Advertisement

Towards a New Dimension for User Modeling: The Use of Sensory Vocabulary

  • Gudrun Kellner
  • Bettina Berendt
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7138)

Abstract

One aspect of user preference, which is of high interest especially for the field of e-learning, concerns the mode of presenting information: What sensory system(s) should be addressed to make information interesting and easy to understand for the user? The answer might be found when looking at the user’s perceptual preferences. To test the user would be the most direct way – and the most annoying for the user. In our research, we investigate the use of sensory vocabulary in forum texts as a source of implicit information on the user. Therefore, a corpus with more than 1,000,000 forum posts was analyzed for the occurrence of expressions that are directly linked to a sensory system. We found that users differ significantly in their use of sensory expressions and that most users have preferred patterns for the use of sensory expressions.

Keywords

User Modeling Perception Language use 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Andreevskaia, A., Bergler, S., Urseanu, M.: All Blogs Are Not Made Equal: Exploring Genre Differences in Sentiment Tagging of Blogs. In: Proceedings of the Int. Conf. on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2007), Boulder, Colorado, pp. 195–198 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baeza-Yates, R., Ribeiro-Neto, B.: Modern Information Retrieval. Addison-Wesley, Harlow (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balog, K., de Rijke, M.: How to Overcome Tiredness: Estimating Topic-Mood Associations. In: Proceedings of the Int. Conf. on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2007), pp. 199–202 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., Ecclestone, K.: Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning. A Systematic and Critical Review (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dunn, R.: Commentary: Teaching Students Through Their Perceptual Strengths or Preferences. Journal of Reading 31(4), 304–309 (1988)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Felder, R., Silverman, L.: Learning and Teaching Styles In Engineering Education. Engr. Education 78(7), 674–681 (1988)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Godbole, N., Srinivasaiah, M., Skiena, S.: Large-Scale Sentiment Analysis for News and Blogs. In: Proceedings of the ICWSM 2007, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 219–222 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heinath, M., Dzaack, J., Wiesner, A., Urbas, L.: Applications for Cognitive User Modeling. In: Conati, C., McCoy, K., Paliouras, G. (eds.) UM 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4511, pp. 127–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kellner, G.: Wege der Kommunikationsoptimierung. Anwendung von NLP im Bereich der Künstlichen Intelligenz. VDM, Saarbrücken (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kellner, G., Berendt, B.: Extracting Knowledge about Cognitive Style. The Use of Sensory Vocabulary in Forums: A Text Mining Approach. In: Proceedings of the NLPKE 2011. IEEE press (2011) (in Press)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mei, Q., Ling, X., Wondra, M., Su, H., Zhai, C.X.: Topic sentiment mixture: modeling facets and opinions in weblogs. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 171–180 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nowson, S.: The Language of Weblogs: A study of genre and individual differences. Doctoral Thesis. University of Edinburgh (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Richling, J.: Die Sprache in Foren und Newsgroups. VDM, Saarbrücken (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sadler-Smith, E., Riding, R.: Cognitive style and instructional preferences. Instructional Science 27, 355–371 (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Strappavara, C., Valitutti, A., Stock, O.: The AffectiveWeight of Lexicon. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Genoa, pp. 423–426 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Valitutti, A., Strappavara, C., Stock, O.: Developing Affective Lexical Resources. Psychology 2(1), 61–83 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gudrun Kellner
    • 1
  • Bettina Berendt
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Software Technology and Interactive SystemsVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceK.U. LeuvenLeuven-HeverleeBelgium

Personalised recommendations