A Tussle Analysis for Information-Centric Networking Architectures

  • Alexandros Kostopoulos
  • Ioanna Papafili
  • Costas Kalogiros
  • Tapio Levä
  • Nan Zhang
  • Dirk Trossen
Open Access
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7281)

Abstract

Current Future Internet (FI) research brings out the trend of designing information-oriented networks, in contrast to the current host-centric Internet. Information-centric Networking (ICN) focuses on finding and transmitting information to end-users, instead of connecting end hosts that exchange data. The key concepts of ICN are expected to have significant impact on the FI, and to create new challenges for all associated stakeholders. In order to investigate the motives as well as the arising conflicts between the stakeholders, we apply a tussle analysis methodology in a content delivery scenario incorporating socio-economic principles. Our analysis highlights the interests of the various stakeholders and the issues that should be taken into account by designers when deploying new content delivery schemes under the ICN paradigm.

Keywords

information-centric networking content delivery future internet architecture tussles incentives socio-economics value network 

References

  1. 1.
    Clark, D.D., Lehr, W., Bauer, S., Faratin, P., Sami, R., Wroclawski, J.: Overlay Networks and the Future of the Internet. Communications and Strategies 63, 109–129 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clark, D.D., Wroclawski, J., Sollins, K.R., Braden, R.: Tussle in Cyberspace: Defining Tomorrow’s Internet. IEEE/ ACM Trans. Networking 13(3), 462–475 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kalogiros, C., Kostopoulos, A., Ford, A.: On Designing for Tussle: Future Internet in Retrospect. In: Oliver, M., Sallent, S. (eds.) EUNICE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5733, pp. 98–107. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown, I., Clark, D., Trossen, D.: Should Specific Values Be Embedde. The Internet Architecture? In: ACM Context ReArch 2010 (December 2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    EU FP7 SESERV project, http://www.seserv.org/
  6. 6.
    EU FP7 PURSUIT project, http://www.fp7-pursuit.eu/
  7. 7.
    EU FP7 SAIL project, http://www.sail-project.eu/
  8. 8.
    Kalogiros, C., Courcoubetis, C., Stamoulis, G.D., Boniface, M., Meyer, E.T., Waldburger, M., Field, D., Stiller, B.: An Approach to Investigating Socio-economic Tussles Arising from Building the Future Internet. In: Domingue, J., et al. (eds.) FIA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6656, pp. 145–159. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Casey, T., Smura, T., Sorri, A.: Value Network Configurations in wireless local area access. In: 9th Conference of Telecommunication, Media and Internet (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Trossen, D., Kostopoulos, A.: Exploring the Tussle Space for Information-Centric Networking. In: 39th TPRC, Arlington, VA (September 2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sterman, J.: Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill, Irwin (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Named Data Networking (NDN) project, http://www.named-data.net/
  13. 13.
    Trossen, D., Sarela, M., Sollins, K.: Arguments for an Information-Centric Internetworking Architecture. ACM Computer Communication Review (April 2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pöyhönen, P., Stranberg, O. (eds.): (D-B.1) The Network of Information: Architecture and Applications. SAIL project deliverable (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandros Kostopoulos
    • 1
  • Ioanna Papafili
    • 1
  • Costas Kalogiros
    • 1
  • Tapio Levä
    • 2
  • Nan Zhang
    • 2
  • Dirk Trossen
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsAthens University of Economics and BusinessAthensGreece
  2. 2.Department of Communications and NetworkingAalto UniversityEspooFinland
  3. 3.Computer LaboratoryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations