Abstract
This paper aims to discuss four versions of the thesis of models as representations that are used to deal with the problem of scientific representation: models as structures, analogs, fictions, and mental representations. In particular, the paper focuses on an examination of the problems for the thesis of models as structure and shows that (i) structure cannot be viewed as the essence of models; (ii) isomorphism cannot define a representational relation; and (iii) models involve linguistic descriptions instead of pure abstract mathematical entities. Based on the conception of models as mental representations, the paper suggests a naturalist approach to scientific representation and a reduction of the problem of scientific representation into the problem of mental representation, by which the representational role of models in science may be explained by means of the representational function of mental representations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bogen, J., Woodward, J.: Saving the phenomena. The Philosophical Review 97, 303–352 (1988)
French, S.: Keeping quiet on the ontology of models. Synthese 172, 231–249 (2010)
Frigg, R.: Fiction and scientific representation. In: Frigg, R., Hunter, M.C. (eds.) Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science, pp. 97–138. Springer, Berlin and New York (2010)
Giere, R.N.: Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1988)
Giere, R.N.: How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science 71, 742–752 (2004)
Giere, R.N.: An agent-based conception of models and scientific representation. Synthese 172, 269–281 (2010)
Gooding, D.C.: Cognition, construction and culture: Visual theories in the sciences. Journal of Cognition and Culture 4, 551–593 (2004)
Gooding, D.C.: Seeing the forest for the trees: Visualization, cognition, and scientific inference. In: Gorman, M.E., et al. (eds.) Scientific and Technological Thinking, pp. 173–217. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2005)
Gooding, D.C.: Visualizing scientific inference. Topics in Cognitive Science 2, 15–35 (2010)
Goodman, N.: Seven strictures on similarity. In: Goodman, N. (ed.) Problems and Projects, pp. 437–446. Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis and New York (1972)
Johnson-Laird, P.N.: Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1983)
Magnani, L.: Model-based and manipulative abduction in science. Foundations of Science 9, 219–247 (2004a)
Magnani, L.: Reasoning through doing. Epistemic mediators in scientific discovery. Journal of Applied Logic 2, 439–450 (2004b)
Mundy, B.: On the general theory of meaningful representation. Synthese 67, 391–437 (1986)
Nagel, E.: The Structure of Science. Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. Harcourt, Brace and World, New York (1961)
Nersessian, N.J.: The cognitive basis of model-based reasoning in science. In: Carruthers, P., Stich, S., Siegal, M. (eds.) Cognitive Models of Science, pp. 133–153. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002a)
Nersessian, N.J.: Maxwell and “the method of physical analogy”: model-based reasoning, generic abstraction, and conceptual change. In: Malament, D. (ed.) Essay in the History and Philosophy of Science and Mathematics, pp. 129–166. Open Court, Chicago and La Salle (2002b)
Quine, W.V.: On what there is. The Review of Metaphysics 2, 21–38 (1948)
Simon, H.A.: The axiomatization of classical mechanics. Philosophy of Science 21, 340–343 (1954)
Suppes, P.: A comparison of the meaning and uses of models in mathematics and the empirical sciences. Synthese 12, 287–301 (1960)
Suppes, P.: Representation and Invariance of Scientific Structures. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2002)
Tweney, R.D.: Mathematical representations in science: A cognitive–historical case history. Topics in Cognitive Science 1, 758–776 (2009)
Tweney, R.D.: Representing the electromagnetic field: How Maxwell’s mathematics empowered Faraday’s field theory. Science & Education 20, 687–700 (2011)
Tweney, R.D.: On the unreasonable reasonableness of mathematical physics: A cognitive view. In: Proctor, R.W., Capaldi, E.J. (eds.) Psychology of Science: Implicit and Explicit Processes (to appear) (forthcoming)
van Fraassen, B.C.: The Scientific Image. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1980)
van Fraassen, B.C.: Structure and perspective: Philosophical perplexity and paradox. In: Dalla Chiara, M.L., et al. (eds.) Logic and Scientific Methods, pp. 511–530. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1997)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Li, D., Li, P. (2012). An Examination of the Thesis of Models as Representations. In: Magnani, L., Li, P. (eds) Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29928-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29928-5_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29927-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29928-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)