Skip to main content

A Model-Based Approach for Qualitative Assessment in Opinion Mining

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Classification and Data Mining

Abstract

Data mining is an increasing area of interest where the collection of large amount of data is characterized by heterogeneous information with respect to origin and content; thus, a high degree of specialization is required for a correct analysis. In this paper, we limit ourselves to consider opinions that are expressed as ordered preferences and may be delivered as rating or ranking evaluations. Such situations are different and deserve careful considerations. In both cases, we discuss the framework of CUB models introduced to analyse the ordinal responses by which people express their opinions. Specifically, the approach may be inserted as a useful routine in data mining area for improving the study of essential features supported by empirical evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Such optimizations have been pursued by the application module CML of GAUSS language (Aptech, 2002), aimed at constrained maximum likelihood estimation.

References

  • Aptech Systems, Inc. (2002). Constrained maximum likelihood estimation for GAUSS, version 2.0.3. Mapley Valley, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z. (2001). Data mining and uncertain reasoning: An integrated approach. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corduas, M., Iannario, M., & Piccolo, D. (2010). A class of statistical models for evaluating services and performances. In M. Bini, et al. (Eds.), Statistical methods for the evaluation of educational services and quality of products (Contribution to Statistics, pp. 99–117). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Elia, A., & Piccolo, D. (2005). A mixture model for preference data analysis. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 49, 917–934.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fayyad, U., Piatelsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P., & Uthurusamy, R. (1996). Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining. Cambridge: AAAI/MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frawley, W., Piatelsky-Shapiro, G., & Matheus, C. (1991). Knowledge discovery in databases: An overview. In G. Piatetsky-Shapiro & W. Frawley (Eds.), Knowledge discovery in databases (pp. 1–30). Menlo Park: AAAI/MIT. Reprinted also in: AI Magazin, Fall (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannario, M. (2008). A class of models for ordinal variables with covariates effects. Quaderni di Statistica, 10, 53–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannario, M. (2010). On the identifiability of a mixture model for ordinal data. Metron, LXVIII, 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannario, M. (2012). Preliminary estimators for a mixture model of ordinal data, Advances in Data Analysis and Applications, 6, DOI 10.1007/s11634-012-0111-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannario, M., & Piccolo, D. (2009). A program in R for CUB models inference, Version 2.0, Available at http://www.dipstat.unina.it/CUBmodels1/.

  • Iannario, M., & Piccolo, D. (2010). Statistical modelling of subjective survival probabilities. GENUS, LXVI, 17–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannario, M., & Piccolo, D. (2012). CUB models: Statistical methods and empirical evidence. In R. Kenett & S. Salini (Eds.), Modern analysis of customer satisfaction surveys: with applications using R (pp. 231–258) Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. (2010). Sentiment analysis and subjectivity. In N. Indurkhya & F. J. Damerau (Eds.), Handbook of natural language processing (pp. 627–666). London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marden, J. I. (1995). Analyzing and modeling rank data. London: Chapman and Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized linear models (2nd ed.). London: Chapman and Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, R., Elder, J., & Miner, G. (2009). Handbook of statistical analysis and data mining applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Academic.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Piccolo, D. (2003). On the moments of a mixture of uniform and shifted binomial random variables. Quaderni di Statistica, 5, 85–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccolo, D. (2006). Observed information matrix for MUB models. Quaderni di Statistica, 8, 33–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccolo, D., & D’Elia, A. (2008). A new approach for modelling consumers’ preferences. Food Quality and Preference, 19, 247–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plackett, R. L. (1975). The analysis of permutations. Applied Statistics, 24, 193–202.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L. (2000). A multistage ranking model. Psychometrika, 65, 217–231.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The paper has been partly supported by a MIUR grant (code 2008WKHJPK-PRIN2008) for the project: “Modelli per variabili latenti basati su dati ordinali: metodi statistici ed evidenze empiriche” within the Research Unit of University of Naples Federico II (PUC number E61J10000020001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Iannario .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Iannario, M., Piccolo, D. (2013). A Model-Based Approach for Qualitative Assessment in Opinion Mining. In: Giusti, A., Ritter, G., Vichi, M. (eds) Classification and Data Mining. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28894-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics