Skip to main content

Geometric-Semantical Consistency Validation of CityGML Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Progress and New Trends in 3D Geoinformation Sciences

Abstract

In many domains, data quality is recognized as a key factor for successful business and quality management is a mandatory process in the production chain. Automated domain-specific tools are widely used for validation of business-critical data. Although the workflow for 3D city models is well-established from data acquisition to processing, analysis and visualization, quality management is not yet a standard during this workflow. Erroneous results and application defects are among the consequences of processing data with unclear specification. We show that this problem persists even if data are standard compliant and develop systematic rules for the validation of geometric-semantical consistency. A test implementation of the rule set and validation results of real-world city models are presented to demonstrate the potential of the approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Strategic Automotive Data Standards Industry Group—Product Data Quality.

  2. 2.

    SIG-3D—GDI-DE; Special Interest Group 3D of the Geo Data Infrastructure Germany.

  3. 3.

    Working Group of the surveying agencies of the federal states.

References

  • Attene M, Falcidieno B (2006) Remesh: an nteractive environment to edit and repair triangle meshes. In: IEEE international conference on shape modeling and applications. p 41

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdahn J, Coors V (2010) Towards an automated healingof 3D urban models. In Kolbe TH, König G, Nagel C (eds) In: Proceedings of international conference on 3D geoinformation. International archives of photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information science. International conference on 3D geoinformation. Shaker Verlag, Aachen, Germany, pp 13–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Boguslawski P, Gold C, Ledoux H (2011) Modelling and analysing 3D buildings with a primal/dual data structure. ISPRS J Photogram Rem Sens 66(2):188–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borodin P, Novotni M, Klein R (2002) Progressive gap closing for mesh repairing. In: Vince J, Earnshaw R (eds) Advances in modelling, animation and rendering, Springer pp 201–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Butlin G, Stops C (1996) CAD data repair In: 5th international meshing roundtable. pp 7-12

    Google Scholar 

  • Coors V, Krämer M (2011) Integrating quality management into a 3D geospatial server. In: UDMS 2011. Urban Data Management Society. Delft, p 8

    Google Scholar 

  • CPA-Systems GmbH (2011) Available at: http://www.cpa-systems.de/

  • Elysium (2008) CADdoctor. Available at: http://www.elysiuminc.com/Products/caddoctor.asp. Accessed 20 Jan, 2012

  • Ghawana T, Zlatanova S (2010) Data consistency checks for building a 3D model: a case study of Technical University, Delft campus. Geospatial World, The Netherlands, p 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Gröger G, Coors V(2010) Rules for validating GML geometries in CityGML. Available at: http://files.sig3d.de/file/20101215_Regeln_GML_final_DE.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2012

  • Gröger G, Plümer L (2009) How to achieve consistency for 3D city models. GeoInformatica 15(1):137–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gröger, G. et al (eds) (2008) OpenGIS city geography markup language (CityGML) encoding standard. Available at: http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=28802. Accessed 28 June 2011

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2002) ISO 19113 standard: geographic information -- quality principles. Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=26018

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2003a) ISO 19114 standard: geographic information—quality evaluation procedures. Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=26019

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2003b) ISO/CD 19107, Geographic information—spatial schema

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2006) ISO/PAS 26183—SASIG product data quality guidelines for the global automotive industry

    Google Scholar 

  • International TechneGroup (2011) CADfix. Available at: http://www.transcendata.com/products/cadfix/index.htm

  • Ju T (2009) Fixing geometric errors on polygonal models: a survey. J Comput Sci Technol 24(1):19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karki S, Thompson R, McDougall K (2010) Data validation in a 3D cadastre. In Neutens T, Maeyer P (eds) Developments in 3D geo-Iinformation sciences. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography, Springer, Berlin, pp 92–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazar BM et al (2008) On valid and invalid three-dimensional geometries. In: Oosterom P et al (eds) Advances in 3D geoinformation systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 19–46 (Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-3-540-72135-2_2. Accessed 22 June 2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ledoux H (2011) Topologically consistent 3D city models obtained by extrusion. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 25(4):557–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Métral C, Falquet G, Cutting-Decelle AF (2009) Towards semantically enriched 3D citymodels: an ontology-based approach. In: Academic track of geoweb 2009—cityscapes, international archives of photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences (ISPRS). Vancouver, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Object Management Group (2011) OMG object constraint language (OCL). Available at: http://www.omg.org/spec/OCL/2.3.1/. Accessed 20 Jan 2012

  • van Oort P (2005) Spatial data quality: from description to application. Optima Grafische Communicatie, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterom P, Quak W, Tilssen T (2005) About invalid, valid and clean polygons. In Fisher PF (ed) Developments in spatial data handling. 11th international symposium on spatial data handling. Leicester, UK: Springer, Berlin, pp 1–16. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26772-7_1

  • Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) (2011) Data quality DWG. Available at: http://www.opengeospatial.org/projects/groups/dqdwg. Accessed 19 Jan 2012

  • Pelagatti G et al. (2009) From the conceptual design of spatial constraints to their implementation in real systems. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems. Seattle, pp 448-451, Nov 4-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocchini C et al (2004) The marching intersections algorithm for merging range images. Vis Comput 20:149–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safe Software (2011). FME desktop. Available at: http://www.safe.com/inc/vendors/elqNow/elqRedir.htm?ref=http://downloads.safe.com/fme/brochures/FME_Desktop.pdf

  • SIG-3D Quality Working Group (2012) Modellierungshandbuch Gebäude. Available at: http://www.sig3d.de/index.php?catid=2&themaid=8777960

  • Stadler A, Kolbe TH (2007) Spatio-semantic coherence in the integration of 3D city models. In: Proceedings of the 5th inter-national symposium on spatial data quality. Enschede. Available at: http://spirit.bv.tu-berlin.de/igg/htdocs/fileadmin/user_upload/ Stadler/SDQ2007_Stadler_Kolbe.pdf

  • Thompson R, Oosterom P (2011) Modelling and validation of 3D cadastral objects. In: Zlatanova S et al (eds) Urban and regional data management–UDMS annual 2011. CRC Press, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Transcat PLM (2011) Q-Checker. Available at: http://www.transcat-plm.com/software/transcat-software/q-checker.html. (Accessed 24 Jan 2012

  • T-Systems International (2011) VALIDAT. Available at: https://servicenet.t-systems.de/validat. Accessed 24 Jan 2012

  • Wöhler T, Pries M, Stark R (2009) Effiziente Verfahren zur Aufbereitung von Geometriemodellen für die virtuelle Absicherung. In 3. Symposium Geometrisches Modellieren, Visualisieren und Bildverarbeitung. Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamakawa S, Shimada K (2009) Removing self intersections of a triangular mesh by edge swapping, edge hammering, and face lifting. In 18th international meshing roundtable

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the SIG-3D quality working group for fruitful discussion and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) for funding of the project CityDoctor under provision number 17110B10.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Detlev Wagner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wagner, D., Wewetzer, M., Bogdahn, J., Alam, N., Pries, M., Coors, V. (2013). Geometric-Semantical Consistency Validation of CityGML Models. In: Pouliot, J., Daniel, S., Hubert, F., Zamyadi, A. (eds) Progress and New Trends in 3D Geoinformation Sciences. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29793-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics