Skip to main content

Application of Systems Thinking in Management Consulting

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Systemic Management for Intelligent Organizations
  • 1388 Accesses

Abstract

Business issues have become increasingly complex, but new methodologies have been developed to cope with high levels of complexity. For top-management consultancies, which typically are asked to solve the most pressing problems of their clients, the question arises whether these methodologies are useful in their daily work. To that end, this paper compares the ideal-typical consulting and systems-thinking approaches. Special emphasis is laid on those aspects of these approaches that afford pragmatism and applicability from a consultant’s perspective. The strengths and weaknesses of the systems-thinking approach with respect to consulting practice are identified. This specification supplies a basis for suggesting how to concretely integrate elements of the systems-thinking approach into the ideal-typical four steps in consulting projects – especially into the first steps on how to establish understanding and frame the assignment. It is shown that the systems-thinking methodology can enhance the typical course of action followed by consultants during their projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a detailed elaboration on the differentiation between simple, complicated and complex problems see Gomez and Probst (1997: 11–33).

  2. 2.

    http://www.bain.com/consulting-services/index.aspx Accessed 5 February 2012.

  3. 3.

    The simulation model was already developed prior to the project by one of the consultants as part of his dissertation, and “only” had to be customized to the client’s situation and issues. The purpose of the effort was to gain a better understanding of the effects of the liberalization of the energy market in Germany in the late 1990s and early 2000s while allowing evaluation of various alternative strategic actions for the client.

  4. 4.

    http://www.strategydynamics.com/microworlds/ Accessed 5 February 2012.

  5. 5.

    Rieley and Agatstein (2000) focus more on the internal background story as the main reason for the failure of a major consultancy’s system-dynamics practice, rather than looking at the problem from an angle that sheds light on external factors, such as demand by clients for relevant services.

  6. 6.

    http://www.bain.com/about Accessed 12 May 2012.

  7. 7.

    http://www.joinbain.com/apply-to-bain/interview-preparation/crack-the-case.asp Accessed 28 April 2012.

  8. 8.

    The number of newly registered motorcycles is a good indicator for the number of new motorcycles sold; for the ChopCo example it can be assumed that this indicator has been developing over time also in other countries as well as in Germany.

  9. 9.

    A definition for these effects is provided by Bortz and Döring (2003) as well as by Diekmann (2000).

  10. 10.

    The main research questions were the following: Will the classical music audience gradually die out in the coming decades? Or does the family- or work-related situation temporarily restrain younger adults from attending classical music concerts?

References

  • Bortz J, Döring N (2003) Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle G (2000) Qualitative and quantitative modeling in system dynamics: some research questions. Syst Dynam Rev 16(3):225–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyle G (2001) Rejoinder to Homer and Oliva. Syst Dynam Rev 17(4):357–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann A (2000) Empirische Sozialforschung – Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendungen. Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, Reinbek bei Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez P, Probst G (1997) Die Praxis des ganzheitlichen Problemlösens – vernetzt denken, unternehmerisch handeln, persönlich überzeugen. Verlag Paul Haupt, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamann TK (2005) Cultural dynamics – Zur langfristigen Existenzsicherung von Kulturorchestern in Deutschland und der Schweiz. Difo-Druck, University of St. Gallen, Bamberg (dissertation no. 2981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamann TK (2011) Besuch von Konzerten klassischer Musik – eine Frage des Alters oder der Generation? In: Auhagen W, Bullerjahn C, Höge H (eds) Musikpsychologie – Musikselektion zur Identitätsstiftung und Emotionsmodulation, vol 21. Hogrefe, Göttingen, pp 119–139

    Google Scholar 

  • High Performance Systems, Inc. (1994) STELLA II: an introduction to systems thinking. High Performance Systems, Lebanon

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer J, Oliva R (2001) Maps and models in system dynamics: a response to Coyle. Syst Dynam Rev 17(4):347–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane DC (1994) Modeling as learning: a consultancy methodology for enhancing learning in management teams. In: Morecroft JDW, Sterman JD (eds) Modeling for learning organizations. Productivity Press, Portland, pp 85–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Oriesek DF, Schwarz JO (2008) Business wargaming – securing corporate value. Gower, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieley JB, Agatstein K (2000) The rise and fall of a “favorite child” business unit at a major consulting firm. J Organ Excel 20(1):31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger M (2001) System theory and cybernetics – a solid basis for transdisciplinarity in management education and research. Kybernetes 30(9/10):1209–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger M, Hamann TK (2005) Theory-building with system dynamics: principles and practices. In: Díaz RM, Pichler F, Arencibia AO (eds) Computer aided systems theory – EUROCAST 2005. Springer, Berlin, pp 56–62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics – systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennix JAM (1996) Group model building: facilitating team learning using system dynamics. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolstenholme E (1999) Qualitative vs. quantitative modeling: the evolving balance. J Operat Res Soc 50(4):422–428

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas K. Hamann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hamann, T.K. (2012). Application of Systems Thinking in Management Consulting. In: Grösser, S., Zeier, R. (eds) Systemic Management for Intelligent Organizations. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29244-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics