Advertisement

An Agent Model for Cognitive and Affective Empathic Understanding of Other Agents

  • Zulfiqar A. Memon
  • Jan Treur
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7190)

Abstract

This paper focuses on modelling capabilities to interpret another person’s mind, taking into account both affective and cognitive states. A basic agent model to generate emotional responses and feelings in response to certain stimuli is taken as a point of departure. For the case these stimuli concern observation of another person’s body state (e.g., face expressions), emotion reading is achieved, following the Simulation Theory approach to mindreading. Furthermore, by taking (internal) cognitive states instead of stimuli as a source for emotional responses, it is shown how to model the way in which a person associates feelings to cognitive states. Moreover, it is shown how another person can obtain empathic understanding of a person by simulating the way in which feelings are associated to cognitive states. The obtained agent model describes how the empathic agent deals with another agent’s cognitive states and the associated feelings, thus not only understanding the other agent’s cognitive state but at the same time feeling the accompanying emotion of the other agent.

Keywords

Cognitive agent model empathic understanding mindreading 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baron-Cohen, S.: Mindblindness. MIT Press (1995) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bates, J., Loyall, A.B., Reilly, W.S.: An Architecture for Action, Emotion, and Social Behavior. In: Castelfranchi, C., Werner, E. (eds.) MAAMAW 1992. LNCS, vol. 830, pp. 55–68. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bickmore, T., Fernando, R., Ring, L., Schulman, D.: Empathic Touch by Relational Agents. IEEE Trans. on Affective Computing 1, 60–71 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bickmore, T.W., Picard, R.W.: Towards Caring Machines. In: Dykstra-Erickson, E., Tscheligi, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 1489–1492 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blair, R.J.R.: Responding to the emotions of others: dissociating forms of empathy through the study of typical and psychiatric populations. Consciousness and Cognition 14, 698–718 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bogdan, R.J.: Interpreting Minds. MIT Press (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bosse, T., Jonker, C.M., van der Meij, L., Treur, J.: A Language and Environment for Analysis of Dynamics by Simulation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Tools 16, 435–464 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bosse, T., Jonker, C.M., Treur, J.: Formalisation of Damasio’s Theory of Emotion, Feeling and Core Consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition Journal 17, 94–113 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bosse, T., Memon, Z.A., Treur, J.: A Recursive BDI-Agent Model for Theory of Mind and its Applications. Applied Artificial Intelligence Journal 24, 953–996 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bosse, T., Memon, Z.A., Treur, J.: An Adaptive Emotion Reading Model. In: Taatgen, N.A., van Rijn, H. (eds.) Proc. of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2009, pp. 1006–1011. Cognitive Science Society, Austin (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bosse, T., Memon, Z.A., Treur, J.: A Cognitive and Neural Model for Adaptive Emotion Reading by Mirroring Preparation States and Hebbian Learning. Cognitive Systems Research Journal 12, 39–58 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Damasio, A.: The Feeling of What Happens. Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. Harcourt Brace, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Damasio, A.: Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. Vintage books, London (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Decety, J., Jackson, P.L.: The functional architecture of human empathy. Behav. Cogn. Neurosci. Rev. 3, 71–100 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    De Vignemont, F., Singer, T.: The empathic brain: how, when and why? Trends in Cogn. Science 10, 437–443 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eisenberg, N.: Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 51, 665–697 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gärdenfors, P.: How Homo Became Sapiens: on the Evolution of Thinking. Oxford University Press (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goldman, A.I.: Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading. Oxford Univ. Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goldman, A.I.: Ethics and cognitive science. Ethics 103, 337–360 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goldman, A.I.: Mirroring, Mindreading, and Simulation. In: Pineda, J.A. (ed.) Mirror Neuron Systems: The Role of Mirroring Processesi in Social Cognition, pp. 311–330. Humana Press Inc. (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goldman, A.I., Sripada, C.S.: Simulationist models of face-based emotion recognition. Cognition 94, 193–213 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gratch, J., Marsella, S., Petta, P.: Modeling the Antecedents and Consequences of Emotion. Cognitive Systems Research 10, 1–5 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J.T., Rapson, R.L.: Emotional contagion. Cambridge University Press, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hesslow, G.: Conscious thought as simulation of behavior and perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 242–247 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hoffman, M.L.: Empathy and Moral Development. Cambridge University Press, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hoffman, M.L.: Development of prosocial motivation: empathy and guilt. In: Eisenberg, N. (ed.) The Development of Prosocial Behavior, pp. 281–313. Academic Press, New York (1982)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Iacoboni, M.: Mirroring People: the New Science of How We Connect with Others. Farrar, Straus & Giroux, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Iacoboni, M.: Understanding others: imitation, language, empathy. In: Hurley, S., Chater, N. (eds.) Perspectives on Imitation: From Cognitive Neuroscience to Social Science, vol. 1, pp. 77–100. MIT Press (2005)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Iacoboni, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J.C., Rizzolatti, G.: Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biol. 3, e79 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ickes, W.: Empathic Accuracy. The Guilford Press, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ingram, R.E., Miranda, J., Segal, Z.V.: Cognitive vulnerability to depression. Guilford Press, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kim, J.: Physicalism, or Something Near Enough. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2005)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Klein, J., Moon, Y., Picard, R.: This Computer Responds to User Frustration: Theory, Design, Results, and Implications. Interacting with Computers 14, 119–140 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lamm, C., Batson, C.D., Decety, J.: The neural basis of human empathy – effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19, 42–58 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lipps, T.: Einfühlung, innere Nachahmung und Organempfindung. Archiv Für Die Gesamte Psychologie 1, 465–519 (1903)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    McQuiggan, S., Robison, J., Phillips, R., Lester, J.: Modeling Parallel and Reactive Empathy in Virtual Agents: An Inductive Approach. In: Proc. of the 7th Int. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 167–174Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Memon, Z.A., Treur, J.: Cognitive and Biological Agent Models for Emotion Reading. In: Jain, L., Gini, M., Faltings, B.B., Terano, T., Zhang, C., Cercone, N., Cao, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the 8th IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, IAT 2008, pp. 308–313. IEEE Computer Society Press (2008)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pantic, M., Rothkrantz, L.J.M.: Expert System for Automatic Analysis of Facial Expressions. Image and Vision Computing Journal 18, 881–905 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pineda, J.A. (ed.): Neuron Systems: the Role of Mirroring Processes in Social Cognition. Humana Press Inc. (2009)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Port, R.F., van Gelder, T. (eds.): Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Preston, S.D., de Waal, F.B.M.: Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav. Brain Sci. 25, 1–72 (2002)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Raine, A.: The Psychopathology of Crime: Criminal Behaviors as a Clinical Disorder. Guilford Publications, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rizzolatti, G., Craighero, L.: The mirror-neuron system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 169–192 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V.: Neuro-physiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 2, 661–670 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rizzolatti, G.: The mirror-neuron system and imitation. In: Hurley, S., Chater, N. (eds.) Perspectives on Imitation: From Cognitive Neuroscience to Social Science, vol. 1, pp. 55–76. MIT Press (2005)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rizzolatti, G., Sinigaglia, C.: Mirrors in the Brain: How Our Minds Share Actions and Emotions. Oxford Univsersity Press (2008)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Singer, T., Leiberg, S.: Sharing the Emotions of Others: The Neural Bases of Empathy. In: Gazzaniga, M.S. (ed.) The Cognitive Neurosciences, 4th edn., pp. 973–986. MIT Press (2009)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wohlschlager, A., Bekkering, H.: Is human imitation based on a mirror-neurone system? Some behavioural evidence. Exp. Brain Res. 143, 335–341 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Yang, H., Pan, Z., Zhang, M., Ju, C.: Modeling emotional action for social characters. The Knowledge Engineering Review 23, 321–337 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zulfiqar A. Memon
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jan Treur
    • 1
  1. 1.Agent Systems Research GroupVU University AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
  2. 2.Sukkur Institute of Business Administration (Sukkur IBA)SindhPakistan

Personalised recommendations