Advertisement

A Structured Approach for Function Based Decomposition of Complex Multi-disciplinary Systems

  • Felician CampeanEmail author
  • Edwin Henshall
  • Unal Yildirim
  • Amad Uddin
  • Huw Williams
Part of the Lecture Notes in Production Engineering book series (LNPE)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to introduce the Systems State Flow Diagram as a structured approach to high level solution-independent function based decomposition of a complex multi-disciplinary system. The approach is discussed in the context of existing function modelling frameworks and in relation to current practice in industry. A generic case study is used to introduce the approach and to highlight the salient features, followed by an illustration on its application to the analysis of an electric vehicle powertrain. Experience with the practical application of the approach with engineering teams is discussed.

Keywords

Systems engineering function decomposition system state function flows product development 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Van Beek, T.J., Tomiyama, T.: Requirements for Complex Systems Modeling. In: The 18th CIRP Design Conference – Design Synthesis (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D’Ameilo, V., Chmarra, M., Tomiyama, T.: Early design interference detection based on qualitative physics. Res. Eng. Design 22, 223–243 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lindemann, U., Maurer, M.: Facing Multi-Domain Complexity in Product Development. In: Proc. 17th CIRP Design Conference. Springer, Berlin (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pimmler, T.U., Eppinger, S.D.: Integration analysis of product decompositions. In: ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Minneapolis (September 1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Browning, T.: Applying the Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problems: A Review and New Directions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 48(3), 292–306 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pahl, P., Beitz, W., Feldusen, J., Grote, K.H.: Engineering Design: A systematic approach, 3rd edn. Springer (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ulrich, K.T., Eppinger, S.D.: Product design and development, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Webb, R.D.: Investigation into the application of robustness and reliability tools to the design process. MSc thesis, University of Bradford (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Otto, K., Wood, K.: Product design: Techniques in reverse engineering and new product development. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stone, R.B., Wood, K.L.: Development of a Functional Basis for design. Journal of Mechanical Design 122, 359–370 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Suh, N.P.: The principles of design. Oxford University Press, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jarratt, T.A.W.: A model-based approach to support the management of engineering change. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Srinivasan, V., Chakrabarti, A., Lindemann, U.: A Framework for Describing Functions in Design. In: Proc. 12th Int. Design Conference DESIGN 2012, Dubrovnik, pp. 1111–1122 (2012) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Umeda, Y., Tomiyama, T.: Functional Reasoning in Design. IEEE Expert: Intelligent Systems and their Applications 12, 275–288 (1997)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Van Beek, T.J., Tomiyama, T.: Integrating Conventional System Views with Function-Behaviour-State Modelling. In: The 19th CIRP Design Conference – Design Synthesis (2009) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sickafus, E.N.: Unified Structured Inventive Thinking: How to Invent. Michigan (1997) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Albers, A., Ohmer, M., Eckert, C.: Engineering design in a different way: cognitive perspective on the contact and channel model approach. In: Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design, July 22-23, 2003. University of Sydney, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Albers, A., Braun, A., Clarkson, P.J., Enkler, H.-J., Wynn, D.: Contact and channel modelling to support early design of technical systems. In: International Conference on Engineering Design – ICED 2009, Stanford, August 24-27 (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Albers, A., Oerding, J., Alink, T.: Abstract objectives can become more tangible with the contact and channel model (C&CM). In: Models and Methods for Variation Management in Global Product Development: Proc. 20th CIRP Design Conference, pp. 203–213 (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Campean, I.F., Henshall, E., Brunson, D., Day, A., McLellan, R., Hartley, J.: A structured approach for function analysis of complex automotive systems. SAE Int. J. Mater. Manuf. 4(1), 1255–1267 (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Henshall, E., Campean, I.F., Brunson, D.: Robust and Reliable Teamwork within Engineering Projects, SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-1273 (2011), doi:10.4271/2011-01-1273Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Campean, F., Henshall, E.: A function failure approach to fault tree analysis for automotive systems. Society of Automotive Engineers Technical Paper: 2008-01-0846 (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rausand, M., Hoyland, A.: System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications, 2nd edn. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Felician Campean
    • 1
    Email author
  • Edwin Henshall
    • 1
  • Unal Yildirim
    • 1
  • Amad Uddin
    • 1
  • Huw Williams
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BradfordBradfordUK

Personalised recommendations