Advertisement

Motivating People in Smart Environments

  • Berardina De Carolis
  • Irene Mazzotta
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7138)

Abstract

In this paper we discuss the possibility to extend PORTIA, a persuasion system currently applied in human-agent dialogs, to support ambient persuasion. We have identified a fitness center as an appropriate smart environment in which ambient persuasion strategies can be applied. According to the Ubiquitous Computing vision, in the fitness center the user is surrounded by several connected devices that cooperate in the persuasion process, each of them with the most appropriate strategy, mode of persuasion, style of communication according to the context. To this aim we propose a multi-agent system able to support this distributed and intelligent approach to persuasion that allows to follow the user during the gradual change from the initial attitude to sustain of long term behaviours.

Keywords

Persuasion Systems Ambient Intelligence Multi-Agent systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aarts, E., Markopoulos, P., de Ruyter, B.: The persuasiveness of ambient intelligence. In: Petkovic, M., Jonker, W. (eds.) Security, Privacy, and Trust in Modern Data Management, pp. 367–381. Springer, Berlin (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bickmore, T.: Relational Agents: Effecting Change through Human-Computer Relationships. PhD Thesis, Media Arts & Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R., Lorini, E.: A non-reductionist Approach to Trust. In: Goldbeck, J. (ed.) Computing with Social Trust, pp. 45–72. Springer, Berlin (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cozzolongo, G., De Carolis, B., Pizzutilo, S.: A Personal Agent Supporting Ubiquitous Interaction. In: WOA 2004, Torino, Italia, pp. 55–61 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    de Rosis, F., Novielli, N., Carofiglio, V., Cavalluzzi, A., De Carolis, B.: User Modeling And Adaptation In Health Promotion Dialogs With An Animated Character. International Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 514–531 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dey, A.K., Abowd, G.D.: Towards a Better Understanding of Context and Context-Awareness. In: Workshop on ‘The What, Who, Where, When, and How of Context-Awareness’, as Part of CHI 2000, The Hague, The Netherlands (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Festinger, L.: A theory of social comparison processes. Hum. Relat. 7, 117–140 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What we Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guerini, M., Stock, O., Zancanaro, M., O’Keefe, D.J., Mazzotta, I., de Rosis, F., Poggi, I., Lim, M.Y., Aylett, R.: Approaches to Verbal Persuasion in Intelligent User Interfaces. In: Petta, P., Cowie, R., Pelachaud, C. (eds.) The HUMAINE Handbook on Emotion-Oriented Systems Technologies. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaptein, M., Markopoulos, P., de Ruyter, B., Aarts, E.: Persuasion in Ambient Intelligence. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mann, W.C., Matthiesen, C.M., Thompson, S.A.: Rhetorical structure theory and text analysis. Information Sciences Institute Research Report ISI/RR-89-242, 89–242 (1989)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marsella, S.C., Johnson, W.L., LaBore, C.M.: Interactive pedagogical drama for health interventions (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mazzotta, I., de Rosis, F.: Artifices for persuading to improve eating habits. AAAI Spring Symposium on "Argumentation for consumers of health care", Stanford, USA. Technical Report SS-06-01, 76–85 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mazzotta, I., de Rosis, F., Carofiglio, V.: PORTIA: a user-adapted persuasion system in the healthy eating domain. IEEE Intelligent Systems 22(6), 42–51 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mazzotta, I., Silvestri, V., de Rosis, F.: Emotional And Non Emotional Persuasion Strength. In: Proceedings of AISB 2008, Symposium on ‘Persuasive Technology’, pp. 14–21 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miceli, M., de Rosis, F., Poggi, I.: Emotional and non-emotional persuasion. Applied Artificial Intelligence: an International Journal 20(10), 849–880 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems: Networks of Plausible Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1988)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In: Berkowitz, L. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 19, pp. 123–205. Academic Press, New York (1986)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pinel, E.C., Long, A.E., Landau, M.J., Alexander, K., Pyszczynski, T.: Seeing I to I: a pathway to interpersonal connectedness. J. Pers. Social Psychol. 90, 243–257 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stock, O., Guerini, M., Zancanaro, M.: The foundations of interaction design. In: Interface Design and Persuasive Intelligent User Interfaces. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Walton, D.N.: Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, N.J., Erlbaum (1996)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Walton, D.N.: The place of emotion in argument. The Pennsylvania State University Press (1992)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Walton, D.: What is reasoning? What is an argument? Journal of Philosophy 87, 399–419 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weiser, M.: Some computer science issues in ubiquitous computing. Commun. ACM 36(7), 75–84 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Berardina De Carolis
    • 1
  • Irene Mazzotta
    • 1
  1. 1.Intelligent Interfaces Research Group, Dipartimento di InformaticaUniversity of BariBariItaly

Personalised recommendations