Abstract
As it has been well established in previous chapters, when implementing the Prisoner’s Dilemma (PD) game on top of complex networks, the scale-free (SF) topologies greatly enhance cooperation [1–12], compared to other topologies as ER networks. It is also well known that the heterogeneity on the degree distribution of these structures is a crucial factor in order to achieve such high levels of cooperation in the system. More specifically, the hubs, or nodes with the highest connectivity, act always as cooperators, surrounding themselves with middle-class cooperators, and creating a unique cluster (or ‘Eden’) of cooperation that is able to resist the attack of defectors, even when cooperation gets really expensive. Nonetheless, up to now we have only focused on the BA model [13], among other SF network models available in literature (for a quick review of some of them, see [14, 15]). BA SF networks have some correlations by construction, the so-called age-correlations [16, 17, 18]. That means that older nodes, the ones that arrived earlier to the system when it was being built are interconnected, since they formed the original core of nodes, and besides, these older nodes usually become hubs as the network grows. The existence of age-correlations can be found in some real systems also, such as the collaboration or citation networks, or the ’old boy’ network, made up of former students of the Ivy League that now work at the top investment banks [19].
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
F. C. Santos and J. M. Pacheco, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 098104 (2005).
F. C. Santos, F. J. Rodrigues, and J. M. Pacheco, Proc. Biol. Sci. 273, 51 (2006).
F. C. Santos and J. M. Pacheco, J. Evol. Biol. 19, 726 (2006).
F. C. Santos, J. M. Pacheco, and T. Lenaerts, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 3490 (2006).
H. Ohtsuki, E. L. C. Hauert, and M. A. Nowak, Nature 441, 502 (2006).
G. Abramson and M. Kuperman, Phys. Rev. E 63, 030901(R) (2001).
V. M. Eguíluz, M. G. Zimmermann, C. J. Cela-Conde, and M. San Miguel, American Journal of Sociology 110, 977 (2005).
T. Killingback and M. Doebeli, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 263, 1135 (1996).
G. Szabó and G. Fő¡th, Phys. Rep. 446, 97 (2007).
A. Szolnoki, M. Perc, and Z. Danku, Physica A 387, 2075 (2008).
J. Vukov and G. S. A. Szolnoki, Phys. Rev. E 77, 026109 (2008).
J. Gómez-Gardeñes, M. Campillo, L. M. Floría, and Y. Moreno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 108103 (2007).
A. Barabási and R. Albert, Science 286, 509 (1999).
S. Boccaletti, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, M. Chavez, and D. Hwang, Phys. Rep. 424, 175 (2006).
G. Caldarelli, A. Capocci, P. D. L. Rios, and M. A. M. noz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 258702 (2002).
S. N. Dorogovtsev and J. F. F. Mendes, Evolution of networks. From biological nets to the Internet and the WWW. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2003).
M. Newman, SIAM Review 45, 167 (2003).
R. Albert and A. L. Barabási, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 47 (2002).
S. H. Strogatz, Nature 410, 268 (2001).
J. Hofbauer, P. Schuster, and K. Sigmund, J. Theor. Biol. 81, 609 (1979).
P. Taylor and L. Jonker, Math. Biosci. 40, 145 (1978).
H. Gintis, Game theory evolving. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2000).
H. Ohtsuki and M. A. Nowak, J. Theor. Biol. 243, 86 (2006).
S. Maslov and K. Sneppen, Science 296, 910 (2002).
M. Molloy and B. Reed, Combinatorics, Probability and Computing 7, 295 (1998).
K. Lindgren and M. Nordahl, Physica D 75, 292 (1994).
M. A. Nowak and R. M. May, Nature 359, 826 (1992).
C. Hauert and M. Doebeli, Nature 428, 643 (2004).
J. Hofbauer and K. Sigmund, Evolutionary games and population dynamics. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998).
J. Hofbauer and K. Sigmund, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 40, 479 (2003).
R. Pastor-Satorras and A. Vespignani., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3200 (2001).
R. Pastor-Satorras and A. Vespignani., Phys. Rev. E 63, 066117 (2001).
Y. Moreno, R. Pastor-Satorras, and A. Vespignani., European Physical Journal B 26, 521 (2002).
L. M. Floría, C. Gracia-Lá¡zaro, J. Gómez-Gardeñes, and Y. Moreno, Phys. Rev. E 79, 026106 (2009).
M. Nowak, Science 314, 1560 (2006).
S. Assenza, J. Gómez-Gardeñes, and V. Latora, Phys. Rev. E 78, 017101 (2008).
A. Pusch, S. Weber, and M. Porto, Phys. Rev. E 77, 036120 (2008).
L. Costa, F. A. Rodrigues, G. Travieso, and P. R. V. Boas., Advances in Physics 56, 167 (2007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Poncela Casasnovas, J. (2012). The Prisoner’s Dilemma Game on Random Scale-Free Networks. In: Evolutionary Games in Complex Topologies. Springer Theses. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30117-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30117-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30116-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30117-9
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)