Skip to main content

Social Networks and Media Brands: Exploring the Effect of Media Brands’ Perceived Social Network Usage on Audience Relationship

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Social Media Management

Part of the book series: Media Business and Innovation ((MEDIA))

Abstract

The proliferation of social media such as Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube has brought dramatic changes in consumer’s media consumption behavior. With more and more consumers participating in some forms of social media, these platforms have become important means of consumer engagement. From a branding perspective, such a two-way communication mechanism creates viable channels for ongoing dialogues and long-term bonds between companies and customers. Social networks’ branding potential, especially in the context of relationship building, seems to offer traditional media which were handicapped by the one-way communication mechanism an opportunity to connect with audiences more effectively in an increasingly competitive marketplace. This chapter empirically examines the contribution of social networks as a branding tool for media products from the relational perspective. It investigates if the perceived use of social networks by a media brand plays a role in enhancing its brand equity and in consumer’s intention to develop a relationship with the brand. Specifically, the chapter addresses the relationship between consumer’s perceived social network usage by a media brand and the “perceived relationship investment” (PRI) of that brand; association between PRI and consumer-based brand equity (CBBE); the effect of a media brand’s CBBE on an audience’s intention to develop a relationship with that brand; and the relationship between an audience’s PRI of a media brand and his/her intention to build a relationship with that brand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ailawadi, K. L., Lehmann, D. R., & Neslin, A. S. (2003). Revenue premium as an outcome measure of brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 67(October), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P. (1983). Issues in the application of covariance structure analysis: A future comment. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(4), 449–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P. (1995). Reflections on relationship marketing in consumer markets. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 272–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T. L., Simpson, P. M., & Siguaw, J. A. (1999). The impact of suppliers’ perceptions of reseller market orientation on key relationship constructs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 50–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, M. K., Bourdeau, B. L., & Heskel, J. (2005). The importance of brand cues in intangible service industries: An application to investment services. Journal of Services Marketing, 19(6), 401–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, T. A., Frels, J. K., & Mahajan, V. (2003). Consumer switching costs: A typology, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(2), 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cone Business in Social Media Research (September 25, 2008). Cone finds that Americans expect companies to have a presence in social media. Retrieved November 10, 2009 from http://www.coneinc.com/content1182.

  • De Wulf, K., Odekerken-Schroder, G., & Iacobucci, D. (2001). Investments in consumer relationships: A cross-country and cross-industry exploration. Journal of Marketing, 65(4), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutskens, E., Jong, A., Ruyter, K., & Wetzels, M. (2006). Comparing the generalizability of online and mail surveys in cross-national service quality research. Marketing Letters, 17(2), 119–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • eMarketer. (June 24, 2011). Social media marketing brings new revenues, customers. Retrieved July 15, 2011, from http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1008459.

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation model with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anerson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvard Business Review Analytics Service Report. (2010). The new conversation: Taking social media from talk to action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. The Journal of Marketing, 57, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L. (2002). Branding and brand equity. In B. Weitz & R. Wensley (Eds.), Handbook of marketing (pp. 151–178). London, UK: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L. (2003). Measuring, and managing brand equity (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L., & Lehmann, D. R. (2006). Brands and branding: Research findings and future priorities. Marketing Science, 25(6), 740–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Bohling, T. R., & Ladda, R. N. (2003). Antecedents and consequences of relationship intention: Implications for transaction and relationship marketing. Industrial Marketing Management, 32, 667–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, D. R., Netemeyer, R. G., & Burton, S. (1990). Distinguishing coupon proneness from value consciousness: An acquisition-transaction utility theory perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment–trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, K. B., & Schlacter, J. L. (1990). The impact of services versus goods on consumer’s assessment of perceived risk and variability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18(1), 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinstein, D. A., & Snyder, C. M. (2005). The influence of expert reviews on consumer demand for experience goods: A case study of movie critics. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 53(1), 27–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. B., & Barclay, D. W. (1997). The effects of organizational differences and trust on the effectiveness of selling partner relationships. Journal of Marketing, 6(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, J. (2009). Marketing and social media: Everyone’s social (Already). CRM Magazine, 13(6), 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsotsis, A. (December 29, 2010). Hitwise: Facebook overtakes google to become most visited website in 2010. Techcrunch. Retrieved July 15, 2011, from http://techcrunch.com/2010/12/29/hitwise-facebook-overtakes-google-to-become-most-visited-website-in-2010/.

  • Turley, L. M., & Moore, P. A. (1995). Brand name strategies in the service sector. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 12(4), 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virtrue (2009). The virtue 100: Top social brands of 2009. Retrieved January 10, 2010, from http://vitrue.com/blog/2010/01/04/the-vitrue-100-top-social-brands-of-2009/.

  • Wang, C.-H., Hsu, L.-C., & Fang, S.-R. (2009). Constructing a relationship-based brand equity model. Service Business, 3(3), 275–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, D. A. (November, 2009). PGs and social media: Much more than advertising. eMarketer. Retrieved January 6, 2010, from http://www.emarketer.com/Reports/All/Emarketer_2000620.aspx.

  • Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2006). Mass media research: An introduction (38th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Business Research, 52(April), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, D., Choi, S. M., & Sohn, D. (2008). Building customer relationships in an electronic age: The role of interactivity of e-commerce web sites. Psychology and Marketing, 25(7), 602–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvia Chan-Olmsted .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chan-Olmsted, S., Cho, M., Yim, M.YC. (2013). Social Networks and Media Brands: Exploring the Effect of Media Brands’ Perceived Social Network Usage on Audience Relationship. In: Friedrichsen, M., Mühl-Benninghaus, W. (eds) Handbook of Social Media Management. Media Business and Innovation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28897-5_43

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics