Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Akuttherapie

  • Chapter
Mechanische Herz-Kreislauf-Unterstützung

  • 3115 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Bei der Technik der intraaortalen Gegenpulsation (IABP) handelt es sich um die einfachste invasive Form der mechanischen Kreislaufunterstützung (MKU). Eine IABP ist in nahezu allen kardiologischen und kardiochirurgischen Kliniken verfügbar, sie ist schnell bettseitig einsetzbar, effektiv, verhältnismäßig kostengünstig und ein komplikationsarmes Verfahren.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

Literatur zu 3.1

  • Briguori C, Sarais C, Pagnotta P, Airoldi F, Liistro F et al (2003) Elective versus provisional intraaortic balloon pumping in high-risk percutanous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 145: 700-707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christenson JT, Simonet F, Badel P, Schmuziger M (1999) Optimal timing of preoperative intraaortic balloon pump support in high-risk coronary patients. Ann Thorac Surg 68: 934-939

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collison SP, Dagar KS (2007) The role of intraaortic balloon pump in supporting children with acute cardiac failure. Postgrad Med J 83: 308-311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craver JM, Murrah CP (2001) Elective intraaortic balloon counterpulsation for high-risk off-pump coronary artery bypass operations. Ann Thorac Surg 71: 1220-1223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan HB, Goksedef D, Erentug V et al (2006) In which patients should sheathless IABP be used? An analysis of vascular complications in 1211 cases. J Cardiovasc Surg 21(4): 342-346

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson JJ 3rd, Cohen M, Freedman RJ Jr et al (2001) The current practice of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: Results from the Benchmark Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 38(5): 1456-1462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs RM, Brin KP, Brinker JA, Guzman PA, Heuser RR, Yin FC (1983) Augmentation of coronary blood flow by intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with unstable angina. Circulation 68: 117-123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harken DE (1976) Counterpulsation. Med Instrum 10(5): 215

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hochman JS, Boland J, Sleeper LA, Porway M, Brinker J et al for SHOCK Registry Investigators (1995) Current spectrum of cardiogenic shock and effect of early revascularization on mortality. Results of an international registry. Circulation 91: 873-881

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kantrowitz A (1953) Experimental augmentation of coronary flow by retardation of the arterial pressure pulse. Surgery 34(4): 678-687

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kantrowitz A, Tjonneland S, Freed PS et al (1968) Initial clinical experience with intraaortic balloon pumping in cardiogenic shock. JAMA 203(2): 113-118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay AC, Khaghani A, Dalby MCD (2009) Intra-aortic balloon and other counterpulsation techniques In: ISHLT Monograph Series 3, Advanced Heart Failure, Elsevier, Philadelphia London, Toronto Montreal Sydney Tokyo, S 557-568

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcu CB, Donohue TJ, Ferneini A, Ghantous AE (2006) Intraaortic balloon pump insertion through the subclavian artery. Subclavian artery insertion of IABP Heart Lung Circ 15(2): 148-150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulopoulos SD, Topaz S, Kolff WJ (1962) Diastolic balloon pumping (with carbon dioxide) in the aorta- a mechanical assistance to the failing circulation. Am Heart J 63: 669-675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ohman EM, Califf RM, George BS, Quigley PJ, Kereiakes DJ et al for the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) Study Group (1991) The use of intraaortic balloon pumping as an adjunct to reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 121(3Pt1): 895-901

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Onorati F, Impiombato B, Ferraro A, Comi MC, Spaccarotella C et al (2007) Transbrachial intraaortic balloon pumping in severe peripheral atherosclerosis. Ann Thorac Surg 84(1): 264-266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santini F, Mazzucco A (1997) Transthoracic intraaortic counterpulsation: A simple method for ballon catheter positioning. Ann Thorac Surg 64: 859-860

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stone G, Marsalese D, Brodie B, Griffin J, Donohue B et al (1995a) The routine of intra aortic balloon after primary PTCA improves clinical outcomes in very high-risk patients with acute myocardial infarction: Results of the PAMI-2 Trial (abstract). Circulation 92(I): 139

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone G, Marsalese D, Brodie B, Griffin J, Donohue B et al (1995b) Is prophylactic IABP use beneficial or harmful in a high risk elderly population with acute myocardial infarction? Results of the PAMI-2 trial (abstract). Circulation 92(I): 139

    Google Scholar 

Literatur zu 3.2

  • Alasnag MA, Gardi DO, Elder M, Kannam H, Ali F et al (2011) Use of the Impella 2.5 for prophylactic circulatory support during elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 12(5): 299-303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alli OO, Singh IM, Holmes DR, Jr., Pulido JN, Park SJ, Rihal CS (2012) Percutaneous left ventricular assist device with TandemHeart for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: The mayo clinic experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012 Feb 29. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23465. [Epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  • Amico A, Brigiani MS, Vallabini A, Ferrante B, Marzovillo A et al (2008) a new short-term ventricular assist device: our experience in off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 9(4): 423-426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasiadis K, Chalvatzoulis O, Antonitsis P, Tossios P, Papakonstantinou C (2011) Left ventricular decompression during peripheral extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support with the use of the novel iVAC pulsatile paracorporeal assist device. Ann Thorac Surg 92(6): 2257-2259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Basra SS, Loyalka P, Kar B (2011) Current status of percutaneous ventricular assist devices for cardiogenic shock. Curr Opin Cardiol 26(6): 548-554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhoff D, Cohen H, Brunckhorst C, O’Neill WW (2006) A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J 152(3): 469-468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon SR, Henriques JP, Mauri L, Sjauw K, Civitello A et al (2009) A prospective feasibility trial investigating the use of the Impella 2.5 system in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (The PROTECT I Trial): initial U.S. experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2(2): 91-96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Froesch P, Martinelli M, Meier P, Cook S, Hullin R, et al (2011) Clinical use of temporary percutaneous left ventricular assist devices. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 78(2): 304-313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins J, Lamarche Y, Kaan A, Stevens LM, Cheung A (2011) Microaxial devices for ventricular failure: a multicentre, population-based experience. Can J Cardiol 27(6): 725-730.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacic JC, Nguyen HT, Karajgikar R, Sharma SK, Kini AS (2011) The impella recover 2.5 and TandemHeart ventricular assist devices are safe and associated with equivalent clinical outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011 Jan 13 [Epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  • Maini B, Naidu SS, Mulukutla S, Kleiman N, Schreiber T et al (2011) Real-world use of the impella 2.5 circulatory support system in complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: The uspella registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011 Nov 22. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23403. [Epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels LE, Kaufman MS, Thomas MP, Holmes EC, Brockman SK, Wechsler AS (1999) Pharmacological criteria for ventricular assist device insertion following postcardiotomy shock: experience with the Abiomed BVS system. J Card Surg 14(4): 288-293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz BG, Ludeman DJ, Mayeda GS, Kloner RA, Economides C, Burstein S. (2011) High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the TandemHeart and Impella devices: a single-center experience. J Invasive Cardiol 23(10): 417-424

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth M, Sibbing D, Bauer I, Frohlich G, Bott-Flugel L et al (2008) A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(19): 1584-1588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siegenthaler MP, Brehm K, Strecker T, Hanke T, Notzold A et al (2004) The Impella Recover microaxial left ventricular assist device reduces mortality for postcardiotomy failure: a three-center experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127(3): 812-822

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tempelhof MW, Klein L, Cotts WG, Benzuly KH, Davidson CJ et al (2011) Clinical experience and patient outcomes associated with the TandemHeart percutaneous transseptal assist device among a heterogeneous patient population. ASAIO J 57(4): 254-261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thiele H, Lauer B, Hambrecht R, Boudriot E, Cohen HA, Schuler G. (2001) Reversal of cardiogenic shock by percutaneous left atrial-to-femoral arterial bypass assistance. Circulation 104(24): 2917-2922

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Literatur zu 3.3

  • Arlt M, Philipp A, Voelkel S, Camboni D, Rupprecht L et al (2011) Hand-held minimised extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a new bridge to recovery in patients with out-of-centre cardiogenic shock. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 40(3): 689-694

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arlt M, Philipp A, Voelkel S, Graf BM, Schmid C, Hilker M (2011) Out-of-hospital extracorporeal life support for cardiac arrest-A case report. Resuscitation 82(9): 1243-1245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arlt M, Philipp A, Zimmermann M, Voelkel S, Amann M et al (2009) Emergency Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Cardiopulmonary Failure. Artifi Org 33(9): 696-703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beurtheret S, Mordant P, Paoletti X, Marijon E, Celermajer DS et al (2012) Emergency circulatory support in refractory cardiogenic shock patients in remote institutions: a pilot study (the cardiac-RESCUE program), Eur Heart J 2012, Apr. 17. [Epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen YS, Lin JW, Yu HY, Ko WJ, Jerng JS et al (2008) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with assisted extracorporeal life-support versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study and propensity analysis. Lancet 372(9638): 554-561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YS, Yu HY, Huang SC, Lin JW et al (2008) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support can extend the duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med 36: 2529-2535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Combes A, Leprince P, Luyt CE, Bonnet N, Trouillet JL et al (2008) Outcomes and long-term quality-of-life of patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock: Crit Care Med 36: 1404-1411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le Guen M, Nicolas-Robin A, Carreira S, Raux M, Leprince P et al (2011) Extracorporeal life support following out-of-hospital refractory cardiac arrest, Critical Care 15: R29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lin JW, Wang MJ, Yu HY, Wang CH, Chang WT et al (2010) Comparing the survival between extracorporeal rescue and conventional resuscitation in adult in-hospital cardiac arrests: Propensity analysis of three-year data. Resuscitation 81(7): 796-803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Massetti M, Tasle M, Le Page O, Deredec R, Babatasi G et al (2005) Back from Irreversibility: Extracorporeal Life Support for Prolonged Cardiac Arrest. Ann Thorac Surg 79: 178-183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peek GJ (2011) Community extracorporeal life support for cardiac arrest - When should it be used? Resuscitation 82: 1117 editorial

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ranucci M, Ballotta A, Kandil H, Isgrö G, Carlucci C et al for the Surgical and Clinical Outcome Research Group (2011) Bivalirudin-based versus conventional heparin anticoagulation for postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Critical Care 15: R275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiagarajan RR, Brogan TV, Scheurer MA, Laussen PC, Rycus PT, Bratton SL (2009) Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation to Support Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Adults. Ann Thorac Surg 87:778-85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Literatur zu 3.4

  • Chen et al (2009) CPR vs ECPR for in hospital Cardiac Arrset (Taiwan) Lancet

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppola CP, Tyreeb M, Larryb K, Di Geronimob R (2008) A 22-year experience in global transport extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Ped Surg 43, 46-52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichol G, Thomas E, Callaway CW et al (2008) Regional Variation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Incidence and Outcome, Jama 300(12)1423-1431 EASA, www.easa.europa.eu

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett R, Gattinoni L (2010) Current status of extracorporeal life support (ECMO) for cardiopulmonary failure. Minerva Anestesiol 76 (7): 534-540

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid C, Philipp A, Müller T, Hilker M (2009) Extracorporeal Life Support Systems, Indications and Limitations. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 57: 449-454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bisdas T, Beutel G, Warnecke G et al (2011) Vascular complications in patients undergoing femoral cannulation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Ann Thorac Surg 92(2):626-631, Epub 2011 May 8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berdajs D, Born F, Crosset M et al (2010) Superior venous drainage in the „Life Box»: a portable extracorporeal oxygenator with a self-expanding venous cannula. Perfusion 25: 211-215 http://www.elso.med.umich.edu/

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Güngerich A,(2010) Ein Herz will weiterschlagen. 1414 Gönnermagazin der Schweizerischen Rettungsflugwacht 74: 12-13

    Google Scholar 

  • Born F, Ammann U, Burren T, Albrecht R et al (2010) Transatlantikflug mit transportabler HerzLungen-Maschine «LifeBox«, Kardiotechnik (3): 65-69

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Kardiovaskuläre Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf

    Prof. Dr. med. U. Boeken & Dr. med. A. Assmann

  2. Herzchirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München – Großhadern, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München

    F. Born MCT

  3. Klinik für Herz-, Thorax- und herznahe Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg

    Prof. Dr. med. C. Schmid

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. med. U. Boeken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. med. A. Assmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Born MCT
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Prof. Dr. med. C. Schmid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Kardiovaskuläre Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf

    Udo Boeken  & Alexander Assmann  & 

  2. Herzchirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München – Großhadern, München

    Frank Born MCT (Leiter Kardiotechnik Herzchirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik) (Leiter Kardiotechnik Herzchirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik)

  3. Klinik für Herz-, Thorax- und herznahe Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg

    Christof Schmid

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boeken, U., Assmann, A., Born, F., Schmid, C. (2013). Akuttherapie. In: Boeken, U., Assmann, A., Born, F., Schmid, C. (eds) Mechanische Herz-Kreislauf-Unterstützung. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29408-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29408-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29407-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29408-2

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation