Abstract
The data integration (DI) process involves multiple users with roles such as administrators, integrators and end-users, each of whom may have requirements which have an impact on the overall quality of an integrated resource. Users’ requirements may conflict with each other, and so a quality framework for the DI context has to be capable of representing the variety of such requirements and provide mechanisms to detect and resolve the possible inconsistencies between them. This paper presents a framework for the specification of DI quality criteria and associated user requirements. This is underpinned by a Description Language formalisation with associated reasoning capabilities which enables a DI setting to be tested to identify those elements that are inconsistent with users’ requirements. The application of the framework is illustrated with an example showing how it can be used to improve the quality of an integrated resource.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Jarke, M., Vassiliou, Y.: Data warehouse quality: A review of the DWQ project. In: IQ, pp. 299–313 (1997)
Poslad, S., Zuo, L.: An adaptive semantic framework to support multiple user viewpoints over multiple databases. In: Advances in Semantic Media Adaptation and Personalization, pp. 261–284 (2008)
Wang, J.: A Quality Framework for Data Integration. Technical report, Department of Computer Science Information Systems, Birkbeck College (2010)
Wang, J.: A Framework and Architecture for Quality Assessment in Data Integration. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science Information Systems, Birkbeck College, University of London (September 2011)
Lenzerini, M.: Data integration: A theoretical perspective. In: Proc. PODS, pp. 233–246 (2002)
Halevy, A.Y.: Answering queries using views: A survey. Journal VLDB 10, 270–294 (2001)
Da Conceiao, M.B., Salgado, A.C.: Information quality measurement in data integration schemas. In: Proc. QDB (2007)
Bonifati, A.: et al. Schema mapping verification: the SPICY way. In: Proc. EDBT, pp. 85–96 (2008)
Belhajjame, K., et al.: User feedback as a first class citizen in information integration systems. In: Proc. CIDR, pp. 175–183 (2011)
Yan, L.L., et al.: Data-driven understanding and refinement of schema mappings. SIGMOD Rec. 30, 485–496 (2001)
Chiticariu, L., Tan, W.: Debugging schema mappings with routes. In: Proc. VLDB, pp. 79–90 (2006)
Calì, A., et al.: Data integration under integrity constraints. Inf. Syst. 29, 147–163 (2004)
Cabibbo, L.: On keys, foreign keys and nullable attributes in relational mapping systems. In: Proc. EDBT, pp. 263–274 (2009)
Fagin, R., et al.: Data exchange: getting to the core. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 30, 174–210 (2005)
Baader, F., et al.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications (2003)
Tsarkov, D., Horrocks, I.: Description logic reasoner: System description. In: IJCAR, pp. 292–297 (2006)
McBrien, P., Poulovassilis, A.: Data integration by bi-directional schema transformation rules. In: Proc. ICDE, pp. 227–238 (2003)
Brien, P.M., Poulovassilis, A.: A Uniform Approach to Inter-Model Transformations. In: Jarke, M., Oberweis, A. (eds.) CAiSE 1999. LNCS, vol. 1626, pp. 333–348. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Horrocks, I., Sattler, U., Tobies, S.: Practical Reasoning for Expressive Description Logics. In: Ganzinger, H., McAllester, D., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 1999. LNCS, vol. 1705, pp. 161–180. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wang, J., Martin, N., Poulovassilis, A. (2012). An Ontology-Based Quality Framework for Data Integration. In: Niedrite, L., Strazdina, R., Wangler, B. (eds) Workshops on Business Informatics Research. BIR 2011. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 106. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29231-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29231-6_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29230-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29231-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)