Skip to main content

KETO: A Knowledge Editing Tool for Encoding Condition – Action Guidelines into Clinical DSSs

  • Conference paper
Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems (HAIS 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7208))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines are expected to promote more consistent, effective, and efficient medical practices, especially if implemented in clinical Decision Support Systems (DSSs). One prerequisite for the broad acceptance of clinical DSSs and their efficient application to medical settings is the guarantee of a high level of upgradability and maintainability. In this respect, this paper proposes KETO (Knowledge Editing TOol), a user-friendly tool to guide and assist the editing and formalization of condition-action clinical recommendations into a hybrid Knowledge Base (KB), made of if-then rules built on the top of ontological vocabularies, to be then used in a clinical DSS. The tool aims at: i) synergistically combining multiple knowledge representation techniques for building efficient DSSs able to deal with different clinical problems; ii) reducing the complexity of the formalization process, by enabling the creation and automatic encoding into machine executable languages of hybrid KBs that could be functional in the context of clinical DSSs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Woolf, S.: Practice guidelines, a new reality in medicine: II. methods of developing guidelines. Archives of Internal Medicine 152(5), 946–952 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Scott, I.: What are the most effective strategies for improving quality and safety of health care? Internal Medicine Journal 39(6), 389–400 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shortliffe, E., Cimino, J.: Biomedical informatics: computer applications in health care and biomedicine. Springer, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Linder, J.A., Ma, J., Bates, D.W., Middleton, B., Stafford, R.S.: Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. Archives of I. M, pp. 1400–1405 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Himmelstein, D.U., Wright, A., Woolhandler, S.: Hospital computing and the costs and quality of care: a national study. American Journal of Medicine 123(1), 40–46 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Niemi, K., Geary, S., Quinn, B., Larrabee, M., Brown, K.: Implementation and evaluation of electronic clinical decision support for compliance with pneumonia and heart failure quality indicators. American J. of Health-System Pharmacy 66(4), 389–397 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brokel, J., Shaw, M., Nicholson, C.: Expert clinical rules automate steps in delivering evidence-based care in the electronic health record. C. Inf. Nursing 24(4), 196–205 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shiffman, R.: Representation of clinical practice guidelines in conventional and augmented decision tables. J. of the American Medical Informatics Association 4(5), 382–393 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Peleg, M., Tu, S., Bury, J., et al.: Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach. J. of the American Medical Informatics Assoc. 10(1), 52–68 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Colantonio, S., De Pietro, G., Esposito, M., Machì, A., Martinelli, M., Salvetti, O.: Decision Support for the Remote Management of Chronic Patients. In: Proc. of the 2nd Internat. ICST Conference on Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare, Kos Island, Greece (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Colantonio, S., De Pietro, G., Esposito, M., Machì, A., Martinelli, M., Salvetti, O.: Knowledge Based Decision Support For The Management Of Chronic Patients. In: Proc. of the Int. Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Paris, France (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Minutolo, A., Esposito, M., De Pietro, G.: A Mobile Reasoning System for Supporting the Monitoring of Chronic Diseases. In: Proc. of the 2nd International ICST Conference on Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare, Kos Island, Greece (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shahar, Y., Young, O., Shalom, E., Galperin, M., Mayaffit, A., Moskovitch, R., Hessing, A.: A framework for a distributed, hybrid, multiple-ontology clinical-guideline library, and automated guideline-support tools. J. of Biomedical Informatics 37(5), 325–344 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Duftschmid, G., Miksch, S.: Knowledge-based verification of clinical guidelines by detection of anomalies. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 22(1), 23–41 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cooke, N.J.: Varieties of knowledge elicitation techniques. I. J. of HC Studies 41, 801–849

    Google Scholar 

  16. Escórcio, L., Cardoso, J.: Editing Tools for Ontology Construction. Semantic Web Services: Theory, Tools and Applications. Idea Group

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gómez-Pérez, A., Ortiz-Rodriguez, F., Villazón-Terrazas, B.: Ontological Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Garcia-Barriocanal, E., Sicilia, M.A., Sanchez-Alonso, S.: Usability evaluation of ontology editors. Knowledge Organization 32(1), 1–9 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Corchado, E., Graña, M., Wozniak, M.: New trends and applications on hybrid artificial intelligence systems. Neurocomputing 75(1), 61–63 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Corchado, E., Abraham, A., Carvalho, A.: Hybrid intelligent algorithms and applications. Information Sciences 180(14), 2633–2634 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Straszecka, E.: Medical Knowledge Representation in Terms of IF-THEN Rules and the Dempster-Shafer Theory. Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing, 1056–1061 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. OWL2 (Web Ontology Language), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/

  23. Carroll, J.J., Dickinson, I., Dollin, C., Reynolds, D., Seaborne, A., Wilkinson, K.: Jena: implementing the semantic web recommendations. In: Proc. of the 13th Internat. World Wide Web Conference on Alternate Track Papers & Posters, New York, USA, pp. 74–83 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. MacKay, D.: Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Minutolo, A., Sannino, G., Esposito, M., De Pietro, G.: A rule-based mHealth system for cardiac monitoring. Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES), 144–149 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Minutolo, A., Esposito, M., De Pietro, G. (2012). KETO: A Knowledge Editing Tool for Encoding Condition – Action Guidelines into Clinical DSSs. In: Corchado, E., Snášel, V., Abraham, A., Woźniak, M., Graña, M., Cho, SB. (eds) Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems. HAIS 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7208. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28942-2_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28942-2_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28941-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28942-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics