Skip to main content

Reflections on Scientific Inquiry, Academic Freedom, and Enlightenment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1080 Accesses

Abstract

In this essay I will offer some reflections on the connections between scientific inquiry, scholarly reflexivity, and enlightenment. I must observe at the outset that I regard this special issue of Journal of Chinese Political Science—and the collaborative planning and global communication that made it possible—as a perfect venue for the discussion of these themes, but also as a wonderful enactment of the kind of the link between inquiry and an ethic of intellectual freedom about which I will comment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Prepared for presentation at the International Conference on Dignity, Equality, and Justice, hosted by the China Center for Comparative Politics and Economics (CCCPE) and sponsored by the Ford Foundation, on December 16–19, 2010 in Beijing.

  2. 2.

    See the essays collected in Yu Keping, Democracy Is a Good Thing(Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2009), and especially Yu Keping, “Ideological Change and Incremental Democracy in Reform-Era China,” in Cheng Li, ed., China’s Changing Political Landscape: Prospects for Democracy(Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2008).

  3. 3.

    This discussion is drawn from my article “Social Science and Liberal Values in a Time of War.” Perspectives on Politics2:3 (September 2004), pp. 475–83.

  4. 4.

    The term “republic of letters” is usually associated with the cosmopolitan literary culture of the eighteenth century European Enlightenment. Jurgen Habermas’s The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphereremains the seminal work on the Enlightenment as a transnational discourse centered on the circulation of the written word in its many formats.

  5. 5.

    Yu Keping, “The Study of Political Science and Public Administration in China,” in Democracy Is a Good Thing, pp. 6–26. I have also found useful articles by Deng Zhenglai, He Li, Yang Zhong, Jon R. Taylor, Guangbin Yang and Miao Li in a special issue of Journal of Chinese Political Sciencedevoted to “The State of the Field: Political Science and Chinese Political Studies.”

  6. 6.

    Ibid., p. 12.

  7. 7.

    Ibid., pp. 13–14.

  8. 8.

    Yu Keping, “The Study of Political Science,” op. cit., p. 20.

  9. 9.

    Ibid., pp. 20–21.

  10. 10.

    Yu Keping, “Culture and Modernity in Chinese Intellectual Discourse: A Historical Perspective,” in Democracy Is a Good Thing, pp. 93–112. Also useful is Wei Zhang, What Is Enlightenment: Can China Answer Kant’s Question?(SUNY Press, 2010).

  11. 11.

    Yu Keping, “The Study of Political Science and Public Administration in China,” p. 10.

References

  • Isaac JC (2004) Social science and liberal values in a time of war. Perspect Polit 2(3):475–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Keping Yu (2008) Ideological change and incremental democracy in reform-era China. In: Li C (ed) China’s changing political landscape: prospects for democracy. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Keping Yu (2009a) Democracy is a good thing. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Keping Yu (2009b) The study of political science and public administration in China. In: Democracy is a good thing, Washington, DC, pp 6–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Keping Yu (2009c) Culture and modernity in Chinese intellectual discourse: a historical perspective. In: Democracy is a good thing, Washington, DC, pp 93–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Keping Yu (2009d) The study of political science and public administration in China, Washington, DC, p 10

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx K (1842) The leading article in No. 179 of the Kolnische Zeitung (1842). @ http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1842/07/10.htm

  • Monroe K (2005) Perestroika: a raucous rebellion in political science. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RS (2006) Democratic transitions and the progress of Absolutism in Kant’s political thought. J Polit 68(3):556–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (1946) Science as a vocation. In: Gerth HH, Wright Mills C (eds) From Max Weber: essays in sociology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 145

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (1949) The meaning of ‘ethical neutrality’ in sociology and economics. In: Shils EA, Finch HA (eds) The methodology of the social sciences. Free Press, New York, p 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W (2010) What is enlightenment: can China answer Kant’s question? SUNY Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong Y (2009) The logic of comparative politics and the development of political science in China. J Chin Polit Sci 14:335–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey C. Isaac .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Isaac, J.C. (2013). Reflections on Scientific Inquiry, Academic Freedom, and Enlightenment. In: Guo, S. (eds) Political Science and Chinese Political Studies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29590-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics