Skip to main content

Reusable and Correct Endogenous Model Transformations

  • Conference paper
Theory and Practice of Model Transformations (ICMT 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7307))

Abstract

Correctness of model transformations is a prerequisite for generating correct implementations from models. Given refining model transformations that preserve desirable properties, models can be transformed into correct-by-construction implementations. However, proving that model transformations preserve properties is far from trivial. Therefore, we aim for simple correctness proofs by designing model transformations that are as fine-grained as possible. Furthermore, we advocate the reuse of model transformations to reduce the number of proofs. For a simple domain-specific language, SLCO, we define a formal framework to reason about the correctness, reusability, and composition of the fine-grained model transformations used to transform a given model to three target languages: NQC, Promela and POOSL. The correctness criterion induces that the original model and the resulting model obtained after a proper sequence of transformations have the same observable behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van Amstel, M.F., van den Brand, M.G.J., Engelen, L.J.P.: An Exercise in Iterative Domain-Specific Language Design. In: Proc. of EVOL/IWPSE 2010, pp. 48–57. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. van Amstel, M.F., van den Brand, M.G.J., Engelen, L.J.P.: Using a DSL and Fine-Grained Model Transformations to Explore the Boundaries of Model Verification. In: Proc. ICSTW 2011, pp. 63–66. IEEE Computer Society (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. van Amstel, M.F., van den Brand, M.G.J., Protić, Z., Verhoeff, T.: Transforming Process Algebra Models into UML State Machines: Bridging a Semantic Gap? In: Vallecillo, A., Gray, J., Pierantonio, A. (eds.) ICMT 2008. LNCS, vol. 5063, pp. 61–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Andova, S., van den Brand, M.G.J., Engelen, L.: Prototyping the Semantics of a DSL using ASF+SDF: Link to Formal Verification of DSL Models. In: AMMSE, pp. 65–79 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baum, D.: NQC Programmer’s Guide (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Nicola, R., Vaandrager, F.W.: Three logics for branching bisimulation. Journal of the ACM 42, 458–487 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Ehrig, H., Ermel, C.: Semantical Correctness and Completeness of Model Transformations Using Graph and Rule Transformation. In: Ehrig, H., Heckel, R., Rozenberg, G., Taentzer, G. (eds.) ICGT 2008. LNCS, vol. 5214, pp. 194–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Hülsbusch, M., König, B., Rensink, A., Semenyak, M., Soltenborn, C., Wehrheim, H.: Showing Full Semantics Preservation in Model Transformation - A Comparison of Techniques. In: Méry, D., Merz, S. (eds.) IFM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6396, pp. 183–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Giese, H., Glesner, S., Leitner, J., Schäfer, W., Wagner, R.: Towards Verified Model Transformations. In: Proc. MoDeVa 2006, pp. 78–93 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. van Glabbeek, R.J.: The Linear Time–Branching Time Spectrum II: The Semantics of Sequential Systems with Silent Moves. In: Best, E. (ed.) CONCUR 1993. LNCS, vol. 715, pp. 66–81. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. van Glabbeek, R.J., Weijland, P.: Branching Time and Abstraction in Bisimulation Semantics. Journal of the ACM 43, 555–600 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Holzmann, G.J.: The model checker SPIN. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 23(5), 279–295 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Karsai, G., Narayanan, A.: On the Correctness of Model Transformations in the Development of Embedded Systems. In: Kordon, F., Sokolsky, O. (eds.) Monterey Workshop 2006. LNCS, vol. 4888, pp. 1–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Plotkin, G.D.: A Structural Approach to Operational Semantics. Technical Report DAIMI FN-19, University of Aarhus (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schätz, B.: Verification of Model Transformations. ECEASST 29 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schmidt, D.C.: Model-Driven Engineering. Computer 39(2), 25–31 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Theelen, B.D., et al.: Software/Hardware Engineering with the Parallel Object-Oriented Specification Language. In: Proc. MEMOCODE 2007, pp. 139–148. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Varró, D.: Automated formal verification of visual modeling languages by model checking. Software and System Modeling 3(2), 85–113 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Andova, S., van den Brand, M.G.J., Engelen, L. (2012). Reusable and Correct Endogenous Model Transformations. In: Hu, Z., de Lara, J. (eds) Theory and Practice of Model Transformations. ICMT 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7307. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30476-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30476-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30475-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30476-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics