Skip to main content

Aesthetic 3D Model Evolution

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7247))

Abstract

Recently, evolutionary art has been exploring the use of mathematical models of aesthetics, with the goal of automatically evolving aesthetically pleasing images. This paper investigates the application of similar models of aesthetics towards the evolution of 3-dimensional structures. We extend existing models of aesthetics used for image evaluation to the 3D realm, by considering quantifiable properties of surface geometry. Analyses used include entropy, complexity, deviation from normality, 1/f noise, and symmetry. A new 3D L-system implementation promotes accurate analyses of surface features, as well as productive rule sets when used with genetic programming. Multi-objective evaluation reconciles multiple aesthetic criteria. Experiments resulted in the generation of many models that satisfied multiple criteria. A human survey was conducted, and survey takers showed a clear preference for high-fitness highly-evolved models over low-fitness unevolved ones. This research shows that aesthetic evolution of 3D structures is a promising new research area for evolutionary art.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bentley, P., Corne, D.: Creative Evolutionary Systems. Morgan Kaufmann (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bentley, P., Wakefield, J.: Finding acceptable solutions in the pareto-optimal range using multiobjective genetic algorithms. In: Soft Computing in Engineering Design and Manufacturing. Springer (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bergen, S.: Automatic Structure Generation Using Genetic Programming and Fractal Geometry. Master’s thesis, Department of Computer Science, Brock University (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bergen, S.: Aesthetic 3D Model Evolution Gallery (2012), www.cosc.brocku.ca/~bross/Aesth3Dmodels/

  5. Bergen, S., Ross, B.: Evolutionary Art Using Summed Multi-objective Ranks. In: Genetic Programming - Theory and Practice VIII, pp. 227–244. Springer (May 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Birkhoff, G.D.: Aesthetic Measure. Harvard University Press (1933)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blender: Blender, http://www.blender.org/ (last accessed December 4, 2011)

  8. von Buelow, P.: Genetically Engineered Architecture - Design Exploration with Evolutionary Computation. VDM Verlag (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coello, C.C., Lamont, G., Veldhuizen, D.V.: Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems, 2nd edn. Kluwer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coia, C., Ross, B.: Automatic Evolution of Conceptual Building Architectures. In: Proc. CEC 2011. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Greenfield, G.: Evolving aesthetic images using multiobjective optimization. In: Proc. CEC 2003, pp. 1903–1909 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gunlu, G., Bilge, H.: Symmetry analysis for 2D images by using DCT coefficients. In: ICSCCW, pp. 1–4 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. den Heijer, E., Eiben, A.: Comparing Aesthetic Measures for Evolutionary Art. In: Di Chio, C., Brabazon, A., Di Caro, G.A., Ebner, M., Farooq, M., Fink, A., Grahl, J., Greenfield, G., Machado, P., O’Neill, M., Tarantino, E., Urquhart, N. (eds.) EvoApplications 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6025, pp. 311–320. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Hemberg, M., O’Reilly, U.M.: GENR8 - using grammatical evolution in A surface design tool. In: Barry, A.M. (ed.) GECCO 2002: Proceedings of the Bird of a Feather Workshops, pp. 120–123. AAAI, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hemberg, M., O’Reilly, U.M., Menges, A., Jones, K., da Costa Goncalves, M., Fuchs, S.R.: Genr8: Architects’ experience with an emergent design tool. In: The Art of Artificial Evolution. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jacob, C.: Illustrating evolutionary computation with Mathematica. Morgan Kaufmann (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jacob, C., Lindenmayer, A., Rozenberg, G.: Genetic L-System Programming. In: Davidor, Y., Männer, R., Schwefel, H.-P. (eds.) PPSN 1994. LNCS, vol. 866, pp. 334–343. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kazhdan, M., Chazelle, B., Dobkin, D., Funkhouser, T., Rusinkiewicz, S.: A reflective symmetry descriptor for 3d models (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li, M., Vitanyi, P.: An introduction to kolmogorov complexity and its applications: Preface to the first edition (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lipson, H., Cochran, W.: The determination of crystal structures - 3rd revised and enlarged ed. Cornell University Press (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lorensen, W.E., Cline, H.E.: Marching cubes: A high resolution 3d surface construction algorithm. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 21, 163–169 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Luke, S.: Ecj, http://cs.gmu.edu/~eclab/projects/ecj/ (last accessed December 3, 2011)

  23. Machado, P., Cardoso, A.: Computing Aesthetics. In: de Oliveira, F.M. (ed.) SBIA 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1515, pp. 219–228. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Milotti, E.: 1/f noise: a pedagogical review. arxiv preprint, physics/0204033 (April 2002), http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0204033

  25. Neufeld, C., Ross, B., Ralph, W.: The Evolution of Artistic Filters. In: Romero, J., Machado, P. (eds.) The Art of Artificial Evolution. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. O’Neill, M., Brabazon, A.: Evolving a logo design using lindenmayer systems. In: Evolutionary Computation, pp. 3788–3794 (June 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. O’Neill, M., McDermott, J., Swafford, J., Byrne, J., Hemberg, E., Brabazon, A.: Evolutionary design using grammatical evolution and shape grammars: designing a shelter. Intl. Journal of Design Engineering 3, 4–24 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. O’Neill, M., Swafford, J., McDermott, J., Byrne, J., Brabazon, A., Shotton, E., McNally, C., Hemberg, M.: Shape grammars and grammatical evolution for evolutionary design. In: Proc. GECCO 2009, pp. 1035–1042. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pang, W., Hui, K.: Interactive evolutionary 3d fractal modeling. The Visual Computer 26, 1467–1483 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rigau, J., Feixas, M., Sbert, M.: Conceptualizing Birkhoff’s Aesthetic Measure Using Shannon Entropy and Kolmogorov Complexity. In: Proc. Eurographics Workshop Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging, pp. 105–112 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ross, B., Ralph, W., Zong, H.: Evolutionary Image Synthesis Using a Model of Aesthetics. In: CEC 2006 (July 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sims, K.: Evolving Virtual Creatures. In: SIGGRAPH 1994, pp. 15–22 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Spehar, B., Clifford, C., Newell, B., Taylor, R.: Universal aesthetic of fractals. Computer and Graphics 27, 813–820 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Stiny, G.: Introduction to shape and shape grammars. Environment and Planning B 7, 343–351 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Svangård, N., Nordin, P.: Automated Aesthetic Selection of Evolutionary Art by Distance Based Classification of Genomes and Phenomes Using the Universal Similarity Metric. In: Raidl, G.R., Cagnoni, S., Branke, J., Corne, D.W., Drechsler, R., Jin, Y., Johnson, C.G., Machado, P., Marchiori, E., Rothlauf, F., Smith, G.D., Squillero, G. (eds.) EvoWorkshops 2004. LNCS, vol. 3005, pp. 447–456. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Todd, S., Latham, W.: Evolutionary Art and Computers. Academic Press (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wackerly, D.D., Mendenhall III, W., Scheaffer, R.L.: Mathematical Statistics with Applications, 6th edn. Duxbury Advanced Series (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Walsh, P., Gade, P.: The use of an aesthetic measure for the evolution of fractal landscapes. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1613–1619. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Watt, A., Policarpo, F.: The Computer Image. Addison Wesley (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bergen, S., Ross, B.J. (2012). Aesthetic 3D Model Evolution. In: Machado, P., Romero, J., Carballal, A. (eds) Evolutionary and Biologically Inspired Music, Sound, Art and Design. EvoMUSART 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7247. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29142-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29142-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29141-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29142-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics