Abstract
The aim of this interpretive qualitative study was to understand how software product management (SPM) activities differ in SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises) and in large enterprises (LEs). We studied thirteen software organizations representing various types of software products and analyzed the collected data by applying the grounded theory method. As a result, we summarized the observations, explaining the main differences between SMEs and LEs and identified SPM activities that are size-dependent, size-independent, and specific for SMEs and LEs only. Our results indicate that the company size affects goals and activities of SPM. Therefore, companies of different size require different approaches in the adoption of SPM activities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ebert, C.: The impacts of software product management. Journal of Systems & Software 80, 850–861 (2007)
Kittlaus, H.-B., Clough, P.: Software Product Management and Pricing. Key Success Factors for Software Organizations. Springer (2009)
van de Weerd, I., Brinkkemper, S., Nieuwenhuis, R., Versendaal, J., Bijlsma, L.: On the Creation of a Reference Framework for Software Product Management: Validation and Tool Support. In: International Workshop on Software Product Management (IWSPM), pp. 3–12 (2006)
Edward, B.: Factors in SWOT Analysis Applied to Micro, Small-to-Medium, and Large Software Enterprises: an Austrian Study. European Management Journal 20, 562–573 (2002)
Karlsson, C., Olsson, O.: Product innovation in small and large enterprises. Small Business Economics 10, 31–46 (1998)
Blili, S., Raymond, L.: Information technology: Threats and opportunities for small and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Information Management 13, 439–448 (1993)
Glaser, B., Strauss, A.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Transaction (1967)
Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications (2008)
Konig, S.J.: Finance as a Stakeholder in Product Management. In: Third International Workshop on Software Product Management, IWSPM 2009, pp. 15–22 (2009)
Kilpi, T.: Improving software product management process: implementation of a product support system. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 3–12 (1998)
Christensen, C., Overdorf, M.: Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change. Harvard Business Review 78, 66–72 (2000)
Isabella, L.: Evolving Interpretations as a Change Unfolds: How Managers Construe Key Organizational Events. The Academy of Management Journal 33, 7–41 (1990)
Suddaby, R.: From the editors: What Grounded Theory is not. Academy of Management Journal 49, 633–642 (2006)
Charmaz, K.: Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Sage Publications (2010)
U.S. Small Business Administration: Table of Small Business Size Standards Matched to North American Industry Classification System Codes (2010), http://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/Size_Standards_Table.pdf
Yin, R.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications (2002)
ATLAS.ti: Qualitative Data Analysis (2011), http://www.atlasti.com/
Corbin, J., Strauss, A.: Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria. Qualitative Sociology 13, 3–21 (1990)
Kilpi, T.: Choosing a SCM-tool: a framework and evaluation. In: Eighth Conference on Software Engineering Environments, pp. 164–172 (1997)
van de Weerd, I., Brinkkemper, S., Nieuwenhuis, R., Versendaal, J., Bijlsma, L.: Towards a Reference Framework for Software Product Management. In: 14th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, pp. 319–322 (2006)
Tsai, W.-H., Lee, P.-L., Shen, Y.-S., Lin, H.-L.: A Comprehensive Study of the Relationship between Enterprise Resource Planning Selection Criteria and Enterprise Resource Planning System Success. Information and Management (article in Press)
Haag, S., Raja, M.K., Schkade, L.L.: Quality function deployment usage in software development. Communications of the ACM 39, 41–49 (1996)
Porter, M.: How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review 57, 137–145 (1979)
Hax, A.C., Wilde, D.L.: The Delta Model: Adaptive Management for a Changing World. Sloan Management Review 40, 11 (1999)
Broom, G.M., Lauzen, M.M., Tucker, K.: Public relations and marketing: Dividing the conceptual domain and operational turf. Public Relations Review 17, 219–225 (1991)
Dver, A.: Software Product Management Essentials. Meghan Kiffer Pr. (2003)
Gorchels, L.: The Product Manager’s Handbook: The Complete Product Management Resource. McGraw-Hill (2000)
Westerberg, M., Singh, J., Häckner, E.: Does the CEO matter? An empirical study of small Swedish firms operating in turbulent environments. Scandinavian Journal of Management 13, 251–270 (1997)
Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Leech, N.L.: Validity and Qualitative Research: An Oxymoron? Quality & Quantity 41, 233–249 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Maglyas, A., Nikula, U., Smolander, K. (2012). Comparison of Software Product Management Practices in SMEs and Large Enterprises. In: Cusumano, M.A., Iyer, B., Venkatraman, N. (eds) Software Business. ICSOB 2012. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 114. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30746-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30746-1_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30745-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30746-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)