Abstract
At the latest since the dawn and rise of globalisation, IT outsourcing and global sourcing are part of every company’s business plan and, in fact, business reality. In many ways globalisation and IT outsourcing/global sourcing are inextricably intertwined and one cannot say with certainty which trend followed which. Businesses today have been able to take advantage of technology in order to use models such as offshoring in order to reduce their costs without a corresponding decline in quality. However, concerns such as data confidentiality and security issues have emphasised the need for businesses to take considerable care when dealing with cross-border transactions. As outsourcing (offshoring) always involves companies from two jurisdictions, some knowledge of different legal regimes is required. This article examines the outsourcing model in the context of the information technology industry and looks at the most important clauses and legal issues in such contracts in the light of Indian law, Anglo-American law and German law.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Legal References
Aerotel Ltd. v. Telco Holdings Ltd., (2006) EWCA Civ 1371.
BGH NJW 77, 624
BGH NJW 83, 1489; BGH NJW 02, 749.
BGH NJW 1984, 789, 790.
BGH NJW 1985, 1769, 1771; BGH NJW 1984, 2289, 2290; BGH NJW 1983, 2493, 2494.
BGHZ 10, 16; BGH NJW 92, 3236.
BGHZ 39, 283.
BGHZ 102, 135
British Sugar plc v. NEI Power Projects Ltd (1997) C.L.C. 622 (Q.B.D.).
British Westinghouse Electric Co. Ltd. v. Underground Electric Railways Co. of London Ltd., (1912) A.C. 673, 689.
Copyright Act, 1957, §§ 18-19
Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, §§ 77-89.
Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, § 90(3). (U.K.)
Council Directive 2004/39/EC, art. 13(5), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/consleg/2004/L/02004L0039-20060428-en.pdf (the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, which came into force on November 1, 2007, replacing the existing Investment Services Directive). See also Financial Services Authority, SYSC Senior Management Arrangements, Systems and Controls 13.9, http://www.ukregulation.co.uk/topics/FSAH_SYSC_13_9_Outsourcing/48714.
§§ 434, 435, 437, 633 German Civil Code - BGB.
Hadley v. Baxendale (1854) 9 Ex. 341, 355.
Indian Contract Act, § 124.
Indian Contract Act, 1872, § 73.
Indian Contract Act, 1872, § 73, Explanation; Murlidhar Chiranjilal v. Harishchandra Dwarkadas, A.I.R. 1962 S.C. 366.
Indian Contract Act, 1872, § 74.
Microsoft Corporation v. Deepak Raval, [2006 (33) PTC 122 (Del).] [Id. at 3174.
OLG Koeln NJW-RR 1993, 1528.
OLG Frankfurt VersR 1981, 27, 30; BGH VersR 1970, 568, 569; BAG NJW 1982, 1013.
Patents Act, (1970), § 3(k)-(ka).
Sale of Goods Act, 1930, § 16.
Sale of Goods Act, 1979, § 14.
Supply of Goods and Services Act, 1982, § 13.
Surrey County Council v. Bredero Homes Ltd., [1992] 1 W.L.R. 1361, applying Robinson v. Harman, (1843-60) All E.R. Rep. 383.
Transfer of Undertaking (Protection of Employment) Regulations, 2006, § 4-7.
Unfair Contract Terms Act, 1977, § 2(1), 6(1).
Unfair Contract Terms Act, 1977, § 26.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bäumer, U., Mara, P. (2012). Legal Framework of IT Outsourcing and Global Sourcing: A Comparative Approach from the Indian, Anglo/American and German Legal Perspective. In: Bäumer, U., Kreutter, P., Messner, W. (eds) Globalization of Professional Services. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29181-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29181-4_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29180-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29181-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)