Advertisement

New Perspectives in the Quest for Unification of ‘Lean’ with Traditional Engineering Design Methodology

  • Sören UlonskaEmail author
  • Torgeir Welo
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Production Engineering book series (LNPE)

Abstract

In an increasingly competitive business world, engineering companies need to improve their capability in developing products that offer high value to customers. In this connection, the Toyota Product Development System—commonly referred to as ‘LeanProduct Development—is a benchmark for effective, new practices across industries. Lean contains many of the same elements astraditional engineering design methodologies, developed in the 1970-80s, which describe systematic design and engineering processes. However, the former differs through its philosophical nature—rather than being a methodology or tool—as well as its focus on increasing effectiveness through waste reduction.

In this paper, a literature review of the traditional, systematic product engineering/development methodologies and the more recent lean concept is conducted. Both approaches are analyzed, providing a discussion as to what extent traditional methodologies include elements of lean-thinking and to what extent the associated product engineering processes are lean.

Keywords

product development lean design methods research 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Browning, T.R.: On customer value and improvements in product development processes. Systems Engineering 6(1), 49–61 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cooper, R.G.: How New Product Strategies Impact on Performance. J. Product Innovation Management 1(1), 5–18 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cooper, R.G., Kleinschmidt, E.J.: An Investigation into the New Product Process. J. Product Innovation Management 3(2), 71–85 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cooper, R.: Re-Thinking the Stage-Gate Process – A Reply to the Critics. Management Roundtable Inc. (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ehrlenspiel, K.: Kostengünstig Konstruieren: Kostenwissen, Kosteneinflüsse, Kostensenkung. Konstruktionsbücher Band 35. Springer, Heidelberg (1985)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hein, L., Andreasen, M.M.: Integreret produktudvikling. Jernets Arbejdsgiverforening, Copenhagen (1985)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hubka, V., Andreasen, M., Eder, W.E.: Practical Studies in Systematic Design. Butterworth & Co., London (1988)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kennedy, M.: Product Development for the Lean Enterprise: Why Toyota’s System is Four Times More Productive and How You Can Implement it. The Oklea Press (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liker, J.K.: The Toyota Way – 14 Management Principles from the world’s greatest Manufacturer. McGraw-Hill, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mascitelli, R.: The Lean Product Development Guidebook. Technology Perspectives, Northridge (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moen, R., Norman, C.: Evolution of the PDCA CycleGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morgan, J.M.: High performance Product Development: A Systems Approach to a Lean Product Development Process. PhD Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morgan, M., Liker, J.K.: The Toyota Product Development System. Productivity Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pahl, G., Beitz, W.: Engineering Design. The Design Council, 1st English edn. Springer, London (1984)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., Grote, K.-H.: Konstruktionslehre, 7th edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Park, G.J.: Analytic Methods for Design Practice. Springer (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pulm, U.: Eine systemtheoretische Betrachtung der Produktentwicklung. PhD thesis, Institute of Product Development, Technical University of Munich (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reinertsen, D.G.: Managing the Design Factory - A Product Developer’s Toolkit. The Free Press, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rodenacker, W.G.: Methodisches Konstruieren. Konstruktionsbücher Band 27. Springer, Berlin (1970)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roth, K.: Konstruieren mit Konstruktionskatalogen. Band 1-2. Springer (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sobek, D.K., Smalley, A.: Understanding A3 thinking. Productivity Press, Boca Raton (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Suh, N.P.: Axiomatic design theory of systems. In: Research in Engineering Design, vol. 10, pp. 189–209. Springer-Verlag London (1998)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tjalve, E.: Systematic Design of Industrial Products. Institute for Product Development, Technical University of Denmark, Newnes-Butterworths, London (1979)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ward, A.C., Liker, J.K., Christiano, J.J., Sobek, D.K.: The second Toyota paradox. Sloan Management Review, 43–61 (1995)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ulrich, K.T., Eppinger, S.D.: Product Design and Development. McGraw Hill (2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ward, A.C.: Lean Product and Process Development. Lean Enterprise Institute Inc., Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Welo, T.: On the application of lean principles in Product Development: a commentary on models and practices. Int. J. Product Development 13(4) (2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    VDI-Richtlinie 2221: Methodik zum Entwickeln und Konstruieren technischer Systeme und Produkte. VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf (1993)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Engineering Design and MaterialsNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations