Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Planning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Experimentation in Software Engineering

Abstract

After the scoping of the experiment, the planning takes place. The scoping determines the foundation for the experiment – why the experiment is conducted – while the planning prepares for how the experiment is conducted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anastas, J.W., MacDonald, M.L.: Research Design for the Social Work and the Human Services, 2nd edn. Columbia University Press, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson, C., Runeson, P.: A spiral process model for case studies on software quality monitoring – method and metrics. Softw. Process: Improv. Pract. 12(2), 125–140 (2007). doi: 10.1002/spip.311

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andrews, A.A., Pradhan, A.S.: Ethical issues in empirical software engineering: the limits of policy. Empir. Softw. Eng. 6(2), 105–110 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. American Psychological Association: Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Am. Psychol. 47, 1597–1611 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Avison, D., Baskerville, R., Myers, M.: Controlling action research projects. Inf. Technol. People 14(1), 28–45 (2001). doi: 10.1108/09593840110384762. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/09593840110384762

    Google Scholar 

  6. Babbie, E.R.: Survey Research Methods. Wadsworth, Belmont (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Basili, V.R.: Quantitative evaluation of software engineering methodology. In: Proceedings of the First Pan Pacific Computer Conference, vol. 1, pp. 379–398. Australian Computer Society, Melbourne (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Basili, V.R.: Software development: a paradigm for the future. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference, COMPSAC’89, Orlando, pp. 471–485. IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Basili, V.R.: The experimental paradigm in software engineering. In: H.D. Rombach, V.R. Basili, R.W. Selby (eds.) Experimental Software Engineering Issues: Critical Assessment and Future Directives. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 706. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Basili, V.R.: Evolving and packaging reading technologies. J. Syst. Softw. 38(1), 3–12 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Basili, V.R., Weiss, D.M.: A methodology for collecting valid software engineering data. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 10(6), 728–737 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Basili, V.R., Selby, R.W.: Comparing the effectiveness of software testing strategies. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 13(12), 1278–1298 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Basili, V.R., Rombach, H.D.: The TAME project: towards improvement-oriented software environments. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 14(6), 758–773 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Basili, V.R., Green, S.: Software process evaluation at the SEL. IEEE Softw. 11(4), pp. 58–66 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Basili, V.R., Selby, R.W., Hutchens, D.H.: Experimentation in software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 12(7), 733–743 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Basili, V.R., Caldiera, G., Rombach, H.D.: Experience factory. In: J.J. Marciniak (ed.) Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, pp. 469–476. Wiley, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Basili, V.R., Caldiera, G., Rombach, H.D.: Goal Question Metrics paradigm. In: J.J. Marciniak (ed.) Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, pp. 528–532. Wiley (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Basili, V.R., Green, S., Laitenberger, O., Lanubile, F., Shull, F., Sørumgård, S., Zelkowitz, M.V.: The empirical investigation of perspective-based reading. Empir. Soft. Eng. 1(2), 133–164 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Basili, V.R., Green, S., Laitenberger, O., Lanubile, F., Shull, F., Sørumgård, S., Zelkowitz, M.V.: Lab package for the empirical investigation of perspective-based reading. Technical report, Univeristy of Maryland (1998). http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/SoftEng/ESEG/manual/pbr_package/manual.html

  20. Basili, V.R., Shull, F., Lanubile, F.: Building knowledge through families of experiments. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 25(4), 456–473 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Baskerville, R.L., Wood-Harper, A.T.: A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. J. Inf. Technol. 11(3), 235–246 (1996). doi: 10.1080/026839696345289

    Google Scholar 

  22. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.K., Mead, M.: The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Q. 11(3), 369 (1987). doi: 10.2307/248684

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bergman, B., Klefsjö, B.: Quality from Customer Needs to Customer Satisfaction. Studentlitteratur, Lund (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B.A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Khalil, M.: Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. J. Syst. Softw. 80(4), 571–583 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.009

    Google Scholar 

  25. Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B.A., Budgen, D.: Using a protocol template for case study planning. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. University of Bari, Italy (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Briand, L.C., Differding, C.M., Rombach, H.D.: Practical guidelines for measurement-based process improvement. Softw. Process: Improv. Pract. 2(4), 253–280 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Briand, L.C., El Emam, K., Morasca, S.: On the application of measurement theory in software engineering. Empir. Softw. Eng. 1(1), 61–88 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Briand, L.C., Bunse, C., Daly, J.W.: A controlled experiment for evaluating quality guidelines on the maintainability of object-oriented designs. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 27(6), 513–530 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  29. British Psychological Society: Ethical principles for conducting research with human participants. Psychologist 6(1), 33–35 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Budgen, D., Kitchenham, B.A., Charters, S., Turner, M., Brereton, P., Linkman, S.: Presenting software engineering results using structured abstracts: a randomised experiment. Empir. Softw. Eng. 13, 435–468 (2008). doi: 10.1007/s10664-008-9075-7

    Google Scholar 

  31. Budgen, D., Burn, A.J., Kitchenham, B.A.: Reporting computing projects through structured abstracts: a quasi-experiment. Empir. Softw. Eng. 16(2), 244–277 (2011). doi: 10.1007/s10664-010-9139-3

    Google Scholar 

  32. Campbell, D.T., Stanley, J.C.: Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chrissis, M.B., Konrad, M., Shrum, S.: CMMI(R): Guidelines for process integration and product improvement. Technical report, SEI (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ciolkowski, M., Differding, C.M., Laitenberger, O., Münch, J.: Empirical investigation of perspective-based reading: A replicated experiment. Technical report, 97-13, ISERN (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Coad, P., Yourdon, E.: Object-Oriented Design, 1st edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cohen, J.: Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol. Bull. 70, 213–220 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cook, T.D., Campbell, D.T.: Quasi-experimentation – Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Corbin, J., Strauss, A.: Basics of Qualitative Research, 3rd edn. SAGE, Los Angeles (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cruzes, D.S., Dybå, T.: Research synthesis in software engineering: a tertiary study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 53(5), 440–455 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2011.01.004

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dalkey, N., Helmer, O.: An experimental application of the delphi method to the use of experts. Manag. Sci. 9(3), 458–467 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  41. DeMarco, T.: Controlling Software Projects. Yourdon Press, New York (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Demming, W.E.: Out of the Crisis. MIT Centre for Advanced Engineering Study, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dieste, O., Grimán, A., Juristo, N.: Developing search strategies for detecting relevant experiments. Empir. Softw. Eng. 14, 513–539 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10664-008-9091-7

  44. Dittrich, Y., Rönkkö, K., Eriksson, J., Hansson, C., Lindeberg, O.: Cooperative method development. Empir. Softw. Eng. 13(3), 231–260 (2007). doi: 10.1007/s10664-007-9057-1

    Google Scholar 

  45. Doolan, E.P.: Experiences with Fagan’s inspection method. Softw. Pract. Exp. 22(2), 173–182 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Dybå, T., Dingsøyr, T.: Empirical studies of agile software development: a systematic review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 50(9-10), 833–859 (2008). doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006

    Google Scholar 

  47. Dybå, T., Dingsøyr, T.: Strength of evidence in systematic reviews in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM ’08, Kaiserslautern, pp. 178–187. ACM, New York (2008). doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1414004.1414034

  48. Dybå, T., Kitchenham, B.A., Jørgensen, M.: Evidence-based software engineering for practitioners. IEEE Softw. 22, 58–65 (2005). doi: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MS.2005.6

    Google Scholar 

  49. Dybå, T., Kampenes, V.B., Sjøberg, D.I.K.: A systematic review of statistical power in software engineering experiments. Inf. Softw. Technol. 48(8), 745–755 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2005.08.009

    Google Scholar 

  50. Easterbrook, S., Singer, J., Storey, M.-A., Damian, D.: Selecting empirical methods for software engineering research. In: F. Shull, J. Singer, D.I. Sjøberg (eds.) Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering. Springer, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Eick, S.G., Loader, C.R., Long, M.D., Votta, L.G., Vander Wiel, S.A.: Estimating software fault content before coding. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Software Engineering, Melbourne, pp. 59–65. ACM Press, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14(4), 532 (1989). doi: 10.2307/258557

    Google Scholar 

  53. Endres, A., Rombach, H.D.: A Handbook of Software and Systems Engineering – Empirical Observations, Laws and Theories. Pearson Addison-Wesley, Harlow/New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Fagan, M.E.: Design and code inspections to reduce errors in program development. IBM Syst. J. 15(3), 182–211 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Fenton, N.: Software measurement: A necessary scientific basis. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 3(20), 199–206 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Fenton, N., Pfleeger, S.L.: Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach, 2nd edn. International Thomson Computer Press, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Fenton, N., Pfleeger, S.L., Glass, R.: Science and substance: A challenge to software engineers. IEEE Softw. 11, 86–95 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Fink, A.: The Survey Handbook, 2nd edn. SAGE, Thousand Oaks/London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Flyvbjerg, B.: Five misunderstandings about case-study research. In: Qualitative Research Practice, concise paperback edn., pp. 390–404. SAGE, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Frigge, M., Hoaglin, D.C., Iglewicz, B.: Some implementations of the boxplot. Am. Stat. 43(1), 50–54 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Fusaro, P., Lanubile, F., Visaggio, G.: A replicated experiment to assess requirements inspection techniques. Empir. Softw. Eng. 2(1), 39–57 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Glass, R.L.: The software research crisis. IEEE Softw. 11, 42–47 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Glass, R.L., Vessey, I., Ramesh, V.: Research in software engineering: An analysis of the literature. Inf. Softw. Technol. 44(8), 491–506 (2002). doi: 10.1016/S0950-5849(02)00049-6

    Google Scholar 

  64. Gómez, O.S., Juristo, N., Vegas, S.: Replication types in experimental disciplines. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, Bolzano-Bozen (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Gorschek, T., Wohlin, C.: Requirements abstraction model. Requir. Eng. 11, 79–101 (2006). doi: 10.1007/s00766-005-0020-7

    Google Scholar 

  66. Gorschek, T., Garre, P., Larsson, S., Wohlin, C.: A model for technology transfer in practice. IEEE Softw. 23(6), 88–95 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Gorschek, T., Garre, P., Larsson, S., Wohlin, C.: Industry evaluation of the requirements abstraction model. Requir. Eng. 12, 163–190 (2007). doi: 10.1007/s00766-007-0047-z

    Google Scholar 

  68. Grady, R.B., Caswell, D.L.: Software Metrics: Establishing a Company-Wide Program. Prentice-Hall, Englewood (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Grant, E.E., Sackman, H.: An exploratory investigation of programmer performance under on-line and off-line conditions. IEEE Trans. Human Factor Electron. HFE-8(1), 33–48 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Gregor, S.: The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Q. 30(3), 491–506 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Hall, T., Flynn, V.: Ethical issues in software engineering research: a survey of current practice. Empir. Softw. Eng. 6, 305–317 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Hannay, J.E., Sjøberg, D.I.K., Dybå, T.: A systematic review of theory use in software engineering experiments. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 33(2), 87–107 (2007). doi: 10.1109/TSE.2007.12

    Google Scholar 

  73. Hannay, J.E., Dybå, T., Arisholm, E., Sjøberg, D.I.K.: The effectiveness of pair programming: a meta-analysis. Inf. Softw. Technol. 51(7), 1110–1122 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2009.02.001

    Google Scholar 

  74. Hayes, W.: Research synthesis in software engineering: a case for meta-analysis. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Software Metrics Symposium, Boca Raton, pp. 143–151 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Hetzel, B.: Making Software Measurement Work: Building an Effective Measurement Program. Wiley, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  77. Höst, M., Regnell, B., Wohlin, C.: Using students as subjects – a comparative study of students and professionals in lead-time impact assessment. Empir. Softw. Eng. 5(3), 201–214 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  78. Höst, M., Wohlin, C., Thelin, T.: Experimental context classification: Incentives and experience of subjects. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, St. Louis, pp. 470–478 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Höst, M., Runeson, P.: Checklists for software engineering case study research. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, Madrid, pp. 479–481 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  80. Hove, S.E., Anda, B.: Experiences from conducting semi-structured interviews in empirical software engineering research. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium, pp. 1–10. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  81. Humphrey, W.S.: Managing the Software Process. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  82. Humphrey, W.S.: A Discipline for Software Engineering. Addison Wesley, Reading (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  83. Humphrey, W.S.: Introduction to the Personal Software Process. Addison Wesley, Reading (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  84. IEEE: IEEE standard glossary of software engineering terminology. Technical Report, IEEE Std 610.12-1990, IEEE (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  85. Iversen, J.H., Mathiassen, L., Nielsen, P.A.: Managing risk in software process improvement: an action research approach. MIS Q. 28(3), 395–433 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  86. Jedlitschka, A., Pfahl, D.: Reporting guidelines for controlled experiments in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, Noosa Heads, pp. 95–104 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  87. Johnson, P.M., Tjahjono, D.: Does every inspection really need a meeting? Empir. Softw. Eng. 3(1), 9–35 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  88. Juristo, N., Moreno, A.M.: Basics of Software Engineering Experimentation. Springer, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  89. Juristo, N., Vegas, S.: The role of non-exact replications in software engineering experiments. Empir. Softw. Eng. 16, 295–324 (2011). doi: 10.1007/s10664-010-9141-9

    Google Scholar 

  90. Kachigan, S.K.: Statistical Analysis: An Interdisciplinary Introduction to Univariate and Multivariate Methods. Radius Press, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  91. Kachigan, S.K.: Multivariate Statistical Analysis: A Conceptual Introduction, 2nd edn. Radius Press, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  92. Kampenes, V.B., Dyba, T., Hannay, J.E., Sjø berg, D.I.K.: A systematic review of effect size in software engineering experiments. Inf. Softw. Technol. 49(11–12), 1073–1086 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.015

    Google Scholar 

  93. Karahasanović, A., Anda, B., Arisholm, E., Hove, S.E., Jørgensen, M., Sjøberg, D., Welland, R.: Collecting feedback during software engineering experiments. Empir. Softw. Eng. 10(2), 113–147 (2005). doi: 10.1007/s10664-004-6189-4. http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10664-004-6189-4

  94. Karlström, D., Runeson, P., Wohlin, C.: Aggregating viewpoints for strategic software process improvement. IEE Proc. Softw. 149(5), 143–152 (2002). doi: 10.1049/ip-sen:20020696

    Google Scholar 

  95. Kitchenham, B.A.: The role of replications in empirical software engineering – a word of warning. Empir. Softw. Eng. 13, 219–221 (2008). 10.1007/s10664-008-9061-0

  96. Kitchenham, B.A., Charters, S.: Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (version 2.3). Technical Report, EBSE Technical Report EBSE-2007-01, Keele University and Durham University (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  97. Kitchenham, B.A., Pickard, L.M., Pfleeger, S.L.: Case studies for method and tool evaluation. IEEE Softw. 12(4), 52–62 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  98. Kitchenham, B.A., Pfleeger, S.L., Pickard, L.M., Jones, P.W., Hoaglin, D.C., El Emam, K., Rosenberg, J.: Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 28(8), 721–734 (2002). doi: 10.1109/TSE.2002.1027796. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=1027796

  99. Kitchenham, B., Fry, J., Linkman, S.G.: The case against cross-over designs in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice, Amsterdam, pp. 65–67. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  100. Kitchenham, B.A., Dybå, T., Jørgensen, M.: Evidence-based software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering, Edinburgh, pp. 273–281 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  101. Kitchenham, B.A., Al-Khilidar, H., Babar, M.A., Berry, M., Cox, K., Keung, J., Kurniawati, F., Staples, M., Zhang, H., Zhu, L.: Evaluating guidelines for reporting empirical software engineering studies. Empir. Softw. Eng. 13(1), 97–121 (2007). doi: 10.1007/s10664-007-9053-5. http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10664-007-9053-5

  102. Kitchenham, B.A., Jeffery, D.R., Connaughton, C.: Misleading metrics and unsound analyses. IEEE Softw. 24, 73–78 (2007). doi: 10.1109/MS.2007.49

    Google Scholar 

  103. Kitchenham, B.A., Brereton, P., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., Linkman, S.G.: Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – a systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 51(1), 7–15 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009. http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009

  104. Kitchenham, B.A., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D., Brereton, P., Turner, M., Niazi, M., Linkman, S.: Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – a tertiary study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 52(8), 792–805 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2010.03.006

    Google Scholar 

  105. Kitchenham, B.A., Sjøberg, D.I.K., Brereton, P., Budgen, D., Dybå, T., Höst, M., Pfahl, D., Runeson, P.: Can we evaluate the quality of software engineering experiments? In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. ACM, Bolzano/Bozen (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  106. Kitchenham, B.A., Budgen, D., Brereton, P.: Using mapping studies as the basis for further research – a participant-observer case study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 53(6), 638–651 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2010.12.011

    Google Scholar 

  107. Laitenberger, O., Atkinson, C., Schlich, M., El Emam, K.: An experimental comparison of reading techniques for defect detection in UML design documents. J. Syst. Softw. 53(2), 183–204 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  108. Larsson, R.: Case survey methodology: quantitative analysis of patterns across case studies. Acad. Manag. J. 36(6), 1515–1546 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  109. Lee, A.S.: A scientific methodology for MIS case studies. MIS Q. 13(1), 33 (1989). doi: 10.2307/248698. http://www.jstor.org/stable/248698?origin=crossref

  110. Lehman, M.M.: Program, life-cycles and the laws of software evolution. Proc. IEEE 68(9), 1060–1076 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  111. Lethbridge, T.C., Sim, S.E., Singer, J.: Studying software engineers: data collection techniques for software field studies. Empir. Softw. Eng. 10, 311–341 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  112. Linger, R.: Cleanroom process model. IEEE Softw. pp. 50–58 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  113. Linkman, S., Rombach, H.D.: Experimentation as a vehicle for software technology transfer – a family of software reading techniques. Inf. Softw. Technol. 39(11), 777–780 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  114. Lucas, W.A.: The case survey method: aggregating case experience. Technical Report, R-1515-RC, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  115. Lucas, H.C., Kaplan, R.B.: A structured programming experiment. Comput. J. 19(2), 136–138 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  116. Lyu, M.R. (ed.): Handbook of Software Reliability Engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  117. Maldonado, J.C., Carver, J., Shull, F., Fabbri, S., Dória, E., Martimiano, L., Mendonça, M., Basili, V.: Perspective-based reading: a replicated experiment focused on individual reviewer effectiveness. Empir. Softw. Eng. 11, 119–142 (2006). doi: 10.1007/s10664-006-5967-6

    Google Scholar 

  118. Manly, B.F.J.: Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  119. Marascuilo, L.A., Serlin, R.C.: Statistical Methods for the Social and Behavioral Sciences. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  120. Miller, J.: Estimating the number of remaining defects after inspection. Softw. Test. Verif. Reliab. 9(4), 167–189 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  121. Miller, J.: Applying meta-analytical procedures to software engineering experiments. J. Syst. Softw. 54(1), 29–39 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  122. Miller, J.: Statistical significance testing: a panacea for software technology experiments? J. Syst. Softw. 73, 183–192 (2004). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2003.12.019

  123. Miller, J.: Replicating software engineering experiments: a poisoned chalice or the holy grail. Inf. Softw. Technol. 47(4), 233–244 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  124. Miller, J., Wood, M., Roper, M.: Further experiences with scenarios and checklists. Empir. Softw. Eng. 3(1), 37–64 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  125. Montgomery, D.C.: Design and Analysis of Experiments, 5th edn. Wiley, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  126. Myers, G.J.: A controlled experiment in program testing and code walkthroughs/inspections. Commun. ACM 21, 760–768 (1978). doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/359588.359602

  127. Noblit, G.W., Hare, R.D.: Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Sage Publications, Newbury Park (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  128. Ohlsson, M.C., Wohlin, C.: A project effort estimation study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 40(14), 831–839 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  129. Owen, S., Brereton, P., Budgen, D.: Protocol analysis: a neglected practice. Commun. ACM 49(2), 117–122 (2006). doi: 10.1145/1113034.1113039

    Google Scholar 

  130. Paulk, M.C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B., Weber, C.V.: Capability maturity model for software. Technical Report, CMU/SEI-93-TR-24, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  131. Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., Mattsson, M.: Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWIC). BCS, University of Bari, Italy (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  132. Petersen, K., Wohlin, C.: Context in industrial software engineering research. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, Lake Buena Vista, pp. 401–404 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  133. Pfleeger, S.L.: Experimental design and analysis in software engineering part 1–5. ACM Sigsoft, Softw. Eng. Notes, 19(4), 16–20; 20(1), 22–26; 20(2), 14–16; 20(3), 13–15; 20, (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  134. Pfleeger, S.L., Atlee, J.M.: Software Engineering: Theory and Practice, 4th edn. Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  135. Pickard, L.M., Kitchenham, B.A., Jones, P.W.: Combining empirical results in software engineering. Inf. Softw. Technol. 40(14), 811–821 (1998). doi: 10.1016/S0950-5849(98)00101-3

    Google Scholar 

  136. Porter, A.A., Votta, L.G.: An experiment to assess different defect detection methods for software requirements inspections. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Software Engineering, Sorrento, pp. 103–112 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  137. Porter, A.A., Votta, L.G.: Comparing detection methods for software requirements inspection: a replicated experiment. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 21(6), 563–575 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  138. Porter, A.A., Votta, L.G.: Comparing detection methods for software requirements inspection: a replicated experimentation: a replication using professional subjects. Empir. Softw. Eng. 3(4), 355–380 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  139. Porter, A.A., Siy, H.P., Toman, C.A., Votta, L.G.: An experiment to assess the cost-benefits of code inspections in large scale software development. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 23(6), 329–346 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  140. Potts, C.: Software engineering research revisited. IEEE Softw. pp. 19–28 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  141. Rainer, A.W.: The longitudinal, chronological case study research strategy: a definition, and an example from IBM Hursley Park. Inf. Softw. Technol. 53(7), 730–746 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  142. Robinson, H., Segal, J., Sharp, H.: Ethnographically-informed empirical studies of software practice. Inf. Softw. Technol. 49(6), 540–551 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.007

    Google Scholar 

  143. Robson, C.: Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioners-Researchers, 1st edn. Blackwell, Oxford/Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  144. Robson, C.: Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioners-Researchers, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford/Madden (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  145. Runeson, P., Skoglund, M.: Reference-based search strategies in systematic reviews. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Empirical Assessment and Evaluation in Software Engineering. Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWIC). BCS, Durham University, UK (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  146. Runeson, P., Höst, M., Rainer, A.W., Regnell, B.: Case Study Research in Software Engineering. Guidelines and Examples. Wiley, Hoboken (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  147. Sandahl, K., Blomkvist, O., Karlsson, J., Krysander, C., Lindvall, M., Ohlsson, N.: An extended replication of an experiment for assessing methods for software requirements. Empir. Softw. Eng. 3(4), 381–406 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  148. Seaman, C.B.: Qualitative methods in empirical studies of software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 25(4), 557–572 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  149. Selby, R.W., Basili, V.R., Baker, F.T.: Cleanroom software development: An empirical evaluation. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 13(9), 1027–1037 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  150. Shepperd, M.: Foundations of Software Measurement. Prentice-Hall, London/New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  151. Shneiderman, B., Mayer, R., McKay, D., Heller, P.: Experimental investigations of the utility of detailed flowcharts in programming. Commun. ACM 20, 373–381 (1977). doi: 10.1145/359605.359610

    Google Scholar 

  152. Shull, F.: Developing techniques for using software documents: a series of empirical studies. Ph.D. thesis, Computer Science Department, University of Maryland, USA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  153. Shull, F., Basili, V.R., Carver, J., Maldonado, J.C., Travassos, G.H., Mendonça, M.G., Fabbri, S.: Replicating software engineering experiments: addressing the tacit knowledge problem. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, Nara, pp. 7–16 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  154. Shull, F., Mendoncça, M.G., Basili, V.R., Carver, J., Maldonado, J.C., Fabbri, S., Travassos, G.H., Ferreira, M.C.: Knowledge-sharing issues in experimental software engineering. Empir. Softw. Eng. 9, 111–137 (2004). doi: 10.1023/B:EMSE.0000013516.80487.33

    Google Scholar 

  155. Shull, F., Carver, J., Vegas, S., Juristo, N.: The role of replications in empirical software engineering. Empir. Softw. Eng. 13, 211–218 (2008). doi: 10.1007/s10664-008-9060-1

    Google Scholar 

  156. Sieber, J.E.: Protecting research subjects, employees and researchers: implications for software engineering. Empir. Softw. Eng. 6(4), 329–341 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  157. Siegel, S., Castellan, J.: Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill International Editions, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  158. Singer, J., Vinson, N.G.: Why and how research ethics matters to you. Yes, you! Empir. Softw. Eng. 6, 287–290 (2001). doi: 10.1023/A:1011998412776

    Google Scholar 

  159. Singer, J., Vinson, N.G.: Ethical issues in empirical studies of software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 28(12), 1171–1180 (2002). doi: 10.1109/TSE.2002.1158289. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=1158289

    Google Scholar 

  160. Simon S.: Fermat’s Last Theorem. Fourth Estate, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  161. Sjøberg, D.I.K., Hannay, J.E., Hansen, O., Kampenes, V.B., Karahasanovic, A., Liborg, N.-K., Rekdal, A.C.: A survey of controlled experiments in software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 31(9), 733–753 (2005). doi: 10.1109/TSE.2005.97. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=1514443

    Google Scholar 

  162. Sjøberg, D.I.K., Dybå, T., Anda, B., Hannay, J.E.: Building theories in software engineering. In: Shull, F., Singer, J., Sjøberg D. (eds.) Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering. Springer, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  163. Sommerville, I.: Software Engineering, 9th edn. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, England/ Reading (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  164. Sørumgård, S.: Verification of process conformance in empirical studies of software development. Ph.D. thesis, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Computer and Information Science, Norway (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  165. Stake, R.E.: The Art of Case Study Research. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  166. Staples, M., Niazi, M.: Experiences using systematic review guidelines. J. Syst. Softw. 80(9), 1425–1437 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2006.09.046

    Google Scholar 

  167. Thelin, T., Runeson, P.: Capture-recapture estimations for perspective-based reading – a simulated experiment. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES), Oulu, pp. 182–200 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  168. Thelin, T., Runeson, P., Wohlin, C.: An experimental comparison of usage-based and checklist-based reading. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 29(8), 687–704 (2003). doi: 10.1109/TSE.2003.1223644

    Google Scholar 

  169. Tichy, W.F.: Should computer scientists experiment more? IEEE Comput. 31(5), 32–39 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  170. Tichy, W.F., Lukowicz, P., Prechelt, L., Heinz, E.A.: Experimental evaluation in computer science: a quantitative study. J. Syst. Softw. 28(1), 9–18 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  171. Trochim, W.M.K.: The Research Methods Knowledge Base, 2nd edn. Cornell Custom Publishing, Cornell University, Ithaca (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  172. van Solingen, R., Berghout, E.: The Goal/Question/Metric Method: A Practical Guide for Quality Improvement and Software Development. McGraw-Hill International, London/Chicago (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  173. Verner, J.M., Sampson, J., Tosic, V., Abu Bakar, N.A., Kitchenham, B.A.: Guidelines for industrially-based multiple case studies in software engineering. In: Third International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, Fez, pp. 313–324 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  174. Vinson, N.G., Singer, J.: A practical guide to ethical research involving humans. In: Shull, F., Singer, J., Sjøberg, D. (eds.) Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering. Springer, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  175. Votta, L.G.: Does every inspection need a meeting? In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, ACM Software Engineering Notes, vol. 18, pp. 107–114. ACM Press, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  176. Wallace, C., Cook, C., Summet, J., Burnett, M.: Human centric computing languages and environments. In: Proceedings of Symposia on Human Centric Computing Languages and Environments, Arlington, pp. 63–65 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  177. Wohlin, C., Gustavsson, A., Höst, M., Mattsson, C.: A framework for technology introduction in software organizations. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Software Process Improvement, Brighton, pp. 167–176 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  178. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., Wesslén, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction. Kluwer, Boston (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  179. Wohlin, C., Aurum, A., Angelis, L., Phillips, L., Dittrich, Y., Gorschek, T., Grahn, H., Henningsson, K., Kågström, S., Low, G., Rovegård, P., Tomaszewski, P., van Toorn, C., Winter, J.: Success factors powering industry-academia collaboration in software research. IEEE Softw. (PrePrints) (2011). doi: 10.1109/MS.2011.92

    Google Scholar 

  180. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research Design and Methods, 4th edn. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  181. Zelkowitz, M.V., Wallace, D.R.: Experimental models for validating technology. IEEE Comput. 31(5), 23–31 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  182. Zendler, A.: A preliminary software engineering theory as investigated by published experiments. Empir. Softw. Eng. 6, 161–180 (2001). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1011489321999

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computing Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden

    Claes Wohlin

  2. Department of Computer Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

    Per Runeson, Martin Höst & Björn Regnell

  3. System Verification Sweden AB, Malmö, Sweden

    Magnus C. Ohlsson

  4. ST-Ericsson AB, Lund, Sweden

    Anders Wesslén

Authors
  1. Claes Wohlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Per Runeson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martin Höst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Magnus C. Ohlsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Björn Regnell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Anders Wesslén
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., Wesslén, A. (2012). Planning. In: Experimentation in Software Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29044-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29044-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29043-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29044-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation