Skip to main content
  • 4978 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Früherkennung in der Onkologie hat zum Ziel, eine onkologische Erkrankung so frühzeitig zu erkennen, dass sie noch dauerhaft geheilt werden kann. Früherkennung des Mammakarzinoms wendet sich an apparent gesunde (asymptomatische) Frauen, von denen nur eine geringe Zahl unerkannt erkrankt ist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Andersson I, Sigfusson BF (1987) Screening for breast cancer in Malmo: a randomized trial. Recent Results Cancer Res 105:62–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard-Barbash R, Klabunde C, Paci E et al. (1999) Breast cancer screening in 21 countries: delivery of services, notification of results and outcomes ascertainment. Eur J Cancer Prev 8(5): 417–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter N (2001) Preventive health care, 2001 update: should women be routinely taught breast self-examination to screen for breast cancer? CMAJ 164(13): 1837–1846

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beam CA, Sullivan DC, Layde PM (1996) Effect of human variability on independent double reading in screening mammography. Acad Radiol Nov 3(11): 891–897

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berg WA (2003) Rationale for a trial of screening breast ultrasound: American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6666. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(5): 1225–1228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bjurstam N, Bjorneld L, Warwick J et al. (2003) The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial. Cancer 97(10): 2387–2396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanks RG, Wallis MG, Moss SM (1998) A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme. J Med Screen 5(4): 195–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Botha JL, Bray F, Sankila R, Parkin DM (2003) Breast cancer incidence and mortality trends in 16 European countries. Eur J Cancer 39(12): 1718–1729

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buchberger W, Niehoff A, Obrist P, Koekkoek-Doll P, Dunser M (2000) Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 21(4): 325–336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans AJ, Pinder SE, Ellis IO, Wilson AR (2001) Screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): overdiagnosis or an obligate precursor of invasive disease? J Med Screen 8(3): 149–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher SW (1997) Breast cancer screening among women in their forties: an overview of the issues. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 22:5–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL (1995) Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. A retrospective review. Cancer 76(4): 626–630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hellquist BN, Duffy SW, Abdsaleh S, Björneld L, Bordas P, Tabar L, Vitak B, Zackrisson S, Nyström L, Jonsson H (2010) Effectiveness of population-based service screening with mammography for women ages 40 to 49 years: evaluation of the Swedish Mammography Screening in Young Women (SCRY) cohort. Cancer 117(4): 714–722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Bick U, Bradley WG jr et al. (2001) International investigation of breast MRI: results of a multicentre study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters for contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathologically correlated lesions. Eur Radiol 11(4): 531–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Junkermann H, Becker N, Peitgen HO (2001) Konzept und Durchführung der Modellprojekte in Deutschland. Radiologe 41(4): 328–336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knopp MV, Weiss E, Sinn HP et al. (1999) Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 10(3): 260–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (1998) Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: Detection with screening ultrasounddiagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 207:191–199

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C et al. (2004) Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 351(5): 427–437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl C, Weigel S, Schrading S, Arand B, Bieling H, König R, Tombach B, Leutner C, Rieber-Brambs A, Nordhoff D, Heindel W, Reiser M, Schild HH (2010) Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial. J Clin Oncol 28(9): 1450–1457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC et al. (2000) Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology 215(1): 267–279

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Law J, Faulkner K (2001) Cancers detected and induced, and associated risk and benefit, in a breast screening programme. Br J Radiol 74(888): 1121–1127

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Law J, Faulkner K (2002) Concerning the relationship between benefit and radiation risk, and cancers detected and induced, in a breast screening programme. Br J Radiol 75(896): 678–684

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelblatt J, Saha S, Teutsch S et al. (2003) The cost-effectiveness of screening mammography beyond age 65 years: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 139(10): 835–842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moss S (2004) Should women under 50 be screened for breast cancer? Br J Cancer 91(3): 413–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paci E, Warwick J, Falini P, Duffy SW (2004) Overdiagnosis in screening: is the increase in breast cancer incidence rates a cause for concern? J Med Screen 11(1): 23–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perry N, Broeders M, Wolf C de, Törnberg S (eds) (2003) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening, 3rd edn. European C, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosselli DT, Paci E (1993) Mammography and overdiagnosis. Ann Oncol 4(1): 9–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Sardanelli F, Podo F, Santoro F et al.; for the High Breast Cancer Risk Italian 1 (HIBCRIT-1) Study. Multicenter surveillance of women at high genetic breast cancer risk using mammography, ultrasonography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (the high breast cancer risk italian 1 study): final results. Invest Radiol 44(2): 94–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Semiglazov VF, Manikhas AG, Moiseenko VM et al. (2003) Results of a prospective randomized investigation [Russia (St.Petersburg)/WHO] to evaluate the significance of selfexamination for the early detection of breast cancer. Vopr Onkol 49(4): 434–441

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabar L, Fagerberg CJ, Gad A et al. (1985) Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1(8433): 829–832

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Duffy SW, Day NE, Gad A, Grontoft O (1992) Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am Jan 30(1): 187–210

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teh W, Wilson AR (1998) The role of ultrasound in breast cancer screening. A consensus statement by the European Group for Breast Cancer Screening. Eur J Cancer 34(4): 449–450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DB, Gao DL, Ray RM et al. (2002) Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: final results. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(19): 1445–1457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vainio H, Bianchini F (2002) IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. Vol. 7: Breast cancer screening. lARCPress, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoor G van, Moss SM, Otten JD, Donders R, Paap E, den Heeten GJ, Holland R, Broeders MJ, Verbeek AL (2010) Effective biennial mammographic screening in women aged 40–49. Eur J Cancer 46(18): 3137–3140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zahl PH, Strand BH, Maehlen J (2004) Incidence of breast cancer in Norway and Sweden during introduction of nationwide screening: prospective cohort study. Br Med J 328(7445): 921–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Junkermann, H. (2013). Früherkennung des Mammakarzinoms. In: Wacker, J., Sillem, M., Bastert, G., Beckmann, M. (eds) Therapiehandbuch Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30189-6_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30189-6_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30188-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30189-6

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics