Skip to main content

Writing IS Research Articles

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Scientific Research in Information Systems

Part of the book series: Progress in IS ((PROIS))

  • 5637 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we will examine some guidelines and advice that relate to reporting of research conducted. Publication is an essential scholarly activity because it informs academic and other communities about lines of investigation, (and their outcomes) related to relevant phenomenon being studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bem, D.J.: Writing the Empirical Journal Article. In: Darley, J.M., Zanna, M.P., Roediger III, H.L. (eds.) The compleat academic: A practical guide for the beginning social scientist, 2nd edn, pp. 185–219. American Psychological Association, Washington (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bergh, D.D.: From the editors: Thinking strategically about contribution. Acad. Manag. J. 46, 135–136 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Daft, R.L.: Why I recommended that your manuscript be rejected and what you can do about it. In: Cummings, L.L., Frost, P.J. (eds.) Publishing in the organizational sciences, 2nd edn, pp. 164–182. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Dean, D.L., Lowry, P.B., Humpherys, S.L.: Profiling the research productivity of Tenured Information Systems Faculty at U.S. Institutions. MIS Q. 35, 1–15 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feldman, D.C.: The devil is in the details: Converting good research into publishable articles. J. Manag. 30, 1–6 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hardaway, D.E., Scamell, R.W.: Open knowledge creation: Bringing transparency and inclusiveness to the peer review process. MIS Q. 36, (2012, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hargittai, E.: Research confidential: Solutions to problems most social scientists pretend they never have. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kane, G.C., Fichman, R.G.: The Shoemaker’s children: Using Wikis for information systems teaching, research, and publication. MIS Q. 33, 1–17 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lagendijk, A.: Survival guide for scientists: Writing - presentation - email, 3rd edn. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, A.S.: Reviewing a manuscript for publication. J. Oper. Manag. 13, 87–92 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lyytinen, K., Baskerville, R., Iivari, J., Te'Eni, D.: Why the old world cannot publish? overcoming challenges in publishing high-impact IS research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 16, 317–326 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Recker, J.: Continued use of process modeling grammars: The impact of individual difference factors. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 76–92 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Recker, J.: Explaining usage of process modeling grammars: Comparing three theoretical models in the study of two grammars. Inf. Manag. 47, 316–324 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Recker, J., Indulska, M., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: The ontological deficiencies of process modeling in practice. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 501–525 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Green, P., Indulska, M.: Do ontological deficiencies in modeling grammars matter? MIS Q. 35, 57–79 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rynes, S.: From the editors: Some reflections on contribution. Acad. Manag. J. 45, 311–313 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schminke, M.: From the editors: Raising the bamboo curtain. Acad. Manag. J. 17, 310–314 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sørensen, C.: This is not an article. Just some thoughts on how to write one. Available at: mobility.lse.ac.uk/download/Sorensen2005b.pdf (2005)

  19. Starbuck, W.H.: Fussy professor Starbuck’s cookbook of Handy-Dandy prescriptions for ambitious academic authors or why I hate passive verbs and Love My Word processor. Available at: (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Straub, D.W.: Editor’s comments: Creating blue oceans of thought via highly citable articles. MIS Q. 33, iii–vii (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Straub, D.W.: Editor’s comments: Why top journals accept your paper. MIS Q. 33, iii–x (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Venkatesh, V.: Road to success: A guide for doctoral students and junior faculty members in the behavioral and social sciences. Dog Ear Publishin, Indianapolis (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Watson, R.T.: Introducing MISQ review - A new department in MIS Quarterly. MIS Q. 25, 103–106 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weber, R.: Editor’s comments: Theoretically speaking. MIS Q. 27, iii–xii (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Q. 26, xiii–xxiii (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Whetten, D.A.: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad. Manag. Rev. 14, 490–495 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wilkinson, A.M.: The scientist’s handbook for writing papers and dissertations. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Newell, A. and H.A. Simon, Human Problem Solving 1972, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Treisman, A.M. and G. Gelade, A Feature-Integration Theory of Attention. Cognitive Psychology, 1980. 12(1): p. 97–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Larkin, J.H. and H.A. Simon, Why a Diagram Is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words. Cognitive Science, 1987. 11(1): p. 65–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Petre, M., Why Looking Isn't Always Seeing: Readership Skills and Graphical Programming. Communications of the ACM, 1995. 38(6): p. 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Recker, J. (2012). Writing IS Research Articles. In: Scientific Research in Information Systems. Progress in IS. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30048-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics