Skip to main content

Dealing with conflicting targets by using group decision making within PROMETHEE

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Operations Research Proceedings 2011

Part of the book series: Operations Research Proceedings ((ORP))

Abstract

This paper presents an approach to applying PROMETHEE for group decision making to support strategic decision making for the implementation of product-service systems (PSS). Such strategic decisions are not only dependent on profit but also on other economic and ecological criteria, i.e. gain or loss of knowhow and chances as well as risks concerning cooperation. Therefore, the application of a multi criteria decision support methodology is necessary, in order to include both, the provider’s and the customer’s perspective. In contrast to the application of PROMETHEE by a single decision maker, the weighting process includes the share of the vote of the different decision makers – as already shown in other approaches – as well as contrary targets of the decision makers for the defined set of criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brans, J.-P., Mareschal B.: PROMETHEE Methods. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Anlaysis, pp. 163 – 195, Springer, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brans, J.-P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B.: How to Select and how to Rank Projects: The PROMETHEE Method. Europ. J. of Operational Research 24, 228 – 238 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Geldermann, J.:Mehrzielentscheidungen in der industriellen Produktion. Universitaetsverlag, Karlsruhe (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Geldermann, J., Rentz, O.: Integrated technique assessment with imprecise information as a support for the identification of best available techniques (BAT). OR Spektrum 23 (1), 137 –157 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghafghazi, S., Sowlati, T., Sokhansanj, S., Melin, S.: A multicriteria approach to evaluate district heating system options. Applied Energy, 87 (4), 1134 – 1140 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Haralambopoulos, D.A., Polatidis, H.: Renewable energy projects: Structuring amulti-criteria group decision-making framework. Renewable Energy, 28 (6), 961 – 973 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Macharis, C., Brans, J.-P.,Mareschal, B.: The GDSS PROMETHEE Procedure. J. of Decision Systems, 7, 283 – 307 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tukker, A.: Eight types of Product-service System: Eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SUSPRONET. Bus. Strat. Env. 13, 246 – 260 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Weissfloch, U.,Mattes, K., Schroeter, M.:Multi-criteria evaluation of service-based new business concepts to increase energy efficiency in compressed air systems. Innovation for Sustainable Production 2010, Proceedings, 61 – 65, Bruges (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ute Weissfloch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Weissfloch, U., Geldermann, J. (2012). Dealing with conflicting targets by using group decision making within PROMETHEE. In: Klatte, D., Lüthi, HJ., Schmedders, K. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2011. Operations Research Proceedings. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29210-1_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics