Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Maligne Tumoren der Mamma

  • Chapter
Therapiehandbuch Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

  • 4988 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Mit der Selbstuntersuchung der eigenen Brust und dem Entdecken eines Knotens in der Brust können allein durch die Methode bedingt vielfach erst fortgeschrittene Tumorstadien des Mammakarzinoms festgestellt werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Aebi DR, Allegra CJ, Ganschow P et al. (2010) Primary breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol (Suppl 5): 9–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie – AGO (2011) AGO-Therapieempfehlungen. [http://www.ago-online.de/index.php?lang=de&site=mamma_guide_topical&topic=mamma_guide]

  • Barton MB, Harris R, Flezcher SW (1999) Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination should it be done? How? JAMA 282:1270–1280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley ME (1994) The pedicled TRAM as preference for immediate autogenous tissue breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 21:191–205

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK et al. (2005) Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:1784–1792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Böhm J, Zikan (2011) Einfluss der prognostischen Faktoren auf die Therapie des duktalen Carcinoma in situ der Brust. Geburtsh Frauenheilkd 71:967–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins LC, Tamimi RM, Baer HJ et al. (2005) Outcome of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ untrested after diagnostic biopsy: results from the Nurses’ Health Study. Cancer 103:1778–1784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne C, Burke JP, Marrow M et al (2009) Effect of margin status on local recurrence after breast conservation and radiation therapy for ductal caarcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 27:1615–1620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faverly DR, Burgers L, Bult P, Holland R (1994) Three dimensional imaging of mammary ductal carcinoma in situ: clinical implications. Semin Diagn Pathol 11:193–198

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher B, Anderon S (1994) Conservative surgery for the management of invasive and noninvasive carcinoma of the breast: NSABP trials. World J Surg 18:63–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK, Wolmark N, Wickerham DL, Cronin WM (1995) Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breat cancer. N Engl J Med 333:1456–1461

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher B, Land S, Mamounas E et al. (2001) Prevention of invasive breast cancer in women with ductal carcinoma in situ: an update of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project experience. Semin Oncol 28(4): 400–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs R, Guggenberger D, Karl C (Hrsg) (2004/2005) Mammakarzinom – Diagnostik und Therapie. Manual des Euregio-Brustzentrums (Sitz Eschweiler).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche BGalimbertiVCole, Zurrida S et al. (2011) International, and B.C.S.G.T.-Investigators. Update of International Breast Cancer Study Group trial 23–01 to compare axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with clinically node negative breast cancer and micrometastasis in the sentinel lymph node SABCS Abstract S3–1

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber B et al. (2009) The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended followupü study. Ann Surg 249:461–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV et al. (2011) Axillary dissection vs. no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel lymph node metastases. JAMA 305:569–575

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS et al. (2011) Strategies for subtypes – dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer. Ann Oncol 22:1737–1747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halsted WS (1894) The results of operations for the cure of cancer of breast performed at the Johns Hopkins Hospital from June 1989 to January 1894. Johns Hopk Hosp Rep 4:297

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooperationsgemeinschaft Mammographie (2009) Evaluationsbericht 2005–2007. [http://mammo-programm.de/cms_upload/datenpool/evaluationsbericht05–07_web.pdf]

  • Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB et al. (2010) Primary outcome results of NSABP B-32– a randomized phase III clinical trial to compare sentinel node resection (SNR) to conventional axillary dissection (AD) in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 28: (18) (Suppl): Abstract LBA 505

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreienberg R, Kopp I, Albert US et al. (2008) Interdisziplinäre S3-Leitlinie für die Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Mammakarzinoms. Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V. Zuckschwerdt, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreienberg R, Jonat W, Volm T, Möbus V, Alt D (2006) Management des Mammakarzinoms, 3. Aufl. Springer, Heidelberg Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühn T, Santjohanser C, Kreienberg R (2000) Bedeutung des Sentinel-Lymphknotens. Dtsch Ärztebl 97: 2102–2105

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühn T, Bembenek A, Decker T et al. (2005) A concept for the clinical implementation of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast carcinoma with spezial regard to quality assurance. Cancer 103:451–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kühn T (2011) Mammakarzinom – Stellenwert des axillären Staging. Gynäkologe 44: 999–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR (2005) American Society of Clinical Oncology Guidelines recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in eraly-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:7703–7720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guidelines NCCN, Version 2.2011 [http://www.nccn.org/pro-fessionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf]

  • Malek D, Rabe P (2011) Mammografie-Screening-Programm. Im Interenet: [http://mammo-programm.de/cms_upload/datenpool/evaluationsbericht05–07_web.pdf] (Stand 27.06.2011)

  • Melcher C et al. (2012) Breast cancer – state of the art. Geburtsh Frauenheilkd 72:215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nitz U, Maass N (2011) Empfehlungen gynäkologische Onkologie Kommission Mamma [www.ago-online/download/unprotected/g_mamma_11_1_0d_08_dcis.pdf] (Stand 27.06.2011)

  • Petrelli F, Barni S (2011) Tamoxifen added to radiotherapy and surgery fort he treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a met-analysis of 2 randomized trials Radiother Oncol 100: 195–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfandzelter R, Wulfing U, Boedeker B et al. (2010) Diagnostic image quality of mammograms in German outpatient medical care. Geburtsh Frauenheilkd 70:998–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recht A, Houlihan MJ (1995) Axillary lymph nodes and breast cancer. Cancer 76:1491–1512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneeweiß A, Wacker J, Sohn C (2006) Das Südwestdeutsche Brustcentrum (SWBC) – ein Netzwerk zur Qualitätssicherung in der Diagnostik und Therapie des Mammakarzinomes. Breast Care 1:134–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholzen T, Gerdes J (2000) The Ki-67 protein: from the known and the unknown. J Cell Physiol 182:311–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sener SF, Winchester DJ, Winchester DP (1999) Spectrum of mammographically detected breast cancers. Am Surg 65:731–735

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singletary SE, Alfred C, Ashley P (2002) Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:3628–3636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tavassoli FA (2008) Lobular and ductal intraepithelial neopla-sia. Pathologe 29(2): 107–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thill M, Kapsimalakou S, Diedrich K, Baumann K (2012) Behandlung des duktalen Carcinoma in situ. Gynäkologe 45: 269–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tran NV, Chang DW, Gupta A, Kroll SS, Robb GL (2001) Comparison of immediate and delayed free TRAM flap breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 108(1): 78–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Untch M, Gerber B, Möbus V et al. (2011) Zürich consensus statement of German experts on St. Gallen conference 2011 on breast cancer (Zürich 2011). Geburtsh Frauenheilkd 71:381–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Veronesi U, Rilke F, Luini A, Sacchini V, Galimberti V, Campa T (1987) Distribution of axillary node metastases by level of invasion. Cancer 59:682–687

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Veronesi U, Banfi A, Salvadori B, Luini A (1990) Breast conservation is the treatment of choice in small breast cancer: long-term results of a randomiszed trial. Eur J Cancer 26:668–670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G (1999) Sentinel lymph node and axillary dissection in breast cancer: results in a large series. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:368–373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Voogd AC, Nielsen M, Peterse JL et al. (2001) Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. Differences in risk factors for local and distant recurrence of breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy for stage I and II breast cancer: pooled results of two large European randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 19:1688–1697

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wittekind C, Meyer H-J (Hrsg) (2010) TNM-Klassifikation maligner Tumoren, 7. Aufl. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fürst-Stirum-Klinik (FSK) Bruchsal, Frauenklinik, Gutleutstraße 1–14, 76646, Bruchsal

    Prof. Dr. med. Jürgen Wacker

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. med. Jürgen Wacker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fürst-Stirum-Klinik Bruchsal, Frauenklinik, Gutleutstraße 1–14, 76646, Bruchsal

    Jürgen Wacker

  2. Praxisklinik am Rosengarten, Augustaanlage 7–11, 68165, Mannheim

    Martin Sillem

  3. Praxisklinik am Rosengarten, Augustaanlage 7–11, 68165, Mannheim

    Gunther Bastert

  4. Universitätsklinikum Erlangen-Nürnberg, Frauenklinik, Universitätsstraße 21–23, 91054, Erlangen

    Matthias W. Beckmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wacker, J. (2013). Maligne Tumoren der Mamma. In: Wacker, J., Sillem, M., Bastert, G., Beckmann, M. (eds) Therapiehandbuch Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30189-6_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30189-6_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30188-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30189-6

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation