Advertisement

Annäherungs- und Vermeidungsmotivation

  • Veronika Brandstätter
  • Julia Schüler
  • Rosa Maria Puca
  • Ljubica Lozo
Part of the Springer-Lehrbuch book series (SLB)

Zusammenfassung

Die Frage nach grundlegenden, evolutionsbiologisch fundierten Beweggründen für menschliches Verhalten lässt sich am besten durch eine zweite Frage, nämlich die, was Lebewesen auf unterschiedlichen phylogenetischen Entwicklungsstufen gemeinsam ist, beantworten. Die elementarsten Reaktionen, die Organismen auf ihre Umwelt zeigen, sind sich auf einen positiven Stimulus zuzubewegen oder sich von einem negativen schädigenden Stimulus wegzubewegen.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Weiterführende Literatur

  1. Elliot, A. J. (2008). Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Literatur

  1. Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horseman of automaticity. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of Social Cognition (pp. 1–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cacioppo, J. T., Priester, J. R., & Berntson, G. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 5–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davidson, R. J., Schwartz, G. E., Saron, C., Bennett, J., & Goleman, D. J. (1979). Frontal versus parietal EEG asymmetry during positive and negative affect. Psychophysiology, 16, 202–203.Google Scholar
  5. Ebner, N. C., Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2006). Developmental changes in personal goal orientation from young to late adulthood: From striving for gains to maintenance and prevention of losses. Psychology and Aging, 21, 664–678.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elliot, A. J., Maier, M. A., Moller, A. C., Friedman, R., & Meinhardt, J. (2007). Color and psychological functioning: The effect of red on performance attainment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(1),154–168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2010). Approach and avoidance temperaments as basic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality, 78(3), 865–906.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frank, E., & Brandstätter, V. (2002). Approach versus avoidance: Different types of commitment in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(2), 208–221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Freud, S. (1915/1952). Triebe und Triebschicksale (GW, Bd. X), Frankfurt: Fischer.Google Scholar
  12. Freund, A. M. (2006). Differential motivational consequences of goal focus in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 21, 240–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gable, S. (2006). Approach and avoidance social motives. Journal of Personality, 74(1), 175–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gray, J. A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gray, J. A. (1987). The psychology of fear and stress (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217–1230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Henry Holt & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw–Hill.Google Scholar
  20. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rheinberg, F. (2008). Motivation. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  22. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: The role of genetics and adaptation. Journal of Personality, 58, 17–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1993). Behavioral inhibition versus constraint: A dispositional perspective. In D. Wegner & J. Pennebaker (Eds.), Handbook of mental control (pp. 506–527). New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  24. Werth, L., & Förster, J. (2007). Regulatorischer Fokus. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 38(1), 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wundt, W. (1887). Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie (3. Aufl.). Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Veronika Brandstätter
    • 1
  • Julia Schüler
    • 2
  • Rosa Maria Puca
    • 3
  • Ljubica Lozo
    • 4
  1. 1.Universität ZürichZürich
  2. 2.Universität BernBern
  3. 3.Universität OsnabrückOsnabrück
  4. 4.Universität WürzburgWürzburg

Personalised recommendations