Advertisement

Few-Cycle, Phase-Locked, Octave IR OPA Using BIBO and 800-nm Pump

  • N. IshiiEmail author
  • K. Kitano
  • T. Kanai
  • S. Watanabe
  • J. Itatani
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics book series (SPPHY, volume 125)

Abstract

Few-cycle, high-energy, infrared (IR) lasers have been recognized as promising drivers to generate coherent radiation and attosecond pulses beyond the softX-ray, reaching the water window. Based on a high harmonic generation (HHG) process driven by IR pulses, preliminary researches have demonstrated the drastic extension of a cutoff energy to a soft X-ray regime compared to Ti:sapphire-based lasers at 800 nm [1–3]. Although few IR drivers aiming at soft X-ray attosecond pulse generation have been constructed [4–7], these prototypes still require further improvement for potential applications in strong field physics and ultrafast spectroscopy.

Keywords

High Harmonic Generation Difference Frequency Generation Attosecond Pulse Seed Pulse Optical Parametric Amplification 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by the Photon Frontier Network Program of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Gordon, F.X. Kärtner, Opt. Express 13, 2941–2947 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. Shan, Z. Chang, Phys. Rev. A 65, 011804(R) (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E.J. Takahashi, T. Kanai, K.L. Ishikawa, Y. Nabekawa, K. Midorikawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 253901 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Fuji, N. Ishii, C.Y. Teisset, X. Gu, Th. Metzger, A. Baltuška, N. Forget, D. Kaplan, A. Galvanauskas, F. Krausz, Opt. Lett. 31, 1103–1105 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Brida, G. Cirmi, C. Manzoni, S. Bonora, P. Villoresi, S. De Silvestri, G. Cerullo, Sub-two-cycle light pulses at 1.6 μm from an optical parametric amplifier. Opt. Lett. 33, 741–743 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    O.D. Mücke, S. Ališauskas, A.J. Verhoef, A. Pugžlys, A. Baltuška, V. Smilgevičius, J. Pocius, L. Giniūnas, R. Danielius, N. Forget, Opt. Lett. 34, 2498–2500 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B.E. Schmidt, P.Béjot, M. Giguère, A.D. Shiner, C. Trallero-Herrero, É. Bisson, J. Kasparian, J.P. Wolf, D.M. Villeneuve, J.C. Kieffer, P.B. Corkum, F. Légaré, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 121109 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. Ishii, K. Kitano, T. Kanai, S. Watanabe, J. Itatani, Appl. Phys. Exp. 4, 022701 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Gaydardzhiev, I. Nikolov, I. Buchvarov, V. Petrov, F. Noack, Opt. Express 16, 2363–2373 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Fuji, A. Apolonski, F. Krausz, Opt. Lett. 29, 632–634 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Zimmermann, Ch. Gohle, R. Holzwarth, Th. Udem, T.W. Hänsch, Opt. Lett. 29, 310–312 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. Manzoni, G. Cerullo, S. De Silvestri, Opt. Lett. 29, 2668–2670 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Ishii
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • K. Kitano
    • 1
    • 2
  • T. Kanai
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Watanabe
    • 2
    • 3
  • J. Itatani
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute for Solid State PhysicsUniversity of TokyoKashiwaJapan
  2. 2.CREST, Japan Science and Technology AgencyTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Tokyo University of ScienceNodaJapan
  4. 4.PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology AgencyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations