Using Self Organizing Maps to Find Good Comparison Universities
Colleges and universities do not operate in a vacuum and they do not have a lock on “best practices”. As a result it is important to have other schools to use for “benchmark” comparisons. At the same time schools and their students change. What might have been good “benchmarks” in the past might not be appropriate in the future. This research demonstrates the viability of Self Organizing Maps (SOMs) as a means to find comparable institutions across many variables. An example of the approach shows which schools in the Council of Public Liberal Arts Colleges might be the best “benchmarks” for Fort Lewis College.
KeywordsKohonen self organizing maps neural networks benchmarking higher education
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.COPLAC, Data Profile (2009), http://www.coplac.org/resources.html (retrieved January 5, 2011)
- 2.Benchmarking in Higher Education: Adapting Best Practices To Improve Quality. Eric Clearinghouse, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 4.Venna, J., Kaski, S.: Comparison of Visualization Methods for an Atlas of Gene Expression Data Sets. Information Visualization 6(2) (2007)Google Scholar
- 5.Kaski, S., Nikkilä, J., Oja, M., Venna, J., Törönen, P., Castrén, E.: Trustworthiness and metrics in visualizing similarity of gene expression. BMC Bioinformatics (2003)Google Scholar
- 6.Visa, Eklund, T., Back, B., Vanharanta, H., Ari.: Using the Self-Organizing Map as a Visualization Tool in Financial Benchmarking. Information Visualization 2(3) (2003)Google Scholar
- 7.Mazanec, J.: Positioning Analysis with Self-Organizing Maps – An Exploratory Study on Luxury Hotels. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly 6, 80–96 (1995)Google Scholar
- 8.Castellani, B., Castellani, J., Spray, S.L.: Grounded Neural Networking: Modeling Complex Quantitative Data. Symbolic Interaction 26(4) (2003)Google Scholar
- 10.Saha, A.: Cited in Data Modeling for Metrology and Testing in Measurement science (2002); Pavese, F., Forbes, A.: p. 235 (2009)Google Scholar