Skip to main content

Choices, Choices: Comparing between CHOC’LATE and the Classification-Tree Methodology

  • Conference paper
Book cover Reliable Software Technologies – Ada-Europe 2012 (Ada-Europe 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7308))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Two popular specification-based test case generation methods are the choice relation framework and the classification-tree methodology. Both of them come with associated tools and have been used in different applications with success. Since both methods are based on the idea of partition testing, they are similar in many aspects. Because of their similarities, software testers often find it difficult to decide which method to be used in a given testing scenario. This paper aims to provide a solution by first contrasting the strengths and weaknesses of both methods, followed by suggesting practical selection guidelines to cater for different testing scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amla, N., Ammann, P.E.: Using Z Specifications in Category Partition Testing. In: Systems Integrity, Software Safety, and Process Security: Building the Right System Right: Proceedings of the 7th Annual IEEE Conference on Computer Assurance (COMPASS 1992), pp. 3–10. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Briand, L.C., Labiche, Y., Bawar, Z., Spido, N.T.: Using Machine Learning to Refine Category-Partition Test Specifications and Test Suites. Information and Software Technology 51(11), 1551–1564 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan, E.Y.K., Chan, W.K., Poon, P.-L., Yu, Y.T.: An Empirical Evaluation of Several Test-a-Few Strategies for Testing Particular Conditions. Software: Practice and Experience (2011), doi:10.1002/spe.1098

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, T.Y., Poon, P.-L., Tang, S.-F., Tse, T.H.: On the Identification of Categories and Choices for Specification-Based Test Case Generation. Information and Software Technology 46(13), 887–898 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, T.Y., Poon, P.-L., Tang, S.-F., Tse, T.H.: DESSERT: a DividE-and-conquer methodology for identifying categorieS, choiceS, and choicE Relations for Test case generation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (2011), doi:10.1109/TSE.2011.69

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, T.Y., Poon, P.-L., Tse, T.H.: An Integrated Classification-Tree Methodology for Test Case Generation. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 10(6), 647–679 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, T.Y., Poon, P.-L., Tse, T.H.: A Choice Relation Framework for Supporting Category-Partition Test Case Generation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 29(7), 577–593 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chusho, T.: Test Data Selection and Quality Estimation Based on the Concept of Essential Branches for Path Testing. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 13(5), 509–517 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Foreman, L.M., Zweben, S.H.: A Study of the Effectiveness of Control and Data Flow Testing Strategies. Journal of Systems and Software 21(3), 215–228 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grochtmann, M., Grimm, K.: Classification Trees for Partition Testing. Software Testing, Verification and Reliability 3(2), 63–82 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hierons, R.M., Harman, M., Fox, C., Ouarbya, L., Daoudi, M.: Conditioned Slicing Supports Partition Testing. Software Testing, Verification and Reliability 12(1), 23–28 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hierons, R.M., Harman, M., Singh, H.: Automatically Generating Information from a Z Specification to Support the Classification Tree Method. In: Bert, D., Bowen, J.P., King, S., Waldén, M. (eds.) ZB 2003. LNCS, vol. 2651, pp. 388–407. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang, B., Tse, T.H., Grieskamp, W., Kicillof, N., Cao, Y., Li, X., Chan, W.K.: Assuring the Model Evolution of Protocol Software Specifications by Regression Testing Process Improvement. Software: Practice and Experience 41(10), 1073–1103 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kansomkeat, S., Thiket, P., Offutt, J.: Generating Test Cases from UML Activity Diagrams Using the Condition-Classification Tree Method. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Software Technology and Engineering (ICSTE 2010), pp. V1-62–V1-66. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lemos, O.A.L., Vincenzi, A.M.R., Maldonado, J.C., Masiero, P.C.: Control and Data Flow Structural Testing Criteria for Aspect-Oriented Programs. Journal of Systems and Software 80(6), 862–882 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Myers, G.J.: The Art of Software Testing. Wiley, Hoboken (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ostrand, T.J., Balcer, M.J.: The Category-Partition Method for Specifying and Generating Functional Tests. Communications of the ACM 31(6), 676–686 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Poon, P.-L., Tang, S.-F., Tse, T.H., Chen, T.Y.: CHOC’LATE: a Framework for Specification-Based Testing. Communications of the ACM 53(4), 113–118 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Poon, P.-L., Tse, T.H., Tang, S.-F., Kuo, F.-C.: Contributions of Tester Experience and a Checklist Guideline to the Identification of Categories and Choices for Software Testing. Software Quality Journal 19(1), 141–163 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Richardson, D.J., O’Malley, O., Tittle, C.: Approaches to Specification-Based Testing. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT 3rd Symposium on Software Testing, Analysis, and Verification (TAV 3), pp. 86–96. ACM, New York (1989)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Shepard, T., Lamb, M., Kelly, D.: More Testing should be Taught. Communications of the ACM 44(6), 103–108 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Singh, H., Conrad, M., Sadeghipour, S.: Test Case Design Based on Z and the Classification-Tree Method. In: Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Formal Engineering Methods (ICFEM 1997), pp. 81–90. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Subramanian, G.H., Nosek, J., Raghunathan, S.P., Kanitkar, S.S.: A Comparison of the Decision Table and Tree. Communications of the ACM 35(1), 89–94 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu, Y.T., Ng, S.P., Chan, E.Y.K.: Generating, Selecting and Prioritizing Test Cases from Specifications with Tool Support. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Quality Software (QSIC 2003), pp. 83–90. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Poon, PL., Chen, T.Y., Tse, T.H. (2012). Choices, Choices: Comparing between CHOC’LATE and the Classification-Tree Methodology. In: Brorsson, M., Pinho, L.M. (eds) Reliable Software Technologies – Ada-Europe 2012. Ada-Europe 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7308. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30598-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30598-6_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30597-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30598-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics