Advertisement

Mapping Possibilities of S-BPM and BPMN 2.0

Implementing a BPM Interface
  • Stephan Sneed
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 284)

Abstract

BPMN 2.0 is well on the way to becoming an international process modeling standard and will soon become the modeling method used for many process execution engines such as BPEL. Since it also provides the possibility to model distributed systems, a major concept of S-BPM, its usage is a natural step toward analyzing S-BPM and BPMN mapping possibilities. As will be demonstrated here, conformance to the BPMN 2.0 semantics as a sub class of modeling conformance can be achieved almost completely by the mapping method proposed by this paper. Those conformance deviations and losses that do occur on both sides are due solely to methodological differences discussed at the end of the paper or to be the issue of future work. The achievement of common execution conformance will not be discussed in detail here. The execution of BPMN models requires far more information than what is currently contained in most user models, as recent research has shown.

Keywords

S-BPM BPMN mapping interface model interchange 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ziemann, J., Ohren, O., Jaekel, F.-W., Kahl, T., Knothe, T.: Achieving Enterprise Interoperability Applying a Common Enterprise Metamodel. In: Doumeingts, G., et al. (eds.) Enterprise Interoperability. Springer, London (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    OMG: The BPMN specification, http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/PDF/
  3. 3.
    Fleischmann, A.: What Is S-BPM? In: Buchwald, H., Fleischmann, A., Seese, D., Stary, C. (eds.) S-BPM ONE 2009. CCIS, vol. 85, pp. 85–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fleischmann, A., et al.: Subjektorientiertes Prozessmanagement. Carl Hanser Verlag, München (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fleischmann, A.: Distributed Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Börger, E.: Approaches to Modeling Business Processes - A Critical Analysis of BPMN, Workflow Patterns and YAWL. To appear in J. Software & Systems Modeling (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meyer, N., Feiner, T., Radmayr, M., Blei, D., Fleischmann, A.: Dynamic Catenation and Execution of Cross Organisational Business Processes - The jCPEX! Approach. In: Fleischmann, A., Schmidt, W., Singer, R., Seese, D. (eds.) S-BPM ONE 2010. CCIS, vol. 138, pp. 84–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kesch, P.: Business Objects as a Mediator between Processes and Data. In: Fleischmann, A., Schmidt, W., Singer, R., Seese, D. (eds.) S-BPM ONE 2010. CCIS, vol. 138, pp. 180–191. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hohwiller, J., Schlegel, D.: Funktionale BPM Produktauswahl – Erfolgreiche BPM-Projekte durch ganzheitliche Betrachtung in OBJECTSpectrum 6/2011, SIGS DATACOM, Troisdorf (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephan Sneed
    • 1
  1. 1.Metasonic AGHettenshausenGermany

Personalised recommendations