Skip to main content

Viewpoints and Visualisation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Enterprise Architecture at Work

Part of the book series: The Enterprise Engineering Series ((TEES))

Abstract

Establishing and maintaining a coherent enterprise architecture is clearly a complex task, because it involves many different people with differing backgrounds using various notations. In order to get to grips with this complexity, researchers have initially focused on the definition of architectural frameworks for classifying and positioning the various architecture descriptions with respect to each other. A problem with looking at enterprise architecture through the lens of an architectural framework is that it categorises and divides architecture descriptions rather than providing insight into their coherence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ambler SW (2002), Agile Modeling – Effective Practices for Extreme Programming and the Unified Process. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruse DA (2000), Meaning in Language – An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein A, Kramer J, Nuseibeh B, Finkelstein L, Goedicke M (1992), Viewpoints: A Framework for Integrating Multiple Perspectives in System Development, International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Special issue on Trends and Research Directions in Software Engineering Environments, 2(1):31–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEEE Computer Society (2000), IEEE Std 1471–2000: IEEE Recommended Practice for Architecture description of Software-Intensive Systems. IEEE, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • ITU (1996), Open Distributed Processing – Reference Model – Part 1: Overview, ITU Recommendation X.901 | ISO/IEC 10746–1, International Telecommunication Union, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotonya G, Sommerville I (1992), Viewpoints for Requirements Definition. IEE/BCS Software Engineering Journal, 7(6):375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruchten P (1995), Architectural Blueprints – The ‘4+1’ View Model of Software Architecture, IEEE Software, 12(6):42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruchten P (2000), The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction, 2nd edition. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin RC (2002), Agile Software Development Principles, Patterns, and Practices, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuseibeh BA (1994), A Multi-Perspective Framework for Method Integration. PhD thesis, Imperial College, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olle TW, Hagelstein J, Macdonald IG, Rolland C, Sol HG, van Assche FJM Verrijn-Stuart AA (1988), Information Systems Methodologies: A Framework for Understanding. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proper HA (2004), Da Vinci – Architecture-Driven Information Systems Engineering. Nijmegen Institute for Information and Computing Sciences, University of Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves J, Marashi M, Budgen D (1995), A Software Design Framework or How to Support Real Designers, IEE/BCS Software Engineering Journal, 10(4):141–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rueping A (2003), Agile Documentation: A Pattern Guide to Producing Lightweight Documents for Software Projects. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen MWA, Doest HWL ter, Lankhorst MM, Akehurst DH (2004), Supporting Viewpoint-Oriented Enterprise Architecture. Proc. 8th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC’04), Monterey, California, September 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Open Group (2011), The Open Group Architectural Framework (TOGAF) Version 9.1. The Open Group, Reading, UK. http://www.opengroup.org/togaf/.

  • Van der Sanden WAM, Sturm BJAM (1997), Informatiearchitectuur, de infrastructurele benadering. Panfox, Rosmalen (in Dutch).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg GM (1988), Rethinking Systems Analysis & Design. Dorset House Publishing, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood-Harper AT, Antill L, Avison DE (1985), Information Systems Definition: The Multiview Approach. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachman JA (1987), A Framework for Information Systems Architecture, IBM Systems Journal, 26(3):276–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lankhorst, M. (2013). Viewpoints and Visualisation. In: Enterprise Architecture at Work. The Enterprise Engineering Series. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29651-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics