Advertisement

Standard Proposal for Resonant Inductive Charging of Electric Vehicles

  • S. Mathar
  • J. Bärenfänger
  • K. Baier
  • A. Heinrich
  • W. Bilgic
  • V. Blandow
  • U. Blosfeld
  • B. Elias
  • R. Peer
  • T. Eymann
  • M. Hardt
  • J. Heuer
  • R. Knorr
  • R. Heinstein
  • S. Heusinger
  • G. Imgrund
  • S. Kiefer
  • S. Kümmell
  • D. Kürschner
  • U. Reker
  • J. Mahlein
  • M. Mahrt
  • R. Marklein
  • J. Meins
  • R. Plikat
  • C. Rathge
  • W. Schnurbusch
  • O. Simon
  • P. Stolte
  • E. Stolz

Abstract

Contactless energy transfer between power supply and electric vehicle as described in this proposal is based on the principle of resonant inductive coupling. A pair of charging pads, the stationary charging pad and the mobile charging pad, is used for this purpose. A charging pad may incorporate one or more coils and may be underlaid with material that is capable of conducting the magnetic field. As the stationary charging pad and the inverter are combined to form a unit within the stationary part (though they may be arranged at separate locations), no publicly accessible interfaces are required. The stationary part may be embedded in the ground and mounted flush with the road surface, or it may rest on the ground, e.g., for mounting in a garage. The inverter serves to convert the supply voltage and to set the frequency, current and voltage for the magnetic coil(s) of the stationary charging pad. In addition to the mobile charging pad, the mobile part of the charging equipment incorporates the on-board electronics.

Keywords

electric vehicle automatic charging smart grid wireless charging standardization magnetic resonant inductive charging wireless communication 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Mathar
    • 1
  • J. Bärenfänger
    • 2
  • K. Baier
    • 3
  • A. Heinrich
    • 3
  • W. Bilgic
    • 4
  • V. Blandow
    • 5
  • U. Blosfeld
    • 6
  • B. Elias
    • 7
  • R. Peer
    • 7
  • T. Eymann
    • 8
  • M. Hardt
    • 9
  • J. Heuer
    • 10
  • R. Knorr
    • 10
  • R. Heinstein
    • 11
  • S. Heusinger
    • 12
  • G. Imgrund
    • 12
  • S. Kiefer
    • 13
  • S. Kümmell
    • 14
  • D. Kürschner
    • 15
  • U. Reker
    • 15
  • J. Mahlein
    • 16
  • M. Mahrt
    • 17
  • R. Marklein
    • 18
  • J. Meins
    • 19
  • R. Plikat
    • 20
  • C. Rathge
    • 21
  • W. Schnurbusch
    • 22
  • O. Simon
    • 23
  • P. Stolte
    • 24
  • E. Stolz
    • 25
  1. 1.RWTH AachenMunichGermany
  2. 2.EMC TestDortmundGermany
  3. 3.DaimlerStuttgartGermany
  4. 4.IMSTMunichGermany
  5. 5.TÜV SüdGarchingGermany
  6. 6.TycoHeidelbergGermany
  7. 7.AudiMunichGermany
  8. 8.BoschGerlingenGermany
  9. 9.ESGMunichGermany
  10. 10.SiemensErlangenGermany
  11. 11.VDI/VDE Innovation + TechnikBerlinGermany
  12. 12.VDE DKEFrankfurtGermany
  13. 13.KiefermediaOffenburgGermany
  14. 14.IAVMunichGermany
  15. 15.VahleNiedersachsenGermany
  16. 16.Brose-SEWKarlsruheGermany
  17. 17.EonMunichGermany
  18. 18.Fraunhofer IWESKasselGermany
  19. 19.TU BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany
  20. 20.VolkswagenWolfsburgGermany
  21. 21.ifakMagdeburgGermany
  22. 22.Conductix-WampflerBöblingenGermany
  23. 23.SEW EurodriveBruchsalGermany
  24. 24.BombardierBerlinGermany
  25. 25.Park & ChargeBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations