Skip to main content

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Medial Osteoarthritis: The Basics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
ESSKA Instructional Course Lecture Book

Abstract

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is designed for patients presenting isolated degenerative unicompartmental medial or lateral femorotibial wear or wear related to aseptic osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle, most frequently medial.

Chapter edited by J.N. Argenson. © ESSKA

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Berger R, Meneghini RM et al (2005) Results of unicompartmental arthroplasty at a minimum of 10 year follow up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87A:999–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cartier P, Sanouillet JL et al (1996) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty after 10-year minimum follow up period. J Arthroplasty 11:782–788

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Marmor L (1988) Unicompartmental knee, arthroplasty. Ten to 13 year follow up study. Clin Orthop 226:14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Rourke M, Gardner J et al (2005) Unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 21 year follow-up. End result study. Clin Orthop 440:27–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Parratte S, Argenson JN et al (2009) Medial unicompartmental knee replacement in the under 50’s. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91B:351–356

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pennington DW, Swienckowski JJ et al (2003) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85A:1968–1973

    Google Scholar 

  7. Squire M, Callaghan J et al (1999) Unicompartmental knee replacement: a minimum 15 year follow up study. Clin Orthop 367:61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Deshmuckh RV, Scott RD (2001) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long term results. Clin Orthop 392:272–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Geller J, Yoon RS et al (2008) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A controversial history and a rationale for contemporary resurgence. J Knee Surg 21:7–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McAllister CM (2008) The role of UKA versus TKA in providing maximal performance and satisfaction. J Knee Surg 21:286–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gibson PH, Goodfellow JW (1986) Stress radiography in degenerative arthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68B:608–609

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gulati A, Pandit H et al (2009) The effect of leg alignment on the outcome of unicompartmental replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:469–474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Goodfellow J et al (2006) Unicompartmental arthroplasty with the Oxford knee. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  14. Price AJ (2003) Medial meniscal bearing arthroplasty: wear, mechanics and clinical outcome. D Phil Thesis, University of Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  15. Furnes O, Espehaug B et al (2007) Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:519–525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith TO, Hing CB et al (2009) Fixed versus mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement: a meta-analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:599–605

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Parratte S, Pauly V et al (2012) No long-term difference between fixed and mobile medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:61–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bonutti PM, Dethmers DA (2008) Contemporary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: fixed vs mobile bearing. J Arthroplasty 23(7 Suppl):24–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kretzer JP, Jakubowitz E et al (2011) Wear analysis of unicondylar mobile bearing and fixed bearing knee systems: a knee simulator study. Acta Biomater 7:710–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Parratte S, Pauly V et al (2010) Survival of bicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 5 to 23 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:64–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Argenson JN, Parratte S et al (2009) The new arthritic patient and arthroplasty treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(Suppl 5):43–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rolston L, Bresch J et al (2007) Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a bone-sparing, ligament-sparing, and minimally invasive alternative for active patients. Orthopedics 30:70–73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Trompeter AJ, Gill K et al (2009) Predicting anterior cruciate ligament integrity in patients with osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:595–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Deschamps G, Lapeyre B (1987) Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament: a frequently unrecognized cause of failure of unicompartmental knee prostheses. A propos of a series of 79 Lotus pros theses with a follow-up of more than 5 years. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 73:544–551, 1

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Komistek RD, Allain J et al (2002) In vivo kinematics for subjects with and without an anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop 404:315–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pandit H, Beard DJ et al (2006) Combined anterior cruciate reconstruction and Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88-B:887–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Argenson JN, Chevrol-Benkeddache Y et al (2002) Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84A:2235–2239

    Google Scholar 

  28. Argenson JN, Komistek RD et al (2002) In vivo determination of knee kinematics for subjects implanted with a unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:1049–1054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Deschamps G, Chol Ch (2011) Fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Patients selection and operative technique. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97:648–661. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2011.08.003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Stern SH, Becker MW et al (1993) Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. An evaluation of selection criteria. Clin Orthop 286:143–148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. White SH, Ludkowski PF et al (1991) Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73-B:582–586

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jean-Noël Argenson , Jean-Noël Argenson or Jean-Noël Argenson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 ESSKA

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Deschamps, G. et al. (2012). Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Medial Osteoarthritis: The Basics. In: Menetrey, J., Zaffagnini, S., Fritschy, D., van Dijk, N. (eds) ESSKA Instructional Course Lecture Book. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29446-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29446-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29445-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29446-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics