Skip to main content

Early Fault Detection in Industry Using Models at Various Abstraction Levels

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7321))

Abstract

Most formal models that are used in the industry are close to the level of code, and often ready to be used for code generation. Formal models can also be analysed and verified in order to detect any faults. As the first formal models are often such code-level models, their analysis not only reveals a lot of detailed design faults, but also the more relevant conceptual faults in the design and the requirements. Our observations are based on our experiences in an industrial development project that uses a commercial tool for formal modelling, compositional verification, and code generation. In addition to the provided tool functionality, we have introduced formal techniques to detect conceptual faults during the earlier design and requirements phases. To this end we have made additional formal models, both for the requirements and for the early designs at various abstraction levels. We have analysed these models using simulation and interactive visualization, and we have compared them using refinement checking.

This publication was supported by the Allegio project, as part of the Dutch national program COMMIT, and the ITEA project Care4Me.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrial, J.R.: The B-book: assigning programs to meanings. Cambridge University Press, New York (1996)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Blender, http://www.blender.org/

  3. Boberg, J.: Early fault detection with model-based testing. In: Proceedings of Erlang Workshop 2008, pp. 9–20. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. von Bochmann, G.: Using First-Order Logic to Reason about Submodule Construction. In: Lee, D., Lopes, A., Poetzsch-Heffter, A. (eds.) FMOODS/FORTE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5522, pp. 213–218. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Broadfoot, G.H., Broadfoot, P.J.: Academia and industry meet: Some experiences of formal methods in practice. In: Proceedings of APSEC 2003, pp. 49–58 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. ClearSy: Atelier B, http://www.atelierb.eu/en/

  7. CSK Systems Corporation: VDMTools, http://www.vdmtools.jp/en/

  8. Easterbrook, S.M., Lutz, R.R., Covington, R., Kelly, J., Ampo, Y., Hamilton, D.: Experiences using lightweight formal methods for requirements modeling. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 24(1), 4–14 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eindhoven University of Technology: Software/Hardware Engineering (SHE) - Parallel Object-Oriented Specification Language (POOSL), http://www.es.ele.tue.nl/poosl/

  10. Esterel Technologies: SCADE Suite, http://www.esterel-technologies.com/products/scade-suite/

  11. Fitzgerald, J., Larsen, P.G., Mukherjee, P., Plat, N., Verhoef, M.: Validated Designs for Object-oriented Systems. Springer, New York (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Fitzgerald, J.S., Larsen, P.G.: Balancing Insight and Effort: The Industrial Uptake of Formal Methods. In: Jones, C.B., Liu, Z., Woodcock, J. (eds.) Formal Methods and Hybrid Real-Time Systems. LNCS, vol. 4700, pp. 237–254. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Formal Systems (Europe) Ltd: FDR2, http://www.fsel.com/

  14. Formal Systems (Europe) Ltd and Oxford University Computing Laboratory: Failures-Divergence Refinement – FDR2 User Manual, 9th edn. (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goga, N., Romijn, J.: Guiding Spin Simulation. In: Davies, J., Schulte, W., Barnett, M. (eds.) ICFEM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3308, pp. 176–193. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Groote, J.F., Osaiweran, A., Wesselius, J.H.: Analyzing the effects of formal methods on the development of industrial control software. In: Proceedings of ICSM 2011, pp. 467–472. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Haghverdi, E., Ural, H.: Submodule construction from concurrent system specifications. Information & Software Technology 41(8), 499–506 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Holzmann, G.J.: Early fault detection tools. Software - Concepts and Tools 17(2), 63–69 (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Holzmann, G.J.: Formal Methods for Early Fault Detection. In: Jonsson, B., Parrow, J. (eds.) FTRTFT 1996. LNCS, vol. 1135, pp. 40–54. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Hooman, J., Huis in ’t Veld, R., Schuts, M.: Experiences with a Compositional Model Checker in the Healthcare Domain. In: George, C. (ed.) FHIES 2011. LNCS, vol. 7151, pp. 93–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hopcroft, P.J., Broadfoot, G.H.: Combining the box structure development method and CSP for software development. ENTCS 128(6), 127–144 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Larsen, K.G., Xinxin, L.: Equation solving using modal transition systems. In: Proceedings of LICS 1990, pp. 108–117. IEEE Computer Society (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li, L., Hooman, J., Voeten, J.: Connecting technical and non-technical views of system architectures. In: Proceedings of CPSCom 2010, pp. 592–599 (December 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Roscoe, A.W., Armstrong, P.J., Pragyesh: Local Search in Model Checking. In: Liu, Z., Ravn, A.P. (eds.) ATVA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5799, pp. 22–38. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Roscoe, B.: Understanding Concurrent Systems. Springer (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ryan, P.Y.A., Schneider, S.A., Goldsmith, M.H., Lowe, G., Roscoe, A.W.: The Modelling and Analysis of Security Protocols: the CSP Approach. Pearson Education (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sun, J., Liu, Y., Dong, J.S.: Model checking CSP revisited: Introducing a process analysis toolkit. In: Proceedings of ISoLA 2008. CCIS, vol. 17, pp. 307–322. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Theelen, B.D., Florescu, O., Geilen, M., Huang, J., van der Putten, P.H.A., Voeten, J.: Software/hardware engineering with the parallel object-oriented specification language. In: Proceedings of MEMOCODE 2007, pp. 139–148. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Verum Software Technologies: ASD:Suite, http://www.verum.com/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hooman, J., Mooij, A.J., van Wezep, H. (2012). Early Fault Detection in Industry Using Models at Various Abstraction Levels. In: Derrick, J., Gnesi, S., Latella, D., Treharne, H. (eds) Integrated Formal Methods. IFM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7321. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30729-4_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30729-4_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30728-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30729-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics