Abstract
We model lying as a communicative act changing the beliefs of the agents in a multi-agent system. With Augustine, we see lying as an utterance believed to be false by the speaker and uttered with the intent to deceive the addressee. The deceit is successful if the lie is believed after the utterance by the addressee. This is our perspective. Also, as common in dynamic epistemic logics, we model the agents addressed by the lie, but we do not (necessarily) model the speaker as one of those agents. This further simplifies the picture: we do not need to model the intention of the speaker, nor do we need to distinguish between knowledge and belief of the speaker: he is the observer of the system and his beliefs are taken to be the truth by the listeners. We provide a sketch of what goes on logically when a lie is communicated. We present a complete logic of manipulative updating, to analyse the effects of lying in public discourse. Next, we turn to the study of lying in games. First, a game-theoretical analysis is used to explain how the possibility of lying makes games such as Liar’s Dice interesting, and how lying is put to use in optimal strategies for playing the game. This is the opposite of the logical manipulative update: instead of always believing the utterance, now, it is never believed. We also give a matching logical analysis for the games perspective, and implement that in the model checker DEMO. Our running example of lying in games is the game of Liar’s Dice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Apt, K.: Logic programming. In: van Leeuwen, J. (ed.) Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, vol. B, pp. 493–574. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1990)
Arendt, H.: Truth and politics. In: Between Past and Future — Six Exercises in Political Thought. Viking Press (1967) (Penguin Classics Edition, 2006)
Augustine, S.: De Mendacio. In: Schaff, P. (ed.) A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, Eerdmans, vol. 3 (1956); translated by Rev. H. Browne (1988), http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/
Baltag, A.: A logic for suspicious players: epistemic action and belief-updates in games. Bulletin of Economic Research 54(1), 1–45 (2002)
Baltag, A., Moss, L.: Logics for epistemic programs. Synthese 139(2), 165–224 (2004)
Baltag, A., Moss, L., Solecki, S.: The logic of public announcements, common knowledge, and private suspicions. Tech. Rep. SEN-R9922, CWI, Amsterdam (1999); with many updates
Baltag, A., Moss, L., Solecki, S.: The logic of public announcements, common knowledge, and private suspicions. Tech. rep., Dept. of Cognitive Science, Indiana University and Dept. of Computing, Oxford University (2003)
Baltag, A., Smets, S.: The logic of conditional doxastic actions. In: Apt, K., van Rooij, R. (eds.) New Perspectives on Games and Interaction. Texts in Logic and Games, vol. 4. University Press, Amsterdam (2008)
van Benthem, J.: Language, logic, and communication. In: van Benthem, J., Dekker, P., van Eijck, J., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y. (eds.) Logic in Action. ILLC, pp. 7–25 (2001)
van Benthem, J.: One is a lonely number: on the logic of communication. In: Chatzidakis, Z., Koepke, P., Pohlers, W. (eds.) Logic Colloquium 2002, pp. 96–129. A.K. Peters, Wellesley (2006)
van Benthem, J., Gerbrandy, J., Kooi, B.: Dynamic update with probabilities. Studia Logica 93, 67–96 (2009)
van Benthem, J., van Eijck, J., Kooi, B.: Logics of communication and change. Information and Computation 204(11), 1620–1662 (2006)
Bok, S.: Lying — Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. The Harvester Press, Sussex (1978)
van Ditmarsch, H.: Comments on ‘the logic of conditional doxastic actions’. In: Apt, K., van Rooij, R. (eds.) New Perspectives on Games and Interaction. Texts in Logic and Games, vol. 4, pp. 33–44. Amsterdam University Press (2008)
van Ditmarsch, H.: Knowledge Games. PhD thesis, University of Groningen (2000)
van Ditmarsch, H., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic epistemic logic with assignment. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2005), pp. 141–148. ACM Inc., New York (2005)
van Eijck, J.: Guarded actions. Tech. Rep. SEN-E0425, CWI, Amsterdam (December 2004), http://repository.cwi.nl/
van Eijck, J.: DEMO — a demo of epistemic modelling. In: van Benthem, J., Gabbay, D., Löwe, B. (eds.) Interactive Logic — Proceedings of the 7th Augustus de Morgan Workshop. Texts in Logic and Games, vol. (1), pp. 305–363. Amsterdam University Press (2007)
van Eijck, J., Wang, Y.: Propositional Dynamic Logic as a Logic of Belief Revision. In: Hodges, W., de Queiroz, R. (eds.) WOLLIC 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5110, pp. 136–148. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Fagin, R., Halpern, J., Moses, Y., Vardi, M.: Reasoning about Knowledge. MIT Press (1995)
Gerbrandy, J.: Bisimulations on Planet Kripke. PhD thesis, ILLC, Amsterdam (1999)
Gerbrandy, J.: The surprise examination in dynamic epistemic logic. Synthese 155, 21–33 (2007)
Gettier, E.: Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis 23, 121–123 (1963)
Kooi, B.: Expressivity and completeness for public update logics via reduction axioms. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 16(2) (2007)
Kooi, B.P.: Knowledge, Chance, and Change. PhD thesis, Groningen University (2003)
Montague, P.: A new disinformation campaign. New York Times (April 29, 1998)
Plaza, J.A.: Logics of public communications. In: Emrich, M.L., Pfeifer, M.S., Hadzikadic, M., Ras, Z.W. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, pp. 201–216 (1989)
Renardel de Lavalette, G.: Changing modalities. Journal of Logic and Computation 14(2), 253–278 (2004)
Sakama, C., Caminada, M., Herzig, A.: A Logical Account of Lying. In: Janhunen, T., Niemelä, I. (eds.) JELIA 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6341, pp. 286–299. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Sietsma, F.: Model checking for dynamic epistemic logic with factual change. Bachelor’s Thesis, University of Amsterdam (2007)
Wang, Y.: Epistemic Modelling and Protocol Dynamics. PhD thesis, ILLC, Amsterdam (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Ditmarsch, H., van Eijck, J., Sietsma, F., Wang, Y. (2012). On the Logic of Lying. In: van Eijck, J., Verbrugge, R. (eds) Games, Actions and Social Software. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7010. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29326-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29326-9_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29325-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29326-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)