Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 435))

Abstract

In May 2011, we organized the Second International Automated Negotiating Agents Competition (ANAC2011) in conjunction with AAMAS 2011. ANAC is an international competition that challenges researchers to develop a successful automated negotiator for scenarios where there is incomplete information about the opponent. One of the goals of this competition is to help steer the research in the area of bilateral multi-issue negotiations, and to encourage the design of generic negotiating agents that are able to operate in a variety of scenarios. Eighteen teams from seven different institutes competed in ANAC2011. This chapter describes the participating agents and the setup of the tournament, including the different negotiation scenarios that were used in the competition. We report on the results of the qualifying and final round of the tournament.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ito, T., Zhang, M., Robu, V., Fatima, S., Matsuo, T. (eds.): New Trends in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations. SCI, vol. 383. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aumann, R.J., Hart, S. (eds.): Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, vol. 1. Elsevier (March 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bazerman, M.H., Neale, M.A.: Negotiator rationality and negotiator cognition: The interactive roles of prescriptive and descriptive research. In: Young, H.P. (ed.) Negotiation Analysis, pp. 109–130. The University of Michigan Press (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Erev, I., Roth, A.: Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibrium. American Economic Review 88(4), 848–881 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. Int. Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems 24(3-4), 159–182 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Using similarity criteria to make negotiation trade-offs. Journal of Artificial Intelligence 142(2), 205–237 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Fatima, S.S., Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Multi-issue negotiation under time constraints. In: AAMAS 2002: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 143–150. ACM, New York (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Ito, T., Hattori, H., Klein, M.: Multi-issue negotiation protocol for agents: Exploring nonlinear utility spaces (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jonker, C.M., Robu, V., Treur, J.: An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation using incomplete preference information. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 15(2), 221–252 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kraus, S.: Strategic Negotiation in Multiagent Environments. MIT Press (October 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kraus, S., Wilkenfeld, J., Zlotkin, G.: Multiagent negotiation under time constraints. Artificial Intelligence 75(2), 297–345 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin, R., Kraus, S., Tykhonov, D., Hindriks, K., Jonker, C.M.: Supporting the Design of General Automated Negotiators. In: Ito, T., Zhang, M., Robu, V., Fatima, S., Matsuo, T., Yamaki, H. (eds.) Innovations in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations. SCI, vol. 319, pp. 69–87. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. McKelvey, R.D., Palfrey, T.R.: An experimental study of the centipede game. Econometrica 60(4), 803–836 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Osborne, M.J., Rubinstein, A.: Bargaining and Markets (Economic Theory, Econometrics, and Mathematical Economics). Academic Press (April 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Osborne, M.J., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rubinstein, A.: Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50(1), 97–109 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katsuhide Fujita .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fujita, K. et al. (2013). The Second Automated Negotiating Agents Competition (ANAC2011). In: Ito, T., Zhang, M., Robu, V., Matsuo, T. (eds) Complex Automated Negotiations: Theories, Models, and Software Competitions. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 435. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30737-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30737-9_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30736-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30737-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics