Abstract
Hardware security is an essential tool in the prevention of cloning, theft of service and tampering. This security is often based on cryptographic primitives, which use a key that is securely stored somewhere in the hardware. The strength of the security is therefore dependent upon the effort required from an attacker to compromise this key. Since the tools used to carry out attacks on hardware have increased significantly over the years, the protection provided by simply storing a key in memory has decreased to a minimum. In order to protect devices against attacks on their keys, Hardware Intrinsic Security (HIS) can be used. One of the best known types of HIS primitives are Physically Unclonable Functions (PUFs). PUFs are primitives that extract secrets from physical characteristics of integrated circuits (ICs) and can be used, amongst others, in secure key storage implementations. This paper describes the results of our study on two important types of intrinsic PUFs, based on SRAM and D flip-flops. Both memory types present a specific start-up pattern (when powered up), which can be used as a PUF. For secure practical applications, a PUF should possess enough reliability for a single device and enough randomness between different devices. In this paper, a general test framework is proposed for measuring this reliability and randomness of both PUF types. Based on this framework, tests have been performed on PUFs in 65nm ICs and results are presented and compared between PUF types. From these results it can be concluded that SRAMs are slightly outperforming D flip-flop memories when it comes to usage for PUF implementations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ravikanth, P.S.: Physical one-way functions. PhD thesis, AAI0803255 (2001)
Gassend, B., Clarke, D., van Dijk, M., Devadas, S.: Silicon physical random functions. In: ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 148–160. ACM Press, New York (2002)
Lee, J.W., Lim, D., Gassend, B., Suh, G.E., Dijk, M.V., Devadas, S.: A technique to build a secret key in integrated circuits with identification and authentication applications. In: Proceedings of the IEEE VLSI Circuits Symposium, pp. 176–179 (2004)
Guajardo, J., Kumar, S.S., Schrijen, G.-J., Tuyls, P.: FPGA Intrinsic PUFs and Their Use for IP Protection. In: Paillier, P., Verbauwhede, I. (eds.) CHES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4727, pp. 63–80. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Kumar, S.S., Guajardo, J., Maes, R., Schrijen, G.J., Tuyls, P.: The Butterfly PUF: Protecting IP on every FPGA, pp. 67–70 (2008)
Maes, R., Tuyls, P., Verbauwhede, I.: Intrinsic PUFs from Flip-flops on reconfigurable devices. In: 3rd Benelux Workshop on Information and System Security (WISSec 2008), Eindhoven, NL, p. 17 (2008)
Sadeghi, A.-R., Naccache, D.: Towards Hardware-Intrinsic Security: Foundations and Practice, 1st edn. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York (2010)
Selimis, G.N., Konijnenburg, M., Ashouei, M., Huisken, J., de Groot, H., van der Leest, V., Schrijen, G.J., van Hulst, M., Tuyls, P.: Evaluation of 90nm 6T-SRAM as Physical Unclonable Function for secure key generation in wireless sensor nodes. In: ISCAS, pp. 567–570 (2011)
Tuyls, P., Skoric, B., Kevenaar, T.: Security with Noisy Data: Private Biometrics, Secure Key Storage and Anti-Counterfeiting. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus (2007)
Dodis, Y., Ostrovsky, R., Reyzin, L., Smith, A.: Fuzzy extractors: How to generate strong keys from biometrics and other noisy data. SIAM J. Comput. 38, 97–139 (2008)
Claes, M., van der Leest, V.: PUFPUF test results. Tech. rep., Intrinsic-ID (2011)
Altera, Reliability report 49 q1 2010, Tech. rep.
Bösch, C., Guajardo, J., Sadeghi, A.-R., Shokrollahi, J., Tuyls, P.: Efficient Helper Data Key Extractor on FPGAs. In: Oswald, E., Rohatgi, P. (eds.) CHES 2008. LNCS, vol. 5154, pp. 181–197. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Willems, F., Shtarkov, Y., Tjalkens, T.: Context-Tree Weighting: Basic properties. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 41, 644–653 (1995)
van der Leest, V., Schrijen, G.-J., Handschuh, H., Tuyls, P.: Hardware intrinsic security from D flip-flops. In: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Workshop on Scalable Trusted Computing, STC 2010, pp. 53–62. ACM, New York (2010)
Barker, E., Kelsey, J.: NIST Special Publication 800-90: Recommendation for random number generation using deterministic random bit generators (revised), NIST, Tech. rep. (March 2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Claes, M., van der Leest, V., Braeken, A. (2012). Comparison of SRAM and FF PUF in 65nm Technology. In: Laud, P. (eds) Information Security Technology for Applications. NordSec 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7161. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29615-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29615-4_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29614-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29615-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)