Advertisement

Integrating Remote Laboratories in Post-secondary Science Education

  • Dietmar Karl Kennepohl
  • Jit Baran
  • Ron Currie
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 282)

Abstract

The ability to provide the post-secondary student an excellent laboratory experience is crucial in many disciplines within the sciences and engineering. Remote access to teaching experiments offers educators another tool to incorporate a strong laboratory component with the added advantage of functionality and flexibility. This paper presents a comparative perspective to remote logistics laboratories by exploring remote environments for learning and research in the sciences. It is vital that the learning design of online teaching laboratories address the reinforcement of course principles and theory, as well as provide adequate student orientation to allow successful operation within a remote setting. The issues and considerations around integrating a remote experiment and creating a supportive student-centred learning environment are presented using our own experience with modern chemical analytical instruments as a concrete example. A brief analysis of this developing model is provided, as well as student and instructor feedback summarized as lessons learned.

Keywords

Distance Learning Analytical Chemistry Instrumental Methods Remote Instrumentation Student-Centred Learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cox, M.J., Baruch, J.E.F.: Robotic Telescopes: An Interactive Exhibit on the World Wide Web. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of the World Wide Web, Chicago (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Penfield Jr., P., Larson, R.C.: Education via Advanced Technologies. IEEE Trans. Educ. 39, 436–443 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kennepohl, D.: Remote Control Teaching Laboratories and Practicals. In: Kennepohl, D., Shaw, L. (eds.) Accessible Elements: Teaching Science Online and at a Distance, pp. 167–187. AU Press, Canada (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bailey, P.D., Garratt, J.: Chemical Education: Theory and Practice. Univ. Chem. Educ. 6, 39–57 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ogot, M., Elliot, G., Glumac, N.: An Assessment of In-person and Remotely Operated Laboratories. J. Eng. Educ. 92, 57–64 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Doulgeri, Z., Matiakis, T.: A Web Telerobotic System to Teach Industrial Robot Path Planning and Control. IEEE Trans. Educ. 49, 263–270 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fiore, L., Ratti, G.: Remote Laboratory and Animal Behaviour: An Interactive Open Field System. Comp. & Educ. 49, 1299–1307 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cortera, J.E., Escheb, S.K., Mac, J., Nickerson, J.V.: Process and Learning Outcomes from Remotely-operated, Simulated, and Hands-on Student Laboratories. Comp. & Educ. 57(3), 2054–2067 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lindsay, E.D., Good, C.: Effects of Laboratory Access Modes Upon Learning Outcomes. IEEE Trans. Educ. 48, 619–631 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cagiltay, N.E., Aydin, E., Aydin, C.C., Kara, A., Alexandru, M.: Seven Principles of Instructional Content Design for a Remote Laboratory: A Case Study on ERRL. IEEE Trans. Educ. 54(2), 320–327 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kennepohl, D., Baran, J., Connors, M., Quigley, K., Currie, R.: Remote Access to Instrumental Analysis for Distance Education in Science. IRRODL 6(3) (2005), http://www.irrodl.org/content/v6.3/kennepohl.html
  12. 12.
    Abdulwahed, M.: Towards Enhancing Laboratory Education by the Development and Evaluation of the Trilab: A Triple Access Mode (Virtual, Hands-on and Remote) Laboratory. Doctoral thesis Loughborough University, England (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Orduña, P., García-Zubia, J., Irurzun, J., López-de-Ipiña, D., Rodriguez-Gil, L.: Enabling Mobile Access to Remote Laboratories. In: 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) – Learning Environments and Ecosystems in Engineering Education, Amman, Jordan (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dziabenko, O., García-Zubia, J.: Remote Experiments and Online Games: How to Merge Them? In: 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) – Learning Environments and Ecosystems in Engineering Education, Amman, Jordan (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Connors, M.: A Decade of Success in Physics Distance Education at Athabasca University. Phys. Can. 60, 49–54 (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Archer, W., Garrison, R.: Assessing Teaching Presence in Computer Conferencing Transcripts. J. Asynch. Learn. Net. 5(2) (2001), http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/jaln-vol5issue2v2.htm

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dietmar Karl Kennepohl
    • 1
  • Jit Baran
    • 2
  • Ron Currie
    • 2
  1. 1.Athabasca UniversityAthabascaCanada
  2. 2.Northern Alberta Institute of TechnologyEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations