Abstract
Considering the vast differences between the states studied in this volume the question arises whether there is any common ground for the meaning of judicial independence which warrants transnational conclusions. There are voices in academic literature contesting the notion of judicial independence as a legally binding principle, on both the national and international levels, and qualifying it as mere rhetoric with varying meanings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Seibert-Fohr, A. (2012). Judicial Independence – The Normativity of an Evolving Transnational Principle. In: Seibert-Fohr, A. (eds) Judicial Independence in Transition. Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht, vol 233. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28299-7_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28299-7_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28298-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28299-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)