Skip to main content

Impact of ATLAS Jet Data on PDF Fits

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 367 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

Abstract

The knowledge of parton distribution functions is a fundamental input to theoretical predictions in hadronic collisions. The uncertainty on the PDFs feeds into the theoretical uncertainty on the inclusive jet cross section, as shown in the previous chapter. It also impacts new physics measurements in terms of e.g. the QCD background model used and expected production cross sections

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is generally done exploiting external programs.

  2. 2.

    This assumption does not necessarily hold in the inclusive jet cross section, where jets in different bins come from the same event. Even though correlations can be relevant in bins with low statistics (as in the case of high \(p_T\)/high rapidity bins) and have been estimated after the unfolding procedure, the treatment of correlated statistical uncertainties in PDF fits is left for future studies.

  3. 3.

    The Hessian matrix represents the error on a measurement \(X\) due to the different parameters \(i\) and \(j\) (\(\sigma ^2_X=(\partial _i \partial _j \chi ^2_{min}) (\partial _i \partial _j X)\), where \(\partial _k\) represents the partial derivative of a quantity with respect to the \(k\)-th PDF parameter. The underlying assumption that linear error propagation holds is made).

  4. 4.

    This is not necessarily worrisome because the gluon density is not an observable quantity and it has to be convoluted with coefficient functions. On the other hand if the structure function related to the gluon PDF were predicted to have the same negative behaviour, it would indicate a breakdown of the DGLAP formalism at these scales. This is also hinted at by the values of the \(B\) coefficients for gluon and sea: at low \(Q^2\), \(B_g > B_{sea}\), contradicting the common idea that sea quarks are produced mainly from gluon splitting.

References

  1. W. J. Stirling, Private communication. http://www.hep.phy.cam.ac.uk/wjs/plots/plots.html

  2. H1 and ZEUS Collaboration, V. Radescu, Combination and QCD analysis of the HERA inclusive cross sections, PoS ICHEP2010 168 (2010) . http://pubdb.desy.de/fulltext/getfulltext.php?uid=13358-38069

  3. S. Forte, Parton distributions at the dawn of the LHC. Acta Phys. Polon. B41, 2859—2920 (2010), arXiv:1011.5247 [hep-ph]

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Sherstnev, R.S. Thorne, Parton distributions for LO generators. Eur. Phys. J. C55, 553–575 (2008), arXiv:0711.2473 [hep-ph]

    Google Scholar 

  5. A.D. Martin, W.J. Stirling, R.S. Thorne, G. Watt, Parton distributions for the LHC. Eur. Phys. J. C63, 189–285 (2009), arXiv:0901.0002 [hep-ph]

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Pumplin et al., New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis. JHEP 07, 012 (2002), arXiv:0201195 [hep-ph]

    Google Scholar 

  7. H.-L. Lai et al., New parton distributions for collider physics. Phys. Rev. D82, 074024 (2010) , arXiv:arXiv:1007.2241 [hep-ph]

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. D. Ball et al., A first unbiased global NLO determination of parton distributions and their uncertainties. Nucl. Phys. B838, 136–206 (2010), arXiv:arXiv:1002.4407 [hep-ph]

    Google Scholar 

  9. ATLAS Collaboration, Comparisons of the measured inclusive jet cross section to a selection of NLO QCD predictions, and a study of the parton content of the calculations, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-005, CERN, Geneva, Apr, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Botje, Error estimates on parton density distributions. J. Phys. G28, 779–790 (2002), arXiv:0110123 [hep-ph]

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Stump et al., Uncertainties of predictions from parton distribution functions 1. The Lagrange multiplier method. Phys. Rev. D65, 014012 (2001), arXiv:0101051 [hep-ph]

    Google Scholar 

  12. H1 Collaboration, Measurement of the inclusive ep scattering cross sections at low \(Q^2\) and \(x\) at HERA. Eur. Phys. J. C63, 625–678 (2009), arXiv:0904.0929 [hep-ex]

    Google Scholar 

  13. H1 and ZEUS Collaboration, F.D. Aaron et al., Combined Measurement and QCD analysis of the inclusive ep scattering cross sections at HERA. JHEP 01, 109, (2010), arXiv:0911.0884 [hep-ex]

    Google Scholar 

  14. ZEUS Collaboration, A. Cooper-Sarkar, https://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=14&sessionId=4&resId=1&materialId=slides&confId=97834

  15. CHORUS Collaboration Collaboration, A. Kayis-Topaksu et al., Leading order analysis of neutrino induced dimuon events in the CHORUS experiment. Nucl .Phys. B798, 1–16, (2008), arXiv:0804.1869 [hep-ex]

    Google Scholar 

  16. Particle Data Group Collaboration, C. Amsler et al., Review of particle physics. Phys. Lett. B667, 1–1340 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Thorne, R. Roberts, An ordered analysis of heavy flavor production in deep inelastic scattering. Phys. Rev. D57, 6871–6898 (1998), arXiv:9709442[hep-ph]

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Thorne, A variable-flavor number scheme for NNLO. Phys. Rev. D73, 054019 (2006), arXiv:0601245[hep-ph]

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Botje, QCDNUM: Fast QCD evolution and convolution. Comput. Phys. Commun. 182, 490–532 (2011), arXiv:1005.1481 [hep-ph]

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Collins, Renormalization: An Introduction to Renormalization, the Renormalization Group and the Operator-Product Expansion, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. Flacher et al., Revisiting the global electroweak fit of the standard model and beyond with gfitter. Eur. Phys. J. C60, 543–583 (2009), arXiv:0811.0009 [hep-ph].[Erratum-ibid.C71:1718,2011]

    Google Scholar 

  22. GFitter Collaboration, Results for the Global Electroweak Standard Model Fit, including latest results from July 2011 (EPS11), http://gfitter.desy.de/Standard_Model/

  23. H1 and Z. collaborations, QCD analysis and determination of \(\alpha _s\) using the combined H1 and ZEUS inclusive cross sections together with the jet production cross section measured by the H1 and the ZEUS experiments, H1prelim-11-034, ZEUS-prel-11-001, DESY, Hamburg, Nov, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. Whitehead, A Measurement of the \(W\) Boson Charge Asymmetry with the ATLAS Detector. PhD thesis, 2011

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Doglioni, C. (2012). Impact of ATLAS Jet Data on PDF Fits. In: Measurement of the Inclusive Jet Cross Section with the ATLAS Detector at the Large Hadron Collider. Springer Theses. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30538-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30538-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30537-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30538-2

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics