Abstract
Let me start with a recollection of my first acquaintance with Prof. Lotfi Zadeh. It was in 2001 in Villa Real, Portugal, where Prof. Pedro Melo-Pinto organized a school on fuzzy sets. Prof. Zadeh was invited for a 3-hour lecture, which he concluded with presentation of slides with articles by Samuel Kleene, Kurt Gödel and other luminaries of mathematical logic, who have written against the fuzzy sets. The fact that the sublime mathematician and logician Gödel had sometimes made slips in his judgments can be confirmed by the cosmologists, yet I was astonished by his opinion. Of course, nowadays, when we are aware of the enormous number of publications in the field of fuzzy sets, as well as of the various impressive applications of these, it is easy to say that Gödel had mistaken. However, I have been long tormented by the question why these mathematicians had opposed the fuzzy sets while they did not have anything against the three- and multi-valued logics of Jan Lukasiewicz. Thus I reached the conclusion that the reason for the then negative attitude towards fuzzy sets was hidden in the presence of the [0, 1] interval as the set of the fuzzy sets’ membership function (see, e.g, [301, 592, 593]).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Atanassov, K.T. (2012). Concluding Remarks. In: On Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets Theory. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 283. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29127-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29127-2_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29126-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29127-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)