Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sicherheit, Akzeptanz und Anwendermerkmale

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Natürliche Familienplanung heute

  • 4436 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Das allgemeine Vorurteil der mangelnden Sicherheit der Natürlichen Familienplanung ist nicht unbegründet: Viele Frauen sind mit „natürlicher Verhütung“ unbeabsichtigt schwanger geworden. Näher nachforschend stellt man fest, dass die Formen und Möglichkeiten „natürlich zu verhüten“ unzählig sind: Coitus interruptus , eine Rechnung „pi mal Daumen“, sich Verlassen auf den Mittelschmerz oder vage und völlig unzureichende Informationen zu einzelnen Methoden aus Zeitschriftenartikeln bzw. von einer Freundin. All das wird unter dem Namen „Natürliche Familienplanung“ verstanden und ist denkbar unsicher. In einer repräsentativen Umfrage von Oddens zur Anwendung von Familienplanungsmethoden wurde unter dem Oberbegriff NFP neben der völlig obsoleten Kalendermethode sogar der Coitus interruptus aufgezählt, die symptothermale Methode dagegen nicht. Kein Wunder, dass nach diesen Umfrageergebnissen eine von drei Frauen „mit NFP“ schwanger wurde [50].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. The European Natural Family Planning Study Groups (1993) Prospective European multi-center study of natural family planning (1989-1992): interim results. Adv Contracept 9: 269-83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. The European Natural Family Planning Study Groups (1999) European multicenter study of natural family planning (1989-1995): efficacy and drop-out. Adv Contracept 15: 69-83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arbeitsgruppe NFP (1988) Natürliche Methoden der Familienplanung. Schriftenreihe des Bundesministeriums für Jugend, Familie, Frauen und Gesundheit. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, Berlin, Köln

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ball M (1976) A prospective field trial of the „ovulation method“ of avoiding conception. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 6: 63-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Barbato M, Bertolotti G (1988) Natural methods for fertility control: a prospective study – First Part. Int J Fertil (Suppl) 33: 48-51

    Google Scholar 

  6. Borkman T (1979) A social science perspective of research issues for natural family planning. Int Rev NFP 3: 331-55

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boys GA (1989) Natural family planning and the couple relationship: A nationwide survey. Diocesan Development Program for Natural Family Planning, Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bremme J (1991) Sexualverhalten und Konzeptionswahrscheinlichkeit. Med Dissertation, Universität Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dame W (1975) Der Pearl-Index. In: Beller F, Böttcher H (eds) Moderne Kontrazeption. Thieme, Stuttgart, S 3-5

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Irala J, Lopez dB, de Fez CM, Arredondo J, Mikolajczyk RT, Stanford JB (2007) Women’s attitudes towards mechanisms of action of family planning methods: survey in primary health centres in Pamplona, Spain. BMC, Womens Health 7:10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. De-Leizaola-Cordonnier A (1995) Natural family planning effectiveness in Belgium. Adv Contracept 11: 165-72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dennerstein L, Gotts G, Brown JB, Morse CA, Farley TM, Pinol A (1994) The relationship between the menstrual cycle and female sexual interest in women with PMS complaints and volunteers. Psychoneuroendocrinology 19:293-304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dominik R, Trussell J, Walsh T (1999) Failure rates among perfect users and during perfect use: a distinction that matters. Contraception 60: 315-20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Döring G (1967) Über die Zuverlässigkeit der Temperaturmethode zur Empfängnisverhütung. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 92: 1055-61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Döring G, Sollfrank R (1988) Wann die Liebe am schönsten ist. Gibt es ein eindeutiges Libidomaximun im Zyklus der Frau? Sexualmedizin 17: 813

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ecochard R, Pinguet F, Ecochard I, De Gouvello R, Guy M, Huy F (1998) Analysis of natural family planning failures in 7007 cycles of use. Contracept Fertil Sex 26: 291-6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fehring RJ, Lawrence D, Philpot C (1994) Use effectiveness of the Creighton model ovulation method of natural family planning. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 23: 303-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. vonFragstein M, Flynn A, Royston P (1988) Analysis of a representative sample of natural family planning users in England and Wales 1984-1985. Int J Fertil 33 (Suppl): 70-7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. France M, France J, Townend K (1997) Natural family planning in New Zealand: a study of continuation rates and characteristics of users. Adv Contracept 13: 191-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Frank-Herrmann P, Freundl G, Baur S, Bremme M, Doring GK, Godehardt E et al. (1991) Effectiveness and acceptibility of the symptothermal method of natural family planning in Germany. Am J Obstet Gynecol 165: 2052-4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Frank-Herrmann P, Freundl G, Gnoth C, Godehardt E, Kunert J, Baur S et al. (1997) Natural family planning with and without barrier method use in the fertile phase: efficacy in relation to sexual behavior: a German prospective long-term study. Adv Contracept 13: 179-89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Frank-Herrmann P, Heil J, Gnoth C, Toledo E, Baur S, Pyper C et al. (2007) The effectiveness of a fertility awareness based method to avoid pregnancy in relation to a couple’s sexual behaviour during the fertile time: a prospective longitudinal study. Hum Reprod 22: 1310-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Freundl G (2010) Efficacy of natural family planning methods. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 15:380-81]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Freundl G, Baur S, Bremme M, Döring G (1991) Natürliche Familienplanung: Neue Technologien und Studien zur Methode. BMJFG

    Google Scholar 

  25. Freundl G, Frank-Herrmann P, Raith-Paula E (1998) Natürliche Familienplanung. Gynäkologe 31: 398-409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gnoth C, Frank-Herrmann P., Freundl G, Kunert J, Godehardt E (1995) Sexual behavior of natural family planning users in Germany and its changes over time. Adv Contracept 11: 173-85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Göttlicher S (2009) Warum der Pearl-Index veraltert ist. ProPraxis Gynäkologie 3:10-11

    Google Scholar 

  28. Grimes DA, Gallo MF, Grigorieva V, Nanda K, Schulz KF (2004) Fertility awareness-based methods for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD004860

    Google Scholar 

  29. Harvey SM (1987) Female sexual behavior: fluctuations during the menstrual cycle. J Psychosom Res 31: 101-10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Heil J (2005) Diskussion von Effektivitätsstudien verschiedener Methoden der Natürlichen Familienplanung im Hinblick auf deren Gebrauch als Kontrazeptionsmethode sowie Analyse einer prospektiven Langzeit-Kohortenstudie zur symptothermalen Methode der Natürlichen Familienplanung. Med Dissertation, Universität Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  31. Herrmann H (1991) Unbeabsichtigte Schwangerschaften bei Anwendung der symptothermalen Methode der Natürlichen Familienplanung (NFP) in verschiedenen Lebenssituationen. Med Dissertation, Universität Düsseldorf

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hilgers TW, Stanford JB (1998) Creighton Model NaPro-Education Technology for avoiding pregnancy. Use effectiveness. J Reprod Med 43: 495-502

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Howard MP, Stanford JB (1999) Pregnancy probabilities during use of the Creighton Model Fertility Care System. Arch Fam Med 8: 391-402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Jain AK, Sivin I (1977) Life-Table analysis of IUDs: problems and recommendations. Stud FamPlann 8: 25-47

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Johnston JA, Roberts D, Spencer R (1978) NFP services and methods in Australia: A survey evaluation. Part 2: Clients Part 3: Clinics and teachers. IRNFP 2: 203-24

    Google Scholar 

  36. Johnston JA, Roberts D, Spencer R. (1978) NFP services and methods in Australia: A survey evaluation. Part 4: Methods of NFP. IRNFP 2: 328-53

    Google Scholar 

  37. Johnston JA, Roberts D, Spencer R (1978) NFP services and methods in Australia: A survey evaluation. Synopsis. IRNFP 2:143-54

    Google Scholar 

  38. Johnston J (1981) An analysis of continuity and discontinuity in natural family planning. An australian factor analysis. Int J Fert 26: 231-8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kambic R, Kambic M, Brixius AM, Miller S (1981) A thirty month clinical experience in natural family planning. Am J Public Health 71: 1255-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Klann N, Frank-Herrmann P, Sottong U (1993) Auswirkungen einer Natürlichen Familienplanung: Wie verändern sich Sexualverhalten und Partnerschaft? Sexualmedizin 22: 384-6

    Google Scholar 

  41. Klann N, Hahlweg K, Frank-Herrmann P, Sottong U, Hank G (1988) Natürlich verhüten – gibt es Kriterien für den Erfolg eines Paares? Sexualmedizin 11: 636-40

    Google Scholar 

  42. Klann N, Hahlweg K, Hank G (1988) Psychological aspects of NFP practice. Int J Fertil 33 (Suppl): 1990

    Google Scholar 

  43. Klaus H, Goebel JM, Muraski B, Egizio MT, Weitzel D, Taylor RS et al (1979) Use-effectiveness and client satisfaction in six centers teaching the Billings Ovulation Method. Contraception 19: 613-29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Labbok MH, Klaus H, Perez A (1991) Efficacy studies in natural family planning: issues and management implications illustrated with data from five studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 165: 2048-51

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Lamprecht V, Trussell J (1997) Natural family planning effectiveness: evaluating published reports. Adv Contracept 13: 155-65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Lienert M (1991) Die Bestimmung der fruchtbaren Zeit bei Anwendung der symptothermalen NFP-Methode, Fehler und Unsicherheiten. Med Dissertation, Universität Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Marshall J (1968) A field trial of the basal-body-temperature method of regulating births. Lancet 2: 8-10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Meuwissen I, Over R (1992) Sexual arousal across phases of the human menstrual cycle. Arch Sex Behav 21: 101-19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Mikolajczyk R, Rauchfuss M, Lamm D (2001) Zum Problem der ungeplanten Schwangerschaften in einer hoch entwickelten Gesellschaft – Modellstudie auf einer Wochenstation in Berlin. Zentralbl Gynakol 123: 578-84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Oddens BJ (1999) Women’s satisfaction with birth control: a population survey of physical and psychological effects of oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, condoms, natural family planning, and sterilization among 1466 women. Contraception 59: 277-86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Pearl R (1933) Factors in human fertility and their statistical evaluation. Lancet II: 607-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Pillsworth EG, Haselton MG, Buss DM (2004) Ovulatory shifts in female sexual desire. J Sex Res 41: 55-65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Potter RG, Sakoda JM, Feinberg WE (1968) Variable fecundability and the timing of births. Eugen Q 15: 155-63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Rice FJ, Lanctot CA, Garcia Devesa C (1981) The effectiveness of the symptothermal method of natural family planning: An international study. Int J Fertil 26: 222-30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Rötzer J (1968) Erweiterte Basaltemperaturmessung und Empfängnisregelung. Arch Gynäkol 206: 195-214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Rötzer J (1978) The symptothermal method: Ten years of change. Linacre Q 45: 358-74

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ryder N (1973) Contraceptive failure in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect 5: 133-42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Slob AK, Bax CM, Hop WC, Rowland DL, van der Werff ten Bosch JJ (1996) Sexual arousability and the menstrual cycle. Psychoneuroendocrinology 21: 545-58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Sollfrank R (1985) Libidoschwankungen im Menstruationszyklus. Ein kritischer Literaturquerschnitt. Med Dissertation, Universität München

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sottong U, Klann N, Fiederle X, Freundl G (1998) Natürliche Methoden fordern den Partner. Sexualmedizin 11: 133-44

    Google Scholar 

  61. Stanford JB, Lemaire JC, Thurman PB (1998) Woman’s interest in natural family planning. J Fam Pract 46: 65-71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Stanford JB, Hobbs R, Jameson P, DeWitt MJ, Fischer RC (2000) Defining dimensions of pregnancy intendedness. Matern Child Health J 4: 183-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Stanislaw H, Rice FJ (1988) Correlation between sexual desire and menstrual cycle characteristics. Arch Sex Behav 17: 499-508

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Tietze C, Lewitt S (1993) Recommended procedures for the study of use-effectiveness of contraceptive methods. IFFLP medical handbook Part I

    Google Scholar 

  65. Trussell J, Grummer-Strawn L (1990) Contraceptive failure of the ovulation method of periodic abstinence [see comments]. Fam Plann Perspect 22: 65-75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Trussell J, Gummer-Strawn L (1991) Further analysis of contraceptive failure of the ovulation method. Am J Obstet Gynecol 165: 205-45

    Google Scholar 

  67. Trussell J, Kost K (1987) Contraceptive failure in the United States: a critical review of the literature. Stud Fam Plann 18: 237-83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Van Steinvoorn R, Bruinink C (2010) Study to evaluate the long-term useoft he NFP-DAG method in The Netherlands. Eur J Contraception Reprod Health Care. 15, Suppl 1 (Book of Abstracts XIth ESC Congress) p.154

    Google Scholar 

  69. Vincent B (1967) Méthode thermiqueet contraception. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  70. Vollman R (1975) How effective is rhythm? Family Planning Perspectives 7: 53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Wallwiener CW, Wallwiener L-M, Seeger H, Mück AO, Bitzer J, Wallwiener M (2010) Prevalence of sexual dysfunction and impact of contraception in female German medical students. J Sex Med 7:2139-48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Wilcox AJ, Day-Baird D, Dunson DB, McConnaughey DR, Kesner JS, Weinberg CR (2004) On the frequency of intercourse around ovulation: evidence for biological influences. Hum Reprod 19: 1539-43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. World Health Organization (1981) A prospective multicentre trial of the ovulation method of natural family planning. I. The teaching phase. Fertil Steril 36: 152-8

    Google Scholar 

  74. World Health Organization (1981) A prospective multicentre trial of the ovulation method of natural family planning. II. The effectiveness phase. Fertil Steril 36: 591-8

    Google Scholar 

  75. Wade ME, McCarthy P, Abernathy JR, Harris GS, Danzer HC (1979) A randomized prospective study of the useeffectiveness of two methods of natural family planning: An interim report. Am J Obstet Gynecol 134: 628-634

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Wade ME, McCarthy P, Braunsten GD et al (1981) A randomized prospective study of the use-effectiveness of two methods of natural family planning. Am J Obstet Gynecol 141: 368-376

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rotwandstr. 14, 82178, Puchheim, Deutschland

    Dr. Elisabeth Raith-Paula

  2. Frauenklinik, Abt. Gyn. Endokrinologie und Fertilitätsstörungen, Universitätsfrauenklinik Heidelberg, Voßstraße 19, 69115, Heidelberg, Deutschland

    Dr. Petra Frank-Herrmann & Prof. Dr. Thomas Strowitzki

  3. Am Alten Rhein 9, 40593, Düsseldorf, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Günter Freundl

Authors
  1. Dr. Elisabeth Raith-Paula
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. Petra Frank-Herrmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Prof. Dr. Günter Freundl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Prof. Dr. Thomas Strowitzki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth Raith-Paula .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Raith-Paula, E., Frank-Herrmann, P., Freundl, G., Strowitzki, T. (2013). Sicherheit, Akzeptanz und Anwendermerkmale. In: Natürliche Familienplanung heute. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29784-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29784-7_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29783-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29784-7

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation