.0. In: International Design Conference - Design (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fischer, J.W., Glauche, M.: Skizzierung eines Gestaltungsrahmens für Produktstrukturen. ZWF Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 3, 127–132 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eigner, M., Stelzer, R.: Product Lifecycle Management. Ein Leitfaden für Product Development und Life Cycle Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fischer, J.W., Brinkmeier, B.: Do(PLM)Con - Proposal of a taxonomy for the development of PLM-Architectures. Product Data Journal 1, 24–28 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eigner, M.: PLM versus PPS: Zukünftige Lösungen für ein durchgängiges Produkt- und Prozessmanagement. In: eDM Report; Electronic Data Management, vol. 1, pp. S.20–S.23. Hoppenstedt Publishing, Darmstadt (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rother, M., Shook, J.: Learning to See: Value Stream Mapping to Add Value and Eliminate MUDA, p. S.17. Taylor & Francis (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jörg W. Fischer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bernhard Lammel
    • 1
  • Dirk Hosenfeld
    • 1
  • Deodatt Bawachkar
    • 1
  • Bernd Brinkmeier
    • 1
  1. 1.Siemens Industry Software GmbH & Co. KGStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations