Skip to main content

A Planetary Environmental Simulator/Test Facility

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Protection of Materials and Structures From the Space Environment

Part of the book series: Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings ((ASSSP,volume 32))

Abstract

Under a 2-year program funded by the Canadian Space Agency, ITL Inc. is developing and manufacturing a Planetary Environmental Simulator/Test Facility to be used for testing and life-time evaluation of candidate spacecraft materials and mechanical systems, space suits, and planetary mission crew habitats. The basic facility will include a vacuum chamber and a number of environmental sources to simulate the planetary surface environments, including dust particles, UV radiation, temperature conditions and darkness, as well as simple fixtures and test rigs enabling to conduct mechanical testing of planetary rovers’ components.

The stainless steel high-vacuum chamber is cylindrical in shape with one of its ends designed to have a semi-spherical shape. The cylindrical part of the simulation chamber is 30″ in diameter and ~51″ long. The sample holder/sample transfer system allows a total displacement of ~12″ inside the chamber and allows for heating, cooling, and thermal cycling of the samples. The basic dust particles’ source includes a lunar/Martian soil simulant container, a dust refill compartment, and a funnel-like enclosure in which the dust cloud is generated and designed to confine the dust and prevent it from spreading all over the chamber. The dust is activated by a paddle actuator located inside the source, allowing generating dust clouds of different intensity and configuration. The source is designed also to mix the particles during the dust simulant conditioning stage.

A multi-stage evolutionary path of the facility is outlined with the aim to create an advanced test facility that will be used to support the design, testing, and validation of Canadian space robotic hardware.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. The global exploration strategy: The framework for coordination. April 2007

    Google Scholar 

  2. European Space Agency (2010) The global space exploration strategy. http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Space_Exploration_Strategy/SEMDAM0YUFF_0.html. Accessed 19 Aug 2011

  3. Gaier JR, Sechkar EA (2009) Lunar simulation in the lunar dust adhesion bell jar. Report NASA/TM-2007-214704

    Google Scholar 

  4. Craven P, Vaughn J, Schneider T, Norwood J, Abbas M, Alexander R (2009) MSFC lunar environments test system (LETS) system development. Third lunar regolith simulant workshop, Huntsville, 17–20 Mar 2009

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vaughn JA, Schneider T, Craven P, Norwood J (2008) LETS: lunar environments test system. Lunar regolith behavior workshop, Houston, 12–14 Aug 2008

    Google Scholar 

  6. NASA scientific and technical aerospace reports (2009) 47(15): 134

    Google Scholar 

  7. NASA GSFC lunar systems capabilities. http://explorationatgoddard.gsfc.nasa.gov/pubs/gsfc-lss.pdf. Accessed 19 Aug 2011

  8. NASA GSFC dust environmental effects particle chamber (DEEP). http://explorationatgoddard.gsfc.nasa.gov/techpdf/DeepChamber_Goddard.pdf. Accessed 19 Aug 2011

  9. Davies GR, Mason NJ, Gómez F, Prieto O, Helbert J, Colangeli L, Srama R, Barnes D, Merrison J (2009) Europlanet research infrastructure: planetary simulation facilities. European planetary science congress, EPSC abstracts vol 4, p 63

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kochan H et al (1991) Laboratory comet simulation experiments. Geophys Res 18(2):243–291

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kochan H, Feibig W, Möhlmann D, Willnecker R et al (1997) The new planetary simulation facility of DLR – and its first full operational performance during a breadboard – test of a small sample acquisition and aistribution tool (SSA/DT) for space mission applications to Mars, Moon, and Comets. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on environmental testing for space programs, ESTEC, Noordwijk, 24–27 June 1997

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tankosic D, Abbas MM (2008) Measurements on charging of Apollo 11 and 17 lunar dust grains by low energy electrons. In: Proceedings of the 39th lunar and planetary science conference (Lunar and planetary science XXXIX), League city, 10–14 Mar 2008

    Google Scholar 

  13. Abbud-Madrid A, Dreyer CB, Nakagawa M, Olhoeft GR, King R, Eustes AW, Moore JJ (2008) Lunar science capabilities at the Colorado School of Mines. In: Proceedings of the NLSI lunar science conference, Moffett Field, 20–23 July 2008

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smithers GA, Nehls MK, Hovater MA, Evans SW, Miller JS, Broughton RM, Beale D, Kilinc-Balci F (2007) A one-piece lunar regolith bag garage prototype. Report NASA/TM-2007-215073

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fan SC, Feng YQ, Zheng QJ (2005) A study of experimental facility for lunar rover development. In: Proceedings of the international lunar conference, Toronto, 13–19 Sept 2005

    Google Scholar 

  16. The large space simulator. http://ams.cern.ch/AMS/CGSE/Documents/SJTU/CD%20From%20SJTU%20(March%2014,%202008)/lss.pdf. Accessed 19 Aug 2011

  17. Gaier JR (2008) The effects of lunar dust on EVA systems during the Apollo missions. Report NASA/TM-2005-213610

    Google Scholar 

  18. International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety. Newsletter. July 2008

    Google Scholar 

  19. Calle CI, McFall JL, Buhler CR, Snyder SJ, Arens EE, Chen A, Ritz ML, Clements JS, Fortier CR, Trigwell S (2008) Dust particle removal by electrostatic and dielectrophoretic forces with applications to NASA exploration missions. In: Proceedings of the electrostatics society of America Annual meeting, Minneapolis, 17–19 June

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marcy JL, Shalanski AC, Yarmuch MAR, Patchett BM (2004) Materials choices for Mars. J Mat Eng Perform 13(2):208–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. ASTM D3884 – 09 Standard Guide for Abrasion Resistance of Textile Fabrics (Rotary Platform, Double-Head Method)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kleiman J, Horodetsky S, Sergeyev V, Issoupov V (2006) Critical review of the design of space environment simulators: lessons Learnt. In: Proceedings of the 10th international symposium on materials in a space environment/8th international conference on protection of materials and structure from the LEO space environment, Collioure, 19–23 June

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kleiman J, Horodetsky S, Sergeyev V, Issoupov V (2006) CO2-laser assisted atomic oxygen beam sources: research, development, and optimization of operational parameters. In: Proceedings of the 10th international symposium on materials in a space environment/8th international conference on protection of materials and structure from the LEO space environment, Collioure, 19–23 June

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gaier JR, Jaworske DA (2007) Lunar dust on heat rejection system surfaces: problems and prospects. Report NASA/TM-2007-214814

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gaier JR, Siamidis J, Larkin EMG (2008) Extraction of thermal performance values from samples in the lunar dust adhesion bell jar. In: Proceedings of the 25th space simulation conference, Annapolis, 20–23 Oct

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gaier JR, Siamidis J, Panko SR, Rogers KJ, Larkin EMG (2008) The effect of simulated lunar dust on the absorptivity, emissivity, and operating temperature on AZ-93 and Ag/FEP thermal control surfaces. Report NASA/TM-2008-215492

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kleiman J (2002) Fretting and fatigue damage in the space environment: design and test evaluation of fretting fatigue rig in vacuum environment. Final Report ITL-061202-0620, Orenda Aerospace Corp Contract Project ID RD6941

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

A large part of this work has been conducted under a 2-year STDP program with support from the Canadian Space Agency under the Contract No. 9F028-071181/016/MTB “A Planetary Environmental Simulator/Test Facility for Future Space Exploration Missions”. The authors would like to thank P.Eng. Sid Saraf and Dr. Xin Xiang Jiang from the Canadian Space Agency for general management of this project and for valuable discussions, as well as Ms. Agnes Tang for the SEM/EDS analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob Kleiman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kleiman, J., Horodetsky, S., Issoupov, V. (2013). A Planetary Environmental Simulator/Test Facility. In: Kleiman, J., Tagawa, M., Kimoto, Y. (eds) Protection of Materials and Structures From the Space Environment. Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings, vol 32. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30229-9_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30229-9_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30228-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30229-9

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics