Abstract
Business issues have become increasingly complex, but new methodologies have been developed to cope with high levels of complexity. For top-management consultancies, which typically are asked to solve the most pressing problems of their clients, the question arises whether these methodologies are useful in their daily work. To that end, this paper compares the ideal-typical consulting and systems-thinking approaches. Special emphasis is laid on those aspects of these approaches that afford pragmatism and applicability from a consultant’s perspective. The strengths and weaknesses of the systems-thinking approach with respect to consulting practice are identified. This specification supplies a basis for suggesting how to concretely integrate elements of the systems-thinking approach into the ideal-typical four steps in consulting projects – especially into the first steps on how to establish understanding and frame the assignment. It is shown that the systems-thinking methodology can enhance the typical course of action followed by consultants during their projects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For a detailed elaboration on the differentiation between simple, complicated and complex problems see Gomez and Probst (1997: 11–33).
- 2.
http://www.bain.com/consulting-services/index.aspx Accessed 5 February 2012.
- 3.
The simulation model was already developed prior to the project by one of the consultants as part of his dissertation, and “only” had to be customized to the client’s situation and issues. The purpose of the effort was to gain a better understanding of the effects of the liberalization of the energy market in Germany in the late 1990s and early 2000s while allowing evaluation of various alternative strategic actions for the client.
- 4.
http://www.strategydynamics.com/microworlds/ Accessed 5 February 2012.
- 5.
Rieley and Agatstein (2000) focus more on the internal background story as the main reason for the failure of a major consultancy’s system-dynamics practice, rather than looking at the problem from an angle that sheds light on external factors, such as demand by clients for relevant services.
- 6.
http://www.bain.com/about Accessed 12 May 2012.
- 7.
http://www.joinbain.com/apply-to-bain/interview-preparation/crack-the-case.asp Accessed 28 April 2012.
- 8.
The number of newly registered motorcycles is a good indicator for the number of new motorcycles sold; for the ChopCo example it can be assumed that this indicator has been developing over time also in other countries as well as in Germany.
- 9.
- 10.
The main research questions were the following: Will the classical music audience gradually die out in the coming decades? Or does the family- or work-related situation temporarily restrain younger adults from attending classical music concerts?
References
Bortz J, Döring N (2003) Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Springer, Berlin
Coyle G (2000) Qualitative and quantitative modeling in system dynamics: some research questions. Syst Dynam Rev 16(3):225–244
Coyle G (2001) Rejoinder to Homer and Oliva. Syst Dynam Rev 17(4):357–363
Diekmann A (2000) Empirische Sozialforschung – Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendungen. Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, Reinbek bei Hamburg
Gomez P, Probst G (1997) Die Praxis des ganzheitlichen Problemlösens – vernetzt denken, unternehmerisch handeln, persönlich überzeugen. Verlag Paul Haupt, Bern
Hamann TK (2005) Cultural dynamics – Zur langfristigen Existenzsicherung von Kulturorchestern in Deutschland und der Schweiz. Difo-Druck, University of St. Gallen, Bamberg (dissertation no. 2981)
Hamann TK (2011) Besuch von Konzerten klassischer Musik – eine Frage des Alters oder der Generation? In: Auhagen W, Bullerjahn C, Höge H (eds) Musikpsychologie – Musikselektion zur Identitätsstiftung und Emotionsmodulation, vol 21. Hogrefe, Göttingen, pp 119–139
High Performance Systems, Inc. (1994) STELLA II: an introduction to systems thinking. High Performance Systems, Lebanon
Homer J, Oliva R (2001) Maps and models in system dynamics: a response to Coyle. Syst Dynam Rev 17(4):347–355
Lane DC (1994) Modeling as learning: a consultancy methodology for enhancing learning in management teams. In: Morecroft JDW, Sterman JD (eds) Modeling for learning organizations. Productivity Press, Portland, pp 85–117
Oriesek DF, Schwarz JO (2008) Business wargaming – securing corporate value. Gower, Aldershot
Rieley JB, Agatstein K (2000) The rise and fall of a “favorite child” business unit at a major consulting firm. J Organ Excel 20(1):31–37
Schwaninger M (2001) System theory and cybernetics – a solid basis for transdisciplinarity in management education and research. Kybernetes 30(9/10):1209–1222
Schwaninger M, Hamann TK (2005) Theory-building with system dynamics: principles and practices. In: Díaz RM, Pichler F, Arencibia AO (eds) Computer aided systems theory – EUROCAST 2005. Springer, Berlin, pp 56–62
Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics – systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill, Boston
Vennix JAM (1996) Group model building: facilitating team learning using system dynamics. Wiley, Chichester
Wolstenholme E (1999) Qualitative vs. quantitative modeling: the evolving balance. J Operat Res Soc 50(4):422–428
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hamann, T.K. (2012). Application of Systems Thinking in Management Consulting. In: Grösser, S., Zeier, R. (eds) Systemic Management for Intelligent Organizations. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29244-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29244-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29243-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29244-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)