• Markus Hoopmann
  • Werner Dürr
  • Thierry Van den Bosch
  • Dirk Timmermann
  • Christoph Brezinka


Die sonografische Untersuchung des weiblichen Beckens hat sich in den letzten Jahrzehnten deutlich weiterentwickelt und neue Einsatzgebiete erschlossen. Ausschlaggebend war die enorme Weiterentwicklung der Gerätetechnik, die in den letzten Jahren zu einer erheblichen Verbesserung der Bildqualität und zur Entwicklung komplementärer Techniken (Farbdoppler‑, Doppler‑, 3D‑/4D-Sonografie und Hysterokontrastsonografie) geführt hat und die Qualität der sonografischen Diagnostik deutlich verbesserte.


  1. Amant F, Coosemans A, Debiec-Rychter M et al (2009) Clinical management of uterine sarcomas. Lancet Oncol 10:1188–1198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) (2012) AAGL practice report: practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of submucous leiomyomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19:152–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Fertility Society (1988) The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 49:944–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ami O, Lamazou F, Mabille M et al (2009) Real-time transvaginal elastosonography of uterine fibroids. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34:486–488CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bermejo C, Martinez Ten P, Cantarero R et al (2010) Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Mullerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35:593–601CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernaschek G, Lubec G, Schaller A (1984) Sonographic study of the growth of the uterus and ovaries between the ages of 1 and 14. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 44:727–730CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bezircioglu I, Baloglu A, Cetinkaya B et al (2012) The diagnostic value of the Doppler ultrasonography in distinguishing the endometrial malignancies in women with postmenopausal bleeding. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285:1369–1374CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Blake RE (2007) Leiomyomata uteri: hormonal and molecular determinants of growth. J Natl Med Assoc 99:1170–1184PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Brucker SY, Rall K, Campo R et al (2011) Treatment of congenital malformations. Semin Reprod Med 2(29):101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Champaneria R, Abedin P, Daniels J et al (2010) Ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review comparing test accuracy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 89:1374–1384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chan JK, Wu H, Cheung MK et al (2007) The outcomes of 27,063 women with unstaged endometrioid uterine cancer. Gynecol Oncol 106:282–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheng WF, Lin HH, Torng PL et al (1997) Comparison of endometrial changes among symptomatic tamoxifen-treated and nontreated premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 66:233–237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cil AP, Tulunay G, Kose MF et al (2010) Power Doppler properties of endometrial polyps and submucosal fibroids: a preliminary observational study in women with known intracavitary lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35:233–237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen I (2004) Endometrial pathologies associated with postmenopausal tamoxifen treatment. Gynecol Oncol 94:256–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Curtis KM, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA et al (2002) Disruption of the endometrial-myometrial border during pregnancy as a risk factor for adenomyosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:543–544CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. de Kroon CD, de Bock GH, Dieben SW et al (2003) Saline contrast hysterosonography in abnormal uterine bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 110:938–947CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. de Kroon CD, Jansen FW, Louwé LA et al (2003) Technology assessment of saline contrast hysterosonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:945–949CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. De Smet F, De Brabanter J, Van den Bosch T et al (2006) New models to predict depth of infiltration in endometrial carcinoma based on transvaginal sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27:664–671CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Deligdisch L, Kalir T, Cohen CJ et al (2000) Endometrial histopathology in 700 patients treated with tamoxifen for breast cancer. Gynecol Oncol 78:181–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Denschlag D, Ulrich U, Emons G (2011) The Diagnosis and treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Progress and Controversies. Dtsch Arztbl Int 108:571–577Google Scholar
  21. Devlieger R, D’Hooghe T, Timmerman D (2003) Uterine adenomyosis in the infertility clinic. Hum Reprod Update 9:139–147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Dreisler E, Stampe Sorensen S, Ibsen PH et al (2009) Prevalence of endometrial polyps and abnormal uterine bleeding in a Danish population aged 20–74 years. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33:102–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Dueholm M (2006) Transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of adenomyosis: a review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 20:569–582CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Dueholm M, Lundorf E (2007) Transvaginal ultrasound or MRI for diagnosis of adenomyosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19:505–512CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Dürr W (2012) Transvaginale Sonographie in der Gynäkologie. De Gruyter, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Exacoustos C, Brienza L, Di Giovanni A et al (2011) Adenomyosis: three-dimensional sonographic findings of the junctional zone and correlation with histology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37:471–479CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Exalto N, Stappers C, van Raamsdonk LA et al (2007) Gel instillation sonohysterography: first experience with a new technique. Fertil Steril 87:152–155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Fleischer AC, Wheeler JE, Lindsay I et al (2001) An assessment of the value of ultrasonographic screening for endometrial disease in postmenopausal women without symptoms. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:70–75CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Furness S, Roberts H, Marjoribanks J et al. (2009) Hormone therapy in postmenopausal women and risk of endometrial hyperplasia. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. CD000402.Google Scholar
  30. Fusi L, Cloke B, Brosens JJ (2006) The uterine junctional zone. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 20:479–491CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gembruch U, Merz E (2011) Standardization of ultrasound diagnostics in gynecology. Ultraschall Med 32:339–341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Goldstein SR (2009) The role of transvaginal ultrasound or endometrial biopsy in the evaluation of the menopausal endometrium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201:5–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Goldstein SR (2010) Modern evaluation of the endometrium. Obstet Gynecol 116:168–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Grab D, Merz E, Prompeler H et al (2011) Standards for ultrasound in gynecology. Ultraschall Med 32:415–417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Gupta S, Jain M (1998) Incidental observations during routine laparoscopic sterilisation. J Indian Med Assoc 96:365–366PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. He RH, Gao HJ, Li YQ et al (2010) The associated factors to endometrial cavity fluid and the relevant impact on the IVF-ET outcome. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 8:46CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Hennig Y, Deichert U, Bonk U et al (1999) Chromosomal translocations affecting 12q14-15 but not deletions of the long arm of chromosome 7 associated with a growth advantage of uterine smooth muscle cells. Mol Hum Reprod 5:1150–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ijland MM, Evers JL, Dunselman GA et al (1996) Endometrial wavelike movements during the menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril 65:746–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jacobs I, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M et al (2011) Sensitivity of transvaginal ultrasound screening for endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women: a case-control study within the UKCTOCS cohort. Lancet Oncol 12:38–48CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Kepkep K, Tuncay YA, Goynumer G et al (2007) Transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis: which findings are most accurate? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:341–345CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kolankaya A, Arici A (2006) Myomas and assisted reproductive technologies: when and how to act? Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 33:145–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kunz G, Beil D, Deininger H et al (1996) The dynamics of rapid sperm transport through the female genital tract: evidence from vaginal sonography of uterine peristalsis and hysterosalpingoscintigraphy. Hum Reprod 11:627–632CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Kunz G, Beil D, Huppert P et al (2000) Structural abnormalities of the uterine wall in women with endometriosis and infertility visualized by vaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod 15:76–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lee CL, Jain S, Wang CJ et al (2001) Classification for endoscopic treatment of mullerian anomalies with an obstructive cervix. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 8:402–408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Leone FP, Carsana L, Lanzani C et al (2007) Sonohysterographic endometrial sampling and hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy: a comparative study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:443–448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Leone FP, Timmerman D, Bourne T et al (2010) Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of the endometrium and intrauterine lesions: a consensus opinion from the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35:103–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Lermann J, Mueller A, Wiesinger E et al (2011) Comparison of different diagnostic procedures for the staging of malformations associated with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril 96:156–159CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Lev-Sagie A, Hamani Y, Imbar T et al (2005) The significance of intrauterine lesions detected by ultrasound in asymptomatic postmenopausal patients. BJOG 112:379–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Leyendecker G, Kunz G, Noe M et al (1998) Endometriosis: a dysfunction and disease of the archimetra. Hum Reprod Update 4:752–762CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Lyons EA, Taylor PJ, Zheng XH et al (1991) Characterization of subendometrial myometrial contractions throughout the menstrual cycle in normal fertile women. Fertil Steril 55:771–774CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Matijevic R, Grgic O (2005) Predictive values of ultrasound monitoring of the menstrual cycle. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 17:405–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Mavrelos D, Ben-Nagi J, Holland T et al (2010) The natural history of fibroids. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35:238–242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Naftalin J, Jurkovic D (2009) The endometrial-myometrial junction: a fresh look at a busy crossing. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34:1–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Naftalin J, Nunes N, Hoo W et al (2012) Endometrial cancer and ultrasound: why measuring endometrial thickness is sometimes not enough. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:106–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Nirmal D, Griffiths AN, Jose G et al (2006) Warming Echovist contrast medium for hysterocontrastsonography and the effect on the incidence of pelvic pain. A randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod 21:1052–1054CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Okolo S (2008) Incidence, aetiology and epidemiology of uterine fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 22:571–588CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Oppelt P, Renner SP, Brucker S et al (2005) The VCUAM (Vagina Cervix Uterus Adnex-associated Malformation) classification: a new classification for genital malformations. Fertil Steril 84:1493–1497CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Parker WH (2007) Etiology, symptomatology, and diagnosis of uterine myomas. Fertil Steril 87:725–736CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Parker WH, Fu YS, Berek JS (1994) Uterine sarcoma in patients operated on for presumed leiomyoma and rapidly growing leiomyoma. Obstet Gynecol 83:414–418PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Peddada SD, Laughlin SK, Miner K et al (2008) Growth of uterine leiomyomata among premenopausal black and white women. P Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19887–19892CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Pepas L, Deguara C, Davis C (2012) Update on the surgical management of adenomyosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 24:259–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Perrot N, Frey I, Mergui JL et al (2001) Picture of the month. Adenomyosis: power Doppler findings. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 17:177–178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Polin SA, Ascher SM (2008) The effect of tamoxifen on the genital tract. Cancer Imaging 8:135–145CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Rein MS, Powell WL, Walters FC et al (1998) Cytogenetic abnormalities in uterine myomas are associated with myoma size. Mol Hum Reprod 4:83–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Rozewicki S, Bielewicz W, Iwanicki M et al (1992) Developmental anomalies of the uterus in a population of 3000 women with various causes of infertility. Ginekol Pol 63:515–517PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Ryan GL, Syrop CH, Van Voorhis BJ (2005) Role, epidemiology, and natural history of benign uterine mass lesions. Clin Obstet Gynecol 48:312–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Samuels TA, Awonuga A (2005) Second-trimester rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy: rupture after labor induction with misoprostol. Obstet Gynecol 106:1160–1162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Savelli L, Testa AC, Mabrouk M et al (2012) A prospective blinded comparison of the accuracy of transvaginal sonography and frozen section in the assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 124:549–552CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Schmidt T, Nawroth F, Breidenbach M et al (2005) Differential indication for histological evaluation of endometrial fluid in postmenopause. Maturitas 50:177–181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Shushan A, Revel A, Rojansky N (2004) How often are endometrial polyps malignant? Gynecol Obstet Invest 58:212–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Stewart EA, Taran FA, Chen J et al (2011) Magnetic resonance elastography of uterine leiomyomas: a feasibility study. Fertil Steril 95:281–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Takacs P, De Santis T, Nicholas MC et al (2005) Echogenic endometrial fluid collection in postmenopausal women is a significant risk factor for disease. J Ultrasound Med 24:1477–1481CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Taran FA, Weaver AL, Coddington CC et al (2010) Characteristics indicating adenomyosis coexisting with leiomyomas: a case-control study. Hum Reprod 25:1177–1182CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Tetlow RL, Richmond I, Manton DJ et al (1999) Histological analysis of the uterine junctional zone as seen by transvaginal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 14:188–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Timmerman D, Verguts J, Konstantinovic ML et al (2003) The pedicle artery sign based on sonography with color Doppler imaging can replace second-stage tests in women with abnormal vaginal bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22:166–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Troiano RN, McCarthy SM (2004) Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology 233:19–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Van den Bosch T, Betsas G, Van Schoubroeck D et al (2009) Gel infusion sonography in the evaluation of the uterine cavity. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34:711–714CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Van den Bosch T, Coosemans A, Morina M et al (2012) Screening for uterine tumours. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 26:257–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Van den Bosch T, Van Schoubroeck D, Daemen A et al (2011) Lidocaine does not reduce pain perception during gel instillation sonography or subsequent office hysteroscopy: results of a randomized trial. Gynecol Obstet Invest 71:236–239CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Van Den Bosch T, Van Schoubroeck D, Luts J et al (2011) Effect of gel-instillation sonography on Doppler ultrasound findings in endometrial polyps. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 38:355–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Van den Bosch T, Van Schoubroeck D, Van Calster B et al (2012) Pre-sampling ultrasound evaluation and assessment of the tissue yield during sampling improves the diagnostic reliability of office endometrial biopsy. J Obstet Gynaecol 32:173–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Van den Bosch T, Verguts J, Daemen A et al (2008) Pain experienced during transvaginal ultrasound, saline contrast sonohysterography, hysteroscopy and office sampling: a comparative study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:346–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Verma SK, Lev-Toaff AS, Baltarowich OH et al (2009) Adenomyosis: sonohysterography with MRI correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1112–1116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Vessey MP, Villard-Mackintosh L, McPherson K et al (1992) The epidemiology of hysterectomy: findings in a large cohort study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 99:402–407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Vitiello D, McCarthy S (2006) Diagnostic imaging of myomas. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 33:85–95CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Wamsteker K, Emanuel MH, de Kruif JH (1993) Transcervical hysteroscopic resection of submucous fibroids for abnormal uterine bleeding: results regarding the degree of intramural extension. Obstet Gynecol 82:736–740PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Werbrouck E, Veldman J, Luts J et al (2011) Detection of endometrial pathology using saline infusion sonography versus gel instillation sonography: a prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril 95:285–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Wetzstein R, Renn KH (1970) Arrangement of smooth muscle in the human uterus. Verh Anat Ges 64:461–468PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Wolfman W, Leyland N, Heywood M et al (2010) Asymptomatic endometrial thickening. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 32:990–999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markus Hoopmann
    • 2
  • Werner Dürr
    • 3
  • Thierry Van den Bosch
    • 4
  • Dirk Timmermann
    • 5
  • Christoph Brezinka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department für FrauenheilkundeUniversitätsklinik für Gynäkologische Endokrinologie und ReproduktionsmedizinInnsbruckÖsterreich
  2. 2.FrauenklinikUniversitätsklinikum TübingenTübingenDeutschland
  3. 3.Gemeinschaftspraxis für Frauenmedizin und PränataldiagnostikFeindiagnostik NürtingenNürtingenDeutschland
  4. 4.Screening DiagnosticsKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgien
  5. 5.Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospitals Leuven, Campus GasthuisbergLeuvenBelgien

Personalised recommendations