Abstract
Society is a collaborative effort: it works to the extent that we can get along with our neighbours, agree on common goals, and accept shared responsibilities. Even opponents of state taxation generally recognize that there are benefits to the collective financing of public services – we don’t want to build and maintain our own roads or hospitals. And because the growth of an economically disadvantaged ‘underclass’ can threaten the stability of society, a degree of redistribution of wealth benefits everyone. So while some of the most fundamental political divisions hinge on the question of where to draw the balance between collective responsibilities and individual liberties, all democratic societies acknowledge that their citizens have to some extent to find ways of cooperating with one another. In particular, liberal philosophers since the seventeenth century have concurred that civil peace and order come at the expense of individual restraint, including at the very least the renunciation of attempts to harm others.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Further Reading
R. Axelrod, The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York, 1984.
M. A. Nowak & R. Highfield, SuperCooperators: Why We Need Each Other to Succeed. Simon & Schuster, New York, 2011.
M. Milinski, D. Semmann & H.-J. Krambeck, ‘Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’’, Nature 415, 424–426 (2002).
S. Saavedra, F. Reed-Tsochas & B. Uzzi, ‘A simple model of bipartite cooperation for ecological and organizational networks’, Nature 457, 463–466 (2009).
D. Helbing, A. Szolnoki, M. Perc & G. Szabó, ‘Punish, nut not too hard: how costly punishment spreads in the spatial public goods game’, New J. Phys. 12, 083005 (2010).
D. Helbing, A. Szolnoki, M. Perc & G. Szabó, G., ‘Evolutionary establishment of moral and double moral standards through spatial interactions’, PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, e1000758 (2010).
D. Helbing & A. Johansson, ‘Cooperation, norms, and revolutions: a unified game-theoretical approach’, PLoS ONE 5, e12530 (2010).
D. Helbing & W. Yu, ‘The outbreak of cooperation among successdriven individuals under noisy conditions’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 3680–3685 (2009).
E. Fehr & S. Gächter, ‘Altruistic punishment in humans’, Nature 415, 137–140 (2002).
A. Dreber, D. G. Rand, D. Fudenberg & M. A. Nowak, ‘Winners don’t punish’, Nature 452, 348–351 (2008).
S. Bowles & H. Gintis, ‘Cooperation’, in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, eds L. Blume & S. Durlauf. Macmillan, London, 2008.
J.-K. Choi & S. Bowles, ‘The coevolution of altruism and war’, Science 318, 636–640 (2007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ball, P. (2012). Love Thy Neighbour: How to Foster Cooperation. In: Why Society is a Complex Matter. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29000-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29000-8_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28999-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29000-8
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)