Advertisement

ProcessWiki: A Contribution for Bridging the Last Mile Problem in Automotive Retail

  • Matthias Kurz
  • Sebastian Huber
  • Bernd Hilgarth
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 284)

Abstract

In many real-world business process management (BPM) installments, the benefit of BPM is diminished by an insufficient implementation of the to-be business processes. One of the key reasons for this problem is the complexity of classical process modeling representations that exceed the BPM knowledge of many target groups.

This contribution introduces the ProcessWiki method, which adapts the BPM 2.0 and adaptive case management (ACM) approaches. The ProcessWiki method has two primary objectives: (1) Providing a method that allows communicating business process models in a way that is easily understood by employees with little or no BPM knowledge and (2) enabling these employees to improve “their” business processes by using collaborative tools. The method was developed during a joint project with the BMW Group and is illustrated using a corresponding software solution.

Keywords

BPM BPM 2.0 ACM last-mile problem collaboration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hilgarth, B., Purucker, J., Mayer, H., Göldner, F.: ProcessSharePoint® – ein Praxisbericht zur Lösung des Last-Mile-Problems in der Prozessimplementierung. In: HMD - Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 90–99 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Freund, J., Götzer, K.: Vom Geschäftsprozess zum Workflow. Ein Leitfaden für die Praxis Hanser, München (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kurz, M., Herrmann, C.: Adaptive Case Management. Anwendung des Business Process Management 2.0-Konzepts auf wissensintensive schwach strukturierte GeschäftsprozesseGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kurz, M., Fleischmann, A.: BPM 2.0: Business Process Management Meets Empowerment. In: Fleischmann, A., Schmidt, W., Singer, R., Seese, D. (eds.) S-BPM ONE 2010. CCIS, vol. 138, pp. 54–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Billing, G., Kurz, M., Hettling, K., von Jouanne-Diedrich, H.: Applying BPM 2.0 in IT centric environments. In: Rosemann, M. (ed.) Case Studies in Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2011) (accepted paper)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Herrmann, C., Kurz, M.: Adaptive Case Management: Supporting Knowledge Intensive Processes with IT Systems. In: Schmidt, W. (ed.) S-BPM ONE 2011. CCIS, vol. 213, pp. 80–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Swenson, K.D. (ed.): Mastering the Unpredictable. How Adaptive Case Management Will Revolutionize The Way That Knowledge Workers Get Things Done. Meghan-Kiffer Press, Tampa (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kurz, M., Hermann, C.: Adaptive Case Management. Anwendung des BPM 2.0-Konzepts auf schwach strukturierte Geschäftsprozesse. In: Bartmann, D., Bodendorf, F., Ferstl, O.K., Sinz, E.J. (eds.) Dienstorientierte IT-Systeme für hochflexible Geschäftsprozesse, pp. 241–266. University of Bamberg Press, Bamberg (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kurz, M.: BPM 2.0. Selbstorganisation im Geschäftsprozessmanagement, http://www.forflex.de/uploads/AB/forflex-2011-005.pdf
  10. 10.
    Kurz, M.: BPM 2.0. Selbstorganisation im Geschäftsprozessmanagement. In: Bartmann, D., Bodendorf, F., Ferstl, O.K., Sinz, E.J. (eds.) Dienstorientierte IT-Systeme für hochflexible Geschäftsprozesse, pp. 193–216. University of Bamberg Press, Bamberg (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liebold, R., Trinczek, R.: Experteninterview. In: Kühl, S. (ed.) Handbuch Methoden der Organisationsforschung. Quantitative und qualitative Methoden, pp. 32–56. VSVerl. für Sozialwiss., Wiesbaden (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jablonski, S.: Workflow-Management-Systeme. Modellierung und Architektur. Internat. Thomson Publ., Bonn (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fleischmann, A., Stary, C.: Whom to talk to? A stakeholder perspective on business process development. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal Access in the Information Society. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Djordjevic, D., Ghani, R., Fullarton, D.: Process-centric enterprise workspace based on semantic wiki. In: International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing, KMIS 2011, pp. 224-233 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., et al.: Adaptive Workflow-On the Interplay between Flexibility and Support. In: ICEIS 1999, pp. 353–360 (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pesic, M., Schonenberg, H., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: DECLARE: Full Support for Loosely-Structured Processes. In: 11th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference EDOC 2007, p. 287 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthias Kurz
    • 1
  • Sebastian Huber
    • 1
  • Bernd Hilgarth
    • 2
  1. 1.Wirtschaftsinformatik IIUniversity of Erlangen-NurembergNurembergGermany
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science & Information SystemsUniversity of JyväskyläAgoraFinland

Personalised recommendations