Abstract
A BCI enables a new communication channel that bypasses the standard neural pathways and output channels and in order to control an external device. BCI technology has been developed to enable lost body or communication functions in handicapped persons. Recently BCI systems are used for communication purposes, to control robotic devices to control games or for rehabilitation. This means BCI systems are not only built for user groups with special needs but also for healthy people. A limiting factor in the wide-spread application is the usage of abrasive gel and conductive paste to mount EEG electrodes. Therefore many research groups are now working on the practical usability of dry electrodes to completely avoid the usage of electrode gel. In this chapter results for endogenous and exogenous BCI approaches are presented and discussed based on the g.SAHARA dry electrode sensor concept. Raw EEG data, power spectra, the time course of evoked potentials, ERD/ERS values and BCI accuracy are compared for three BCI setups based on P300, SMR and SSVEP BCIs. Although the focus in this study was set to P300 evoked potentials it could be demonstrated that the used electrode concept works well for BCI based on P300, SMR and SSVEP BCI.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allison, B., Luth, T., Valbuena, D., Teymourian, A., Volosyak, I., Graser, A.: BCI demographics: How many (and what kinds of) people can use an SSVEP BCI? IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 18(2), 107–116 (2010)
Birbaumer, N., Ghanayim, N., Hinterberger, T., Iversen, I., Kotchoubey, B., Kubler, A., Perelmouter, J., Taub, E., Flor, H.: A spelling device for the paralysed. Nature 398, 297–298 (1999)
Blankertz, B., Losch, F., Krauledat, M., Dornhege, G., Curio, G., Muller, K.-R.: The Berlin brain–computer interface: Accurate performance from first-session in BCI-naive subjects. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 55(10), 2452–2462 (2008)
Cincotti, F., Kauhanen, L., Aloise, F., Palomaki, T., Caporusso, N., Jylanki, P., Babiloni, F., Vanacker, G., Nuttin, M., Marciani, M.G., Del, R.M., Mattia, D.: Preliminary experimentation on vibrotactile feedback in the context of mu-rhythm based BCI. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., 2007, pp. 4739–4742 (2007)
Donchin, E., Spencer, K.M., Wijesinghe, R.: The mental prosthesis: assessing the speed of a P300-based brain–computer interface. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 8, 174–179 (2000)
Edlinger, G., Holzner, C., Guger, C., Groenegress, C., Slater, M.: Brain–computer interfaces for goal orientated control of a virtual smart home environment. 4th International IEEE/EMBS conference on Neural Engineering. NER09, pp. 463–465 (2009)
Farwell, L.A., Donchin, E.: Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 70, 510–523 (1988)
Friman, O.: Multiple channel detection of steady-state visual evoked potentials for brain–computer interfaces. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 54(4), 742 (2007)
Gargiulo, G., Bifulco, P., Calvo, R.A., Cesarelli, M., Jin, C., van Schaik, A.A.: mobile EEG system with dry electrodes. IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference, pp. 273–276 (2008)
Grozea, C., Voinescu, C.D., Fazli, S.: Bristle-sensors-low-cost flexible passive dry EEG electrodes for neurofeedback and BCI applications. J. Neural Eng. 8(2), 025008 (2011)
Guger, C., Daban, S., Sellers, E., Holzner, C., Krausz, G., Carabalona, R., Gramatica, F., Edlinger, G.: How many people are able to control a P300-based brain–computer interface (BCI)? Neurosci. Lett. 462(1), 94–98 (2009)
Guger, C., Edlinger, G., Harkam, W., Niedermayer, I., Pfurtscheller, G.: How many people are able to operate an EEG-based brain–computer interface (BCI)? IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 11(2), 145–147 (2003)
Ko, W.H., Hynecek, J.: Dry electrodes and electrode amplifiers, In: Miller, H.A., Harrison, D.C. (eds.) Biomedical Electrode Technology, pp. 169–181. Academic Press, New York (1974)
Krusienski, D.J., Sellers, E.W., McFarland, D.J., Vaughan, T.M., Wolpaw, J.R.: Toward enhanced P300 speller performance. J. Neurosci. Methods 167, 15–21 (2008)
Leeb, R., Lee, F., Keinrath, C., Scherer, R., Bischof, H., Pfurtscheller, G.: Brain–computer communication: Motivation, aim, and impact of exploring a virtual apartment. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 15(4), 473–482 (2007)
Millan, J.R., Carmena, J.M.: Invasive or noninvasive: understanding brain-machine interface technology. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 29(1), 16–22 (2010)
Muller-Putz, G.R., Pfurtscheller, G.: Control of an electrical prosthesis with an SSVEP-based BCI. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 55, 361–364 (2008)
Pfurtscheller, G., Allison, B.Z., Brunner, C., Bauernfeind, G., Solis-Escalante, T., Scherer, R., Zander, T.O., Mueller-Putz, G., Neuper, C., Birbaumer, N.: The Hybrid BCI. Front. Neurosci. 21(4), 42 (2010)
Pfurtscheller, G., Neuper, C., Müller, G.R., Obermaier, B., Krausz, G., Schlögl, A., Scherer, R., Graimann, B., Keinrath, C., Skliris, D., Wörtz, M., Supp, G., Schrank, C.: Graz-BCI: state of the art and clinical applications. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 11(2), 177–180 (2003)
Popescu, F., Fazli, S., Badower, Y., Blankertz, B., Muller, K.-R.: Single trial classification of motor imagination using 6 dry EEG electrodes. PLoS One 2(7), e637 (2007)
Portnoy, W., David, R., Akers, L.: Insulated ECG Electrodes. In: Miller, H.A., Harrison, D.C. (eds.) Biomedical Electrode Technology. Academic Press, New York (1974)
Schalk, G., Kubanek, J., Miller, K.J., Anderson, N.R., Leuthardt, E.C., Ojemann, J.G., Limbrick, D., Moran, D., Gerhardt, L.A., Wolpaw, J.R.: Decoding two-dimensional movement trajectories using electrocorticographic signals in humans. J. Neural Eng. 4(3), 264–275 (2007)
Sellers, E.W.: Brain–computer interface research at the University of South Florida cognitive psychophysiology laboratory: the P300 speller. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 14(2), 221 (2006)
Sellers, E.W., Krusienski, D.J., McFarland, D.J., Vaughan, T.M., Wolpaw, J.R.: A P300 event-related potential brain–computer interface (BCI): The effects of matrix size and inter stimulus interval on performance. Biol. Psychol. 73, 242–252 (2006)
Taheri, B.A., Knight, R.T., Smith, R.L.: A dry electrode for EEG recording. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 90(5), 376–383 (1994)
Tam, H.W., Webster, J.G.: Minimizing electrode motion artifact by skin abrasion. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 24(2), 134–139 (1977)
Volosyak, I., Valbuena, D., Malechka, T., Peuscher, J., Graser, A.: Brain–computer interface using water-based electrodes. J. Neural Eng. 7(6), 066007 (2010)
Wolpaw, J.R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D.J., Pfurtscheller, G., Vaughan, T.M.: Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin. Neurophysiol. 113(6), 767–791 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Edlinger, G., Guger, C. (2012). Can Dry EEG Sensors Improve the Usability of SMR, P300 and SSVEP Based BCIs?. In: Allison, B., Dunne, S., Leeb, R., Del R. Millán, J., Nijholt, A. (eds) Towards Practical Brain-Computer Interfaces. Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29746-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29746-5_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29745-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29746-5
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)